«For I will defend this city to save it, for my own sake and for
the sake of my servant David» (v. 34).
34 For I will defend this city to save it, for my own sake and for
the sake of my servant David.»
Not exact matches
* Isaiah 45:4 For Jacob my
servant's
sake, and Israel mine elect, I have even called thee by thy name: * John 13:18 I speak not
of you all: I know whom I have chosen: * Romans 9:13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.
Is it the true and unalterable one which bears his essential characteristics, or the one which he took up for our
sakes when he assumed the form
of a
servant?»
I personally believe that the helpers (pastors, employees, civil
servants, clients, etc.) usually become the victims, and for a lone victim to stand up to an entire institution for the
sake of his or her own health is often quite costly.
This is Deutero - Isaiah's «suffering
servant of the Lord,» the righteous man who suffers for the
sake of God.
Reproached for altering the figure
of the «holy Yehudi» in For the
Sake of Heaven according to a conscious or unconscious Christian tendency, Buber answers that there is not one single trait
of this figure which is not already to be found in the tradition
of the suffering
servant.
Here Jesus is distinctly seen in terms
of the Suffering
Servant, and the Suffering
Servant, however mysterious a figure he may be, was one whose vicarious sufferings were for the
sake of the healing
of his people.
The familiar phrases «he emptied himself [heauton ekenosen], taking the form
of a
servant,» and «though he was rich, yet for your
sake he became poor» have come to seem commonplace.
Jesus referred him to the classes
of those who customarily didn't want to marry or couldn't marry - monks (for the
sake of the kingdom
of heaven - men damaged by the practice
of making eunuchs for use as governmental
servants (Egypt generally) and the class
of people who «from their mother's womb «are not suited (for women?)
We are
servants and messengers, inadequate vessels
of an amazing grace that has been entrusted to us for the
sake of others.
«Blessed are you when people speak ill
of you and revile you for my
sake...» Well done, good and faithful
servant.
It's quite possible that this film meant to stand for something rebellious as it was written, but as the credits roll, the takeaway seems to be that citizens, and even lower - level civil
servants, should just stay in their lane, do what they're told, let the big boys take care
of everything, and for God's
sake do not ask questions.
Given how much greater a role the arts and humanities play in their own right — the arts for arts»
sake — they certainly don't need to be justified by their utility as
servants of science.