Each evaluation study often uses a different model and / or data set, making it impossible to directly compare the performance and computational efficiency of various approaches that simulate
the same aerosol process.
Not exact matches
Aerosols are but one among many «basic physics»
processes occurring at the
same time, and the net result of all of these
processes working together is what translates into actual effects we can see taking place in real life.
I was told by one semi-expert climate scientist (someone who was in the
process of changing fields to climate science from a different numerical modeling field, as so possibly still catching up) that although globally
aerosols played the most important role in this period, there was also around the
same time period (maybe beginning slightly earlier?