Not exact matches
Ulva has been owned
by the same family for 70 years but
owner Jamie Howard, 60, put the island up for
sale last summer, reportedly
because he can no longer afford to run it.
Im not saying they should hand out a game + controller to early adopters but they should do something (even some credit online would suffice) as the
sales figures (so far) are only respectable
because of their fans and they should really show their appreciation of us wii u
owners for «buying in» so early instead of «screwing us over»
by releasing vastly superior bundles so soon
If the borrower indicates a preference for a short
sale or, more generally, not to retain the property, the servicer may not stop collecting documents and information from the borrower pertaining to available home retention options solely
because the borrower has indicated such a preference, but the servicer may stop collecting such documents and information once the servicer receives information confirming that the borrower has an applicable hardship under requirements established
by the
owner or assignee, such as military Permanent Change of Station orders or employment transfer.
While Fisker originally thought that salmon oil would be embraced
by pet
owners because of the value its omega - 3 fatty acids had in supporting cardiovascular health, he says that skin and coat issues turned out to be a much bigger
sales driver.
The aforementioned 15 U.S.C. § 1129 from the other answer indeed looks somewhat applicable, but I highly doubt that anyone would agree that a random myfirstname individual, one who is not expressly famous or known
by any significant proportion of the population under such name, is somehow intrinsically owned a myfirstname.com domain name, just
because they're the first one to file a lawsuit against the present
owner that's offering it on
sale.
But when one discovers that home
owners who sell through real estate most often net more after the closing
because agent - assisted -
sales generate higher offers, then selling
by -
owner does not make sense.
Why should for
sale by owners who want to keep the commission portion without having to pay tax on the money, without having to really even know business law, be able to access a businesses» information just
because they want it?
Buyers buying for
sale by owner should also perhaps have to take a course
because, for instance, lawyers don't cover them after a contract is written and conditions weren't properly added.
The thinking is that there isn't a lot of business for new agents,
because established agents tend to get most of it, but I noticed there were quite a lot of for
sale by owner (FSBO) signs around.
I wanted to interview Greg
because he's got a great website for California home sellers who are selling their homes directly as «for
sale by owner,» NorCal FSBO.
DIY people are unusually successful at selling their homes for -
sale -
by -
owner because they're used to taking on big projects they've never done before.
First off, most buyers» agents don't like showing for -
sale -
by -
owner (FSBO) homes
because of the inevitable hassles.
Nowak said Zillow has information on many listings — like for -
sale -
by -
owner, pre-market and new construction homes — that aren't in MLSs
because they aren't represented
by real estate brokers.
Because of Dave's previous industry experience they made the decision to purchase the «for
sale by owner» program from Comfree.
Sometimes sellers are reluctant to enlist an agent
because they are not confident that the agent will generate enough of a price premium over a for -
sale -
by -
owner transaction to offset the agent's commission.
This 4 % of homes that sold weren't traditional For -
Sale - By - Owner home sales because these homes were NOT actively marketed — no for - sale signs in their yards, no traditional marketing at
Sale -
By -
Owner home
sales because these homes were NOT actively marketed — no for -
sale signs in their yards, no traditional marketing at
sale signs in their yards, no traditional marketing at all.
He does nt need a collateral agreement or similar
because he says he does not represent clients who want to buy from private
sales (not that he signs them up and then won't show the FSBOs) «I don't represent any clients that want to deal with an
owner trying to sell
by themselves».
If, the Competition Bureau doesn't think that Realtors classes are necessary, why can't Realtors disassociate themselves from all the boards and just work as whatever the word would be — Realors - ish
because for
sale by owners are told they can do whatever they want, keep the commission portion (varying but that should be a stated and obvious deemed amount) without paying taxes which they should have to pay taxes on — and also, again, be deemed anticompetitive if they refuse to pay a Realtor a portion of if buyers want to use a Realtor to buy a particular for
sale by owner home.
«And the main reason they said is they're trying to save a few bucks, which is ironic
because the people who want to buy for
sale by owners are usually pretty cheap.»