Not exact matches
Ornstein
says that «there's this
belief, and it's
wrong, that screening tests can only help, not hurt.»
«And the greater fool has this
belief that's
wrong that they are going to grow [subscribers] forever and one day jack up price and keep the excess price increase,»
said Pachter.
If you are losing money consistently, it's probably safe to
say that you are thinking about the market all
wrong and that you need to totally change your
beliefs about what Forex trading success is all about and how to achieve it.
In reading some of the comments, I would just like to
say that I would rather take a chance of being
wrong in my
belief in God as well as my faith in Jesus Christ as to be one that
says there is no God only to stand before Him in the final judgement to hear the words «depart from me» and be cast into the lake of fire...
If I'm
wrong and there is nothing after death, I tried something.I tried the best I could to become what my
belief said.
It's only in the last century that people have tried to make the Bible fit their
beliefs rather then align their life with what the bible
says, and look at the results, the world is in turmoil and on a downward spiral out of control and this article is a good example of trying to make God's word an excuse to do every
wrong thing there is real good reporting.
@grist how many times has the world pushed their stuff on christians
saying we cant pray in school
saying we cant you persecute us all the time you take GOD's name in vein right in our faces all the time and we come out and stand up for our
beliefs and we are the bad guy i'm sorry sir but you are extrtemly
wrong funny everything us christians do is
wrong telling us what to preach and what not to preach and you
say we are pushing our
beliefs on people
I'm
saying that there is nothing
wrong with the
belief in something rather than nothing.
No matter what you may ask or what you
say that contradicts my
beliefs, you are
wrong, I am the voice of Christ, believe or you are going to be eternally punished, I Topher as the voice of the Lord have spoken.
Kevin your right personal
beliefs and or religion does not belong in law, and I am not
saying that what this atheist organization is doing is
wrong or anything, I think what there doing is a good thing, I just think this particular message could have been done from a different perspective, this message makes them appear like the self righteous ones, and it might give out the
wrong kind of message, instead it should have
said something like you believe in god fine, but don't put it in our laws.
In typical fashion, your should now react the way that the religious have reacted to their
belief being shown
wrong... it is simple... just
say» oh that part isn't meant to be taken literally» and move on...
This is the United States of America, land of the free, last I checked... I don't force my personal
beliefs on anyone else, nor do I expect others to force their personal
beliefs on me... This family is not harming anyone in living their life following THEIR
beliefs... Who gives ANYONE else the right to
say they're
WRONG because they choose to share their lives as they do?
If that was the case, then I'd
say the company was in the
wrong if it was only for his
beliefs.
And as I
said before, if you ignore the
wrongs done in the name of religious
beliefs, you are condoning them.
That
belief was my choice, nobody put a gun to my head and made me pick my faith... And you
said I was
wrong.
Of course you can be proven
wrong... your holy book was written by man, no god involved; thus your
belief is based on the fairy tales told by men who saw a gullible fool a mile away - see, how easy that is??? As for the actual number being only 1.6 billion, sorry the stats
say different and your opinion on who the actual number includes is moot.
You two dipsh!ts might notice that I did not
say that the logic was
wrong, but no, like all other foaming - at - the - mouth fundamental whackholes, you fly off into a rage when anyone does not agree with every single word and comma of your
belief set.
The
belief that there are no gods
says nothing about what is right or
wrong.
I repeat: I hope I am
wrong; but I am, all the same, beginning to wonder if the warm support with which even quite unexpected people in our hierarchy (like Bishop Hollis) greeted the establishment of the Ordinariate this time round (you will remember the hostility with which they squashed a similar but less radical basic idea in the Nineties) was really as wholehearted as it seemed at the time: or were they simply
saying what they knew the Pope wanted them to
say, but without any real
belief in the idea itself?
Thank you for giving me the chance to express out but still I am hurt and a nice word will cool it of and guide me if
wrong and about quitting I would because what I am doing now at CNN is taking almost my whole time since the Quran burnning issue and would out doubt I will go back to it and that's why I mentioned earlier that we back here worry about our daily bread and water for family support but needed from you in the free world to notice us out there and have your
say on behalf of all heavenly
beliefs that what is happening is
wrong, One Nation Calamities to other nations benefit, profit?!
The writer of this article is being critical of those who would
say that President Obama has the
wrong beliefs.
Us athiests and agnostics only spout off because like I
said before the believers are constantly pushing their «
beliefs» on the rest of us and trying to convince us how we're
wrong.
Even my very conservative Roman Catholic brother gave me kudos when I
said that if nothing else, as a Baptist, my two cherished
beliefs were in soul liberty and seperation of church and state... so, if god was there and I was completly
wrong not to believe in him, then at least he knew every step of my journey, and in the end my salvation, or lack of it, was between me and god.
A fundamental Christian can use the same Biblical standards to examine the
belief systems of an individual and
say... there is something
wrong.
