Sentences with phrase «sale rule in some cases»

But there are ways to circumvent the wash sale rule in some cases.

Not exact matches

In response to a trade case filed by the American jet maker Boeing, the United States Commerce Department ruled that Bombardier's CSeries aircraft, a smaller, regional aircraft that entered service last year, had received subsidies of 219.63 percent of the plane's sales price, and it said it would begin collecting duties equivalent to that amount.

This week, it faces the U.S. Supreme Court in an effort to maintain a 1992 ruling that allows e-commerce companies to avoid collecting local sales taxes in some cases.

Be sure to ask whether your state regulator has received notice of the offering or, in the case of a Rule 504 offering, cleared the offering for sale in your state.

As for the risk part, Silent Stan wants SAFE profit, if he wanted riskier profit then he would spend more on AFC in the gamble that we would gain a larger income... this hasn't been the case since in all the time he has been with us, safe profit has rules and that is the reason for so many # 25mil sales over the years... the CL money.

Companies found guilty of breaching EU rules could be fined up to 10 percent of their global sales, which in Apple's case could reach $ 15.6 billion, based on its 2012 fiscal year.

This perspective was recently given legal validation with the judgment in the case of Re-Digi vs. Capitol Records, where the judge ruled against the idea that digital products qualified for First Sale protection under the law and reinforced the perspective of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that digital products constitute a completely different category of products from hard copy products.

Truth of the matter is, only a fraction of the 300K apps makes up the huge bulk of the sale, you know, the 80/20 rule (in this case, more like 95/5).

This rule does not apply in the case of a tax - exempt bond in order to ensure that the full amount of OID is treated as tax - exempt interest to the holder and that the holder does not have an «artificial» gain on the sale of the bond.

In Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, the case Bozell was writing about back in 2011, the Court ruled 7 - 2 that a California law restricting the sale of violent video games to minors was unconstitutionaIn Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, the case Bozell was writing about back in 2011, the Court ruled 7 - 2 that a California law restricting the sale of violent video games to minors was unconstitutionain 2011, the Court ruled 7 - 2 that a California law restricting the sale of violent video games to minors was unconstitutional.

In a case of first impression, Massachusetts» highest court ruled this week that the firm is entitled to an attorney's lien on patents and patent applications, as well as on the proceeds from the sales of those patents.

In other words, the rules do not apply in a case where the amount being paid for the restrictive covenant is defined, as opposed to being built into the sale pricIn other words, the rules do not apply in a case where the amount being paid for the restrictive covenant is defined, as opposed to being built into the sale pricin a case where the amount being paid for the restrictive covenant is defined, as opposed to being built into the sale price.

Lending Policies, Custom and Practice / Lender Liability Broker Standards of Care and Fiduciary Responsibility Loan Underwriting and Credit Administration Loan Process and Bank Loan Restructure / Workout Process Note Valuations / Collateral Review Litigation and Discovery Consulting Banking Operations / Administration Specialty Niche in SBA Real Estate Lending Construction RE Lending & Administration Expert reports adherent to Federal Rule 26 Loan Syndication / Secondary Market Loan Sales Title Insurance Cases Experienced in trial and deposition testimony

Citing the CJEU's ruling in Ker - Optika, he suggested, «[t] his is the case, for example, with the online sale of goods.

In the case at issue the request for a preliminary ruling was submitted by the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main (Higher Regional Court, Frankfurt am Main) in 2016 in the context of a dispute between Coty Germany GmbH, a supplier of luxury cosmetics established in Germany, and Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, an authorised distributor of those goods, concerning the prohibition, under a selective distribution contract between Coty Germany and its authorised distributors, of the use by the latter, in a discernible manner, of third - party undertakings for internet sales of the contract goodIn the case at issue the request for a preliminary ruling was submitted by the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main (Higher Regional Court, Frankfurt am Main) in 2016 in the context of a dispute between Coty Germany GmbH, a supplier of luxury cosmetics established in Germany, and Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, an authorised distributor of those goods, concerning the prohibition, under a selective distribution contract between Coty Germany and its authorised distributors, of the use by the latter, in a discernible manner, of third - party undertakings for internet sales of the contract goodin 2016 in the context of a dispute between Coty Germany GmbH, a supplier of luxury cosmetics established in Germany, and Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, an authorised distributor of those goods, concerning the prohibition, under a selective distribution contract between Coty Germany and its authorised distributors, of the use by the latter, in a discernible manner, of third - party undertakings for internet sales of the contract goodin the context of a dispute between Coty Germany GmbH, a supplier of luxury cosmetics established in Germany, and Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, an authorised distributor of those goods, concerning the prohibition, under a selective distribution contract between Coty Germany and its authorised distributors, of the use by the latter, in a discernible manner, of third - party undertakings for internet sales of the contract goodin Germany, and Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, an authorised distributor of those goods, concerning the prohibition, under a selective distribution contract between Coty Germany and its authorised distributors, of the use by the latter, in a discernible manner, of third - party undertakings for internet sales of the contract goodin a discernible manner, of third - party undertakings for internet sales of the contract goods.

