This final forfeiture is coming few days after
the same Judge ordered an interim forfeiture of properties worth $ 21,392,224 linked to the former minister.
Not exact matches
After the first executive
order was blocked in court and the president signed the second one, «Sean Spicer said all the principles remain the
same,» said
Judge Henry Floyd, referring to the White House spokesman.
When such charges are filed, a
judge issues a
same - day restraining
order and a hearing is scheduled for three weeks out to figure out a longer - term solution.
At a hearing today, a San Francisco Superior Court
judge lifted a temporary restraining
order against ListHub and the two companies reached an agreement to continue to provide a data feed to Trulia until April 7 — the
same day a syndication agreement between Zillow and ListHub ends.
Moreover, the
same order from
Judge Zobel also froze assets related to three relief defendants: Kimberly Renee Benge, Barbara Crater Meeks, and Erica Crater, all of whom have been linked to the company and whom allegedly received customer funds «without providing any legitimate services to clients and without any interest or entitlement to such customer funds.»
On Tuesday, the
judge set the
same bond for O'Neil, and
ordered them both to stay away from the campus.
A South Carolina
judge on Wednesday (Jan. 23) issued a temporary restraining
order that prevents the national church from using the name or seal of the diocese, which espouses a more traditional theology and disapproves of the national church's acceptance of
same - sex marriage and gay bishops.
At the
same hearing, Jamie McCourt will ask Superior Court
Judge Scott Gordon to
order the immediate sale of the team.
Yesterday, antigay chief justice of Alabama, Roy Moore, sent out an
order for the state's probate
judges to stop issuing marriage licenses for
same - sex couples.
Ryan is to appear Tuesday before
Judge Edwin Berman in Cook County Circuit Court to ask for the
same type of
order Berman issued Jan. 8 that
ordered cemeteries to permit burial of Jews who already own burial plots in the cemeteries affected by the strike and lockout.
However, on the
same day, the
judges on the Ninth Circuit Court, which upheld the first TRO in February, issued an opinion1 that the revised Executive
Order is constitutional.
The decision came the
same day a federal
judge made public an
order that Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal maintain Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood centers for 14 more days while the court considers plans to cut it off permanently.
However, IPOB, through its counsel, Ifeanyi Ejiofor in a motion before the
same judge on September 22, argued that the proscription
order was unconstitutional.
The
judge ordered that the civil servants must also show possession of a property within the FCT worth the
same amount.
Even after a federal
judge ordered Mr. Cuomo to declare a special election for a vacant Staten Island Congressional seat, party leaders did not foresee that Mr. Cuomo would decide that the federal election and state election would be held on the
same day, May 5.
The team challenging Proposition 8 needs to establish that gays are politically powerless in
order to have
Judge Walker give his toughest scrutiny to the stated purpose for the
same - sex marriage ban.
In addition to the prison time, Scarborough was also
ordered by a federal
judge to pay $ 54,355 in restitution to the state and to forfeit the
same amount to the United States, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said in a press release.
On Wednesday, a Kings County Supreme Court
judge ordered SUNY to keep staffing levels the
same as they were before SUNY Downstate announced its plan to close LICH.
The attention of EFCC was drawn to the suit before the Chief
Judge of Rivers state in Port Harcourt where an interlocutory
order was granted against the defendants and
same restrained them from further publishing the name of Secondus.
But in a motion filed by IPOB's lawyer, Mr. Ifeanyi Ejiofor, before the
same judge on Friday, the group contended that the proscription
order was unconstitutional.
The
judge said that since the prosecution counsel Mr. Oladipo Okpeseyi (SAN) did not object to the bail of the ex-NSA, the court has to affirm
same and
ordered the defendant to continue to enjoy the bail condition granted him in 2015 when he was first arraigned.
I am not sure if an intelligent buyer would go through all this trouble to buy the Titanic assets and also agree to the conditions set forth by the
Judge — agree to keep the collection together and also allow it to be displayed to the public occasionally - while at the
same time risking capital to earn enough revenue in
order to offset at least the cost of maintenance of the assets.
The Junior classes will then be
judged in the
same manner and
order as the puppy classes with the Best Brush - coat Junior Dog, Best Horsecoat Junior Dog, Best Brushcoat Junior Bitch and the Best Horsecoat Junior Bitch all competing for the title of Best Futurity Junior.
The
judge's
order for the tutorial came the
same day he denied (pdf) the cities» motion to remand the case to state court.
In Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60, [2016] 1 All ER 671 and Gohil v Gohil [2015] UKSC 61, [2016] 1 All ER 685, which were heard at the
same time, the Supreme Court had to balance the importance of finality in litigation — in both cases the parties had reached agreement on all matters and had obtained consent
orders approved by High Court
judges (albeit that the
order in Sharland had not been sealed); as against a material failure by a party to comply with their duty of disclosure.
Then, last week, the Alabama Supreme Court snubbed its nose at the federal court and
ordered the state's probate
judges to stop issuing marriage licenses to
same sex couples.
The defendants did not know that in
order to present evidence in a way that will be considered by a
judge, a party must do so either by testifying themselves in court, or call witnesses to do the
same.
When the appellate court received the Special Action Petition, the Court of Appeals
ordered both parties to file simultaneous briefs addressing whether the trial
judge had jurisdiction to issue its
order, since it addressed the
same subject on which the superior court had previously ruled.
However there is something that could be done to ameliorate the due process issues from how temporary hearings are currently conducted: authorize automatic de novo review [a review in which the temporary
order has no binding effect] of custody and support
orders 90 - 180 days after the temporary hearing, ideally with the
same judge conducting the review.