If I'm
wrong post a citation from the Westminster or Roman catechism that
says we don't have to give a reason for our
beliefs.
So basically, what your actions
say is that if «my
belief» was that... let's
say, Gay marriage is
wrong. . .
People refusing medical treatment because they think they can pray disease away, The demoralizing way religion makes you feel about yourself (I am a wretch, a sinner, a bad person by nature), the religious wars that have been fought for millenia, the self righteous passing laws based on THEIR
beliefs (change to the pledge of allegience which now excludes anyone who does not believe in a fairy godfather, the change to the national motto that turned it into the lie «in god we trust», the bigotry that «my religion is the right one and you are
wrong so I'll pray for you» kind of crap... don't you realize that it is insulting to me when someone
says they will pray for me... its the same as
saying I'm going to do something for you but there won't be any effect, so it is just a waste of time.
That being
said, I hold that it is morally
wrong to kill someone for their
beliefs, and I furthermore submit that no sane god would demand blood simply because someone does not believe in them.
† The Bible
says eating pork, women being equal, and men having long hair (among many other things) is
wrong, and the Bible is always right (see: Genesis 1:1, Psalms 14:1, Psalms 19:1, Romans 1:19 - 20) † Countries where Christianity is prevalent has the highest Suicide rate & Communist countries = EVERY COUNTRY HAS THESE RELIGIOUS
BELIEFS YOU IDIOT!
I also have my own expectations and
beliefs that rub others the
wrong way but I don't demand or expect others to do as I
say.
What Anvil was trying to
say (And Anvil, correct me if I'm
wrong) religion propagates ignorance by encouraging people to believe in something based on faith alone, to sometimes trump reason with
belief.
An exclusive
belief claim is one that
says what I believe is right and all others are
wrong.
About that dogma you've been reposting, if a
belief of mine would be that humans are poop left behind by the flying spaghetti monster as it was flying through, who are you to
say that such
belief is
wrong, and who are you to stigmatize me for such
belief and for the expression thereof?
This guy even
said he questioned himself in what he «believed» One can not tell anyone that a
belief is right or
wrong.
I'm afraid you are
wrong to
say anyone has erroneous
beliefs.
All to
say, «deconstruction» (willingness to throw out
wrong beliefs or behaviors) should be our constant habit.
Hopefully some day we can learn to just look the other way (You know, turn the other cheek as Christ taught), or learn that
saying other people's
beliefs are stupid (atheist's you don't like it when people tell you you're
wrong, but you feel you can tell others they're
wrong) is detrimental to a civilized society.
I'm not
saying you're
wrong — just trying to sustain conversation (I call it converse action, my idiocy) on how we talk about ultimate matters on the one hand, practical matters on the other hand, rationality and irrationality, logic, analogic and illogic,
belief (bias), faith (by virtue of the absurd).
Seriously, I remember when I was in college, there would be these people, called professors, that would even
say my answer is
wrong and give me points off my test... the nerve of them how dare they not be open to my ideas and
beliefs as to how physics work, or what Poe point was, or what actually happen during Roman occupation....
As these
beliefs are their world - view... it tells them what is right or
wrong for them and in the world, so since we can't really separate the believers from their
beliefs, I am just
saying it behooves us to truly understand what a person's world - view truly is, and take appropriate actions accordingly.
All you are doing is
saying your
beliefs are right and mine are
wrong.
I could be
wrong I do believe in a higher power and in love as the universal language (for lack of a better phrase of words, although it might be more universal today to
say sex is the universal language) and in this post just now realized I have to change my 100 % enabler label to 99 % based on the higher power
belief.
I am definitely open to being
wrong here... and maybe I'm missing something, but... I don't think the Consti tution
says anything about people can't vote their (religious)
beliefs.
I could care less what religion he is, it's not going to affect what he does in office - should he win - or what «Christians»
say about Muslims, how they treated Jews and Catholics... it's never ending, as long as you agree with them you are right in their eyes, if you disagree - and that includes different
beliefs - you are
wrong and damned to hell.
«displaying a cross or crucifix is not imposing ones
beliefs on another» It sure is, and by doing it in a school you're telling the kids from families who don't believe that «we're smarter then you, we're trying to educate you, you must be
wrong,» and by putting it in government buildings
says the government supports THAT religion.
It is
wrong for Big Brother govt to
say to all organizations you must provide birth control regardless of your
beliefs because we
said so.
There is nothing in science that
says that your religious
beliefs are
wrong.
You
said, «Why do you deluded masses call atheists «angry»» My guess is that the emotion believers feel when atheists question, or ridicule their silly
beliefs, is very similar to what they feel when someone is angry at them while they think they did nothing
wrong.
Both
say that since you only have theories and
beliefs you are
wrong and niether has proof they are right.
I'm not
saying that religion,
belief in a purpose for our lives as I choose to define it, is inherently
wrong.