In its Judgment of 18 October 2012 in case C - 428 / 11 Purely Creative and Others v Office of Fair Trading, the CJEU was confronted with the interpretation of consumer protection rules in the field of aggressive commercial practices in a distant sales scenariIn its Judgment of 18 October 2012 in case C - 428 / 11 Purely Creative and Others v Office of Fair Trading, the CJEU was confronted with the interpretation of consumer protection rules in the field of aggressive commercial practices in a distant sales scenariin case C - 428 / 11 Purely Creative and Others v Office of Fair Trading, the CJEU was confronted with the interpretation of consumer protection rules in the field of aggressive commercial practices in a distant sales scenariin the field of aggressive commercial practices in a distant sales scenariin a distant sales scenario.

In the current case where we are counsel for the Debtor in Possession, the Debtor has developed a platform to resell digital music; however, the Debtor received an adverse ruling from the US District Court in New York holding that the first sale doctrine does not apply to the resale of digital musiIn the current case where we are counsel for the Debtor in Possession, the Debtor has developed a platform to resell digital music; however, the Debtor received an adverse ruling from the US District Court in New York holding that the first sale doctrine does not apply to the resale of digital musiin Possession, the Debtor has developed a platform to resell digital music; however, the Debtor received an adverse ruling from the US District Court in New York holding that the first sale doctrine does not apply to the resale of digital musiin New York holding that the first sale doctrine does not apply to the resale of digital music.

In the case discussed in the article, the District Court Appellate Division had ruled that a foreclosure and subsequent sale were invalid as a result of the foreclosing bank sending the borrowers a notice of default and acceleration of the debt before the bank had been assigned the mortgagIn the case discussed in the article, the District Court Appellate Division had ruled that a foreclosure and subsequent sale were invalid as a result of the foreclosing bank sending the borrowers a notice of default and acceleration of the debt before the bank had been assigned the mortgagin the article, the District Court Appellate Division had ruled that a foreclosure and subsequent sale were invalid as a result of the foreclosing bank sending the borrowers a notice of default and acceleration of the debt before the bank had been assigned the mortgage.

On 6 December 2017 in its judgement on the Coty Germany GmbH («Coty») case, the Court of Justice of the European Union («CJEU») ruled that suppliers of luxury goods may be able to prohibit the sale of their premium - branded products on...

Special rules apply in the case of distance sales and second - hand goods.

In this case between Lexmark International, a Chinese - owned laser printer and imaging product manufacturer, and Impression Products, a family - owned West Virginia printer and cartridge company, rules surrounding the first sale doctrine changed.

WASHINGTON — Planned Parenthood Federation of America President Cecile Richards released the following statement in response to a ruling in the Tummino v. Hamburg case lifting the age and point of sale restrictions on emergency contraception, citing solid scientific and medical research showing that it is safe and effective in preventing unintended pregnancy:

In a case that wasn't about real estate, but may still be of interest to sales reps using social media, a university ruled that students who made negative comments about a professor on Facebook had committed non-academic misconduct.

An Iowa appellate court ruled in the case Stewart v. All States Quality Foods, L.P. that a broker is entitled to his commission in a failed short sale of a warehouse because the lender acted in bad faith by waiting until closing to demand a larger share of the proceeds.

cseepe is describing a case where clearly the Seller, the Listing Brokerage, the Listing Sales Rep, The Co-operating brokerage and rep, the buyer and who ever supplied the opinions that resulted in the cseepe scenario example lacked any knowledge of the MLS rules and regs, legal precedent, forms and clauses, and even the simplest HST rules on when and how HST is to be remitted.

(Sec. 13303) This section modifies the rule providing for the nonrecognition of gain in the case of like - kind exchanges to limit the application of the rule to real property that is not held primarily for sale.

this is a related case where the ruling is that a personal judgment can't be satisfied by the seizure and sale of defendant's membership interests in a (one or more) LLC.

Yes, in that case, you would have to transfer the property out of the S corp to refinance it because fannie rules only allow mortgages in a person's name, and then that transfer out of the s corp is a «sale.»

One note to keep in mind is the stock could run low on any items they put on sale, so my usual rule of thumb is that if I would be sad to not get it, I go ahead and order it just in case:).