While the Court ultimately stuck with the status quo, the decision sets a precedent that will serve as a guide to
judges in future production
order cases faced with the
same issues.
Then in that
same death penalty case, the
judge held a hearing and
ordered the defendant into the courtroom by stating, «Bring his carcass out here.»
The parties whose accounts were the object of the
order learned of it because later last week the
same judge, at Twitter's request, unsealed the
order.
Meanwhile, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has issued an executive
order moving back deadlines for civil and criminal cases, and federal
judges have done the
same.
2 years later he was re-elected and put back on the Alabama Supreme Court to now defy a US Supreme Court
order on
same - sex marriage and
order state
judges to violate the Supreme Court ruling and not issue marriage licenses.
What's now clear, thanks to the
same judge's
order denying Cox's motion for a new trial, is that, whatever else she may be, Cox is running a protection racket.
-- break and enter: John Doe, [2007] B.C.J. B.C.J. No. 2111, 228 C.C.C. (3d) 302 (B.C.C.A.), acquittal set aside, new trial
ordered; accused testified that he had been fasting in the woods for 60 days when he entered the house to be warm and to eat; the trial
judge erred by not correctly applying the modified objective test to the first two components of the defence of necessity — the existence of an imminent peril or danger and the absence of any reasonable legal alternative, had to be assessed on a modified objective standard; the trial
judge erred by failing to determine whether the accused's perception of his situation, and the absence of any lawful alternatives, had an objectively reasonable foundation; the verdict would not necessarily have been the
same had the trial
judge properly applied the law on the defence of necessity.
In the
same case, Guliani the
judge ordered the transfer of real estate to the client of Guliani the lawyer, even though the estate's fiduciary had not requested such a transfer and Judge Guliani had made no finding that it was appropr
judge ordered the transfer of real estate to the client of Guliani the lawyer, even though the estate's fiduciary had not requested such a transfer and
Judge Guliani had made no finding that it was appropr
Judge Guliani had made no finding that it was appropriate.
Although I agree that the situation appears grim, I do believe that you can rely on the county court
judges to ignore the new allocation
order to almost the
same degree as they did the last one and almost to the
same degree as the district
judges are ignoring their new robes except for keeping their car radiators warm.
Without this evidence, I can not say that the trial
judge's conclusion would necessarily have been the
same... I would allow the appeal, set aside the convictions and
order a new trial (at paras. 102 and 104).
[43] A trial
judge can assess the appropriate magnitude of any reduction in arrears by considering the difference between the income on which the
order or agreement is based and the payor's actual income during the
same period.
The Arizona Court of Appeals in the case of Dougall v. Dougall held that those
same disability benefits may be considered by a trial
judge if he or she is determining how much to
order a spouse to pay towards alimony arrearages.
In light of this and other developments, the wife applied to a motions
judge for an
order that his ongoing child and spousal support obligations be converted to a lump - sum amount in the
same amount as the equalization payment would have been, i.e. $ 50,000.
A
judge of the Superior Court of Justice may review the bail
order (including a detention
order) made by another
judge of that
same court.
In A.A. v. Z.G., the court adjourned the portion of the husband's appeal related to spousal support until he complied with the trial
judge's
order regarding
same.
Despite its mootness, the Province advances the argument that the Court of Appeal should consider the issues on appeal so as to address the precedential value of the Chambers
Judge's
order and since other taxpayers will likely pursue the
same interim remedy.
A circuit
judge shall have the
same power to grant writs of habeas corpus within his circuit that a district
judge has within his district, and the
order of the circuit
judge shall be entered in the records of the district court of the district wherein the restraint complained of is had.»
On the affirming the chambers
judge's refusal to
order production from a non-party, the Court stated, «A chambers
judge has a discretion to refuse production of documents that are of marginal relevance where other documents relevant to the
same issue have already been produced: see Peter Scherle Holdings Ltd. v. Gibson Pass Resort Inc., 2007 BCSC 770.»
The presiding
judge decided to allow defence counsel to attend the first stage hearing in this case, but
ordered them to refrain from disclosing information revealed to anyone, including their clients, and to file written undertakings with the Court promising the
same.
IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED, pursuant to the foregoing enabling act and to the matters recited in the foregoing preface, that the annexed rules be and the
same hereby are adopted for the regulation of original and appellate civil practice and procedure in judicial proceedings in the district courts of the State of Nevada, and the forms annexed thereto approved; that the
same shall be effective on January 1, 1953; that publication thereof be made by the mailing of a printed copy by the clerk of this court to each member of the State Bar of Nevada according to the clerk's official list of membership of such Bar (which will include all district
judges and district attorneys), and that the certificate of the clerk of this court as to such mailing, not less than sixty days prior to January 1, 1953, shall be conclusive evidence of the adoption and publication of said rules in accordance with the provisions of said enabling act.
It Is Hereby
Ordered, pursuant to the provisions of NRS 2.120, that the annexed rules be and the
same hereby are adopted for the government of the Supreme Court of Nevada and the legal profession in this state; that the
same shall be effective on October 15, 1965; that publication thereof be made by the mailing of a printed copy by the clerk of this court to each member of the State Bar of Nevada according to the clerk's official list of membership of such Bar (which will include all district
judges) and to each justice of the peace and to each police
judge in this state, and that the certificate of the clerk of this court as to such mailing, not less than 30 days prior to October 15, 1965, shall be conclusive evidence of the adoption and publication of such rules in accordance with the provisions of NRS 2.120.