Sentences with phrase «same god for»

«Gott» in German... It is the same god for all 3 religions.

This in particular is a quick and easy way to instill doubt into the Christian faith altogether (As a Muslim, we believe in Jesus» prophecy but we believe that the book was corrupted and not preserved) Check out my post below on what the Quran says about Jesus but most importantly is that God is the same God for all civilizations (and only makes sense if He is the same, since we believe that He is FAIR).

Well, it goes back to the same question: Since both sides and their fans all generally pray to the same God for victory, is making an obvious point of thanking God for favoring your team because of your better performance just rubbing it in, thus const.ituting poor sportsmanship?

Not exact matches

In the same vein as «State of Decay 2,» the upcoming «Prey for the Gods» is a survival game steeped in mystery.

[14:18] Rules of the game to succeed, but not for fulfillment [14:40] God loves diversity; same is true with people — different sources of fulfillment [14:55] Success without fulfillment is the ultimate failure [16:53] We all have something different as our inner desire, you need to find what fulfills you [17:05] A cautionary tale: Robin Williams, the loss of a national treasure [18:42] He lit everybody up, except himself [19:15] Most of us live a life where we succeed but we're not truly fulfilled [20:10] Richard: Tony, what is your method for happiness?

At another point, he appeared dressed as Helios, the Greek sun god, wearing a green suit of armor designed by the same people who created the Iron Man costume for that movie.

athiests are angry at those who follow god, because we pay the same taxes, but your orginazations take a tax exempt status, commit illigal acts, but telling the followers how and who to vote for (violation of NPO status), then you b ** ch and moan when seculars want you taxed.

Would you accept the same claim being made for another god, that someone had faith in their being real, and that god sent a sign proving his or her existence

Science is not religion, it is a method of enquiry based upon direct observation which transcends religion (the laws of physics are the same for everyone, no matter how you name God or even whether you believe).

Articles like this are a dime a dozen with the same tired excuses for why people want church to be about them instead of about God and Jesus and God's Word.

Would you care to explain how it is that «primitive sheep herders» as most of you love to derogatorily call them were able to in and of themselves write scripture such that the first two books Genesis & Exodus spell TORAH = LAW for every equidistant letter sequence of the 50th letter... and does the same backwards HAROT for Numbers & Deuteronomy, and the 3rd book that they're pointing towards Leviticus, every 7th letter (7 is God's number for perfection) spells YHWH = The name of God.

This is the same God that I regretably believed actually burns people for all of eternity??? Someone a Christian holds onto «justice» and God being «perfect» to justify punishment without purpose?

The same goes for one of today's god terms: inclusive.

What you seem to be arguing for is a direct inputting of information into Luke's mind, which you are expecting me to take on faith when various cult leaders all claim to have the same link to God telling them to sleep with young girls, and so on.

In fact I thought that now more than ever the basic themes in the story are still the same: If we put all our trust in people, if we expect them to be God for us, then they will always disappoint us in some way.

You assert that proof for a god's existence is the same as proof that I have a great great great great grandmother.

It's his same old nonsense, and fails to make any case for his crazy god beliefs, just as it did previously.

Therefore without evidence it is safe for one to proceed as though there is no god, the same way it is safe to proceed as though there are no dragons, elves and goblins.Your attempt to cast atheism as a faith is a straw man fallacy and only goes to show that you are fundamentally irrational.

A bit of site googling demonstrates that «Live4Him» has copied and pasted the same «arguments» for his crazy god beliefs at least 5 times in the past few months.

Rick Perry is of the same religious ilk as GW Bush — and they both heard God tell them to run for President as did Michelle Bachmann.

But we... with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as by the Spirit of the Lord... looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith who for the joy that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God» 2Corinthians 3, Hebrews12)

For a group that constantly accuses athiests they cannont prove God does not exist, Christians sure love to do the same with facets of science.

Speaking for myself, although the same would be true for most of the others, I was working within a broadly Augustinian way of thinking about these matters» a tradition that sharply distinguishes between the city of God and the city of man, and insists that the one can never be transformed into the other.

He is eager to declare the Bible inaccurate, and that is equivalent to saying God is a liar, and saying that God can not be trusted, and saying that man has better answers, which is the same as deniers do, except for the ones who are afraid to admit their hate of God, and instead try to hide their hate behind ignorance and the atheism label.

Just as we tell our earthly friends how much we appreciate them and are thankful for them, we do the same with God — to the highest degree.

It's fine, Steve, for you to believe «unrepentant gays» (for example, people who choose to live as God created them, in committed same - sex relationships) are going to hell.

No, the problem this atheist has is that there is the same amount of evidence supporting the existence of god as there is for vampires, ghosts and UFOs.

I agree that most people will acknowledge that we do need God, however acknowledging that we need Him and actually acknowledging Him are not the same thing... if you know that you need Him though, that's a start... And I have a questions for you: why do you think we have this need?

For the same reason that god can't travel anywhere that humans don't take him.

Only one size... and God IS the same size for everybody!

In one poem, he addresses God wryly, saying, «It seems to me that people who can not believe in you / deserve your praise,» and he confesses later in the same poem, «I pray to you, for I do not know how not to pray.»

As far as the donating goes, if they want to donate to a church organization then that's fine but to donate to groups that stand against my right to live free and have the same rights as everyone else is this god for sacking country then that's just wrong.

But this is decidedly not the same proposition as that God in Christ transcends himself toward us, not unless the former proposition is used merely as a slogan for an explicit trinitarian unpacking of the latter.

If you ask some scientist, they would argue for science and others argue using the same evidence, for God.

Yeh man, like he told me the same thing... God appeared to me at the bowling alley the other day and told me not to vote for Perry»cause he's an idiot.

For example, God can not exist and not exist at the same time.

Rather you need to understand that when we say your god if immoral we are working with ethical premises that do not involve your god as a basis for defining morali and then on our ethical systems (which are not all the same) we are deeming your god immoral.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truFor me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that trufor how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that trufor now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

We would imprison such a parent for the same reason we should reject bible god.

We dismiss your god for the same reason you dismiss all the other thousands of gods created by man.

Russell argues that for the Fathers, the relationship between human beings and the Trinity was always «asymmetrical,» bringing together beings of «diverse ontological type» — the opposite of Mormon claims that God and humanity share the same ontology.

For us to sit here and make such authoritative statements on what happens after we die... well that would put us on the same level as being God, no?

You won't believe me or anyone else telling you much the same thing the bible tells you, and really, it's best if you get it direct from the bible, or God if you can convince him to do such for you... which is not likely if you reject him and don't believe anything he says or does.

Peter and Judas» sins were one and the same and it is in no way our place to say where they are, since we will only be giving an account for our own actions when we stand before God someday.

If you make the argument that God must be responsible for Creation, you imply, at the same time, that your God is also an amateurish buffoon bent on destruction.

Nineveh was due to be demolished by God for the same reason so God sent Jonah to warn them what would happen if they carried on — but THEY listened and changed their ways and were SAVED.

He's the same God, requiring repentance and faith for salvation and He serves up the same justice for those who do not repent — death.

«Millions of Americans are good with god» = horribly offensive and attacking paraphrased «My god will viciously torture you in fire for eternity after you die for not believing the same things I believe» = loving and inclusive

also the antichrist put a specific picture for every human god to be easier for him to persuade the followers that he is the same god they were waiting for as he will appear for every one of thos at the same time in different places with the same picture and with the same mirecles they belive in.

(St. Matthew 25:34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:) * Acts 16:17 The same followed Paul and us, and cried, saying, These men are the servants of the most high God, which shew unto us the way of salvation.