When introducing the teacher unions (NEA or AFT) into education discussions as an equal participant in the development of education policy, the assumption is that all unions are equal... which is
the same WRONG assumption we are making about teachers and student learning.
Not exact matches
It turns out the
assumption that all Internet users consume content the
same is
wrong.
Actually, Reich says, «the orthodoxy — the
assumption that present - day people are directly descended from the people who always lived in that
same area — is
wrong almost everywhere.»
Typically it's not the facts / numbers that are
wrong, but the conclusions drawn by either faulty / bias logic (such as the cholesterol myths) or via
assumptions based on other «facts» ascertained the
same way.
Most often these
assumptions are that the person views things the
same way that you do, which is more than likely
wrong since we don't get context and tone in text messages or email.
And, he says, it would be
wrong to criticize other ethnic groups on the
assumption that they don't support their children to the
same degree that Asian American parents do.
Even the
assumption that two planets at the
same temperature will have not NET radiative transfer is
wrong.
If you're using the
same assumptions for single and multi family properties, your numbers are
wrong.