Sentences with phrase «same argument they made»

Even with WWI, or even more so with Iraq I, where stronger cases can be for the importance of U.S. economic motivation, it becomes very hard to distinguish the «we must not let Germany control Europe» or «Iraq control the Gulf» - type argument made on geostrategic grounds, from the same argument made on economic grounds.

understand, the same argument made here, was made about other shows: whether Duck Dynasty or even Ellen Degeneres.

DeFrancisco said he is making the same argument he made in opposition to tax breaks for the Carousel Center mall as it grew into Destiny USA.

However, those same arguments made for that have also affirmed cutting the length of the book to compensate.

It's the same argument they made with registered retirement savings plans.

It's the same argument they make for fundamental indexing, where stocks are weighted according to their economic footprint.

I'm sick of seeing these same arguments made on gamefaqs every day!

I'm not sure how they make the same arguments I made in this post.

916, 74 L.Ed.2 d 74, the Supreme Court considered, and rejected, the same arguments made by this defendant, but in the context of federal constitutional guarantees.

Not exact matches

Back in 2014, an article in The New Yorker made the same argument.

But the other «factual circumstances» here make the argument less likely to hold up in the same way it did for Edwards.

He made the same argument while speaking to CNN.

I made the same argument more than two years ago in «20 reasons for ending Canada Post's monopoly.»

As we debate the pros and cons, we often get stuck rehashing the same arguments in lieu of making a choice.

«Any argument they make for keeping that in would result in the same kinds of legal challenges presented by Section 3 (c), which poses the question of, «Why have people from these countries been deemed more dangerous than others?»»

Many of the outlets that have given up on comments make the same arguments about why they did so, and one of the main ones is that social - media platforms like Twitter (twtr) and Facebook (fb) make comments unnecessary.

It might be possible to make a reasonable argument that Mr. Trudeau has done nothing wrong — the same ethics commissioner to whom the Harper government deferred on the matter of Nigel Wright's cheque seems to have cleared Mr. Trudeau to make the speeches he made between 2008 and 2012.

I would make the same argument for quality.

«You can make the same argument about the UK government funding anything or the US government funding anything,» he told the committee.

Compare a 4 % drop to the fact that unemployment grew across the country from around 4 % to almost 10 % in the same timeframe and you could make the argument that broker employment has actually held up better than that of most professions.

Admittedly, one could make the same argument about gold, but gold has been widely accepted by humankind as a thing of value for more than two - and - a-half thousand years — compared to less than a decade for bitcoin.

Many of the same arguments are made in favour of solar power — I hear this every time when I criticize Ontario for paying 80c / kWh for solar power.

I always answer that argument the same way I answered yours... OF COURSE people who get in early make the most money.

At the same Summit, Jim Rickards made a riveting presentation that laid out the argument that today, gold is, in fact, money.

I eat so much A&W I could make the same argument for buying them as you made for buying utilities.

These are precisely the same arguments that were made near the end of the 1920s and also in the late 1990s, as the dotcom bubble was about to implode.

Is an increase from 2.6 % of GDP in 1981 to 3.1 % of GDP in 2012 unsustainable?  Yes, I suppose so, if this rate of increase continues for another few centuries. The same argument the CFIB makes for municipal spending could be made for corporate profits but far moreso. After adjusting for inflation, corporate profits have increased by 245 % since 1992, doubling as a share of GDP and growing at a rate of ten times Canadaâ $ ™ s cumulative population growth of just 23 % since 1992.

That's the same, pointless argument that is always made.

MannaTi, the same arguments were NOT made against desegregation and women.

It's so NOT the same thing it's hard to believe someone capable of logging into a computer could make that argument.

Every person of every faith can make the same argument, and by that logic, it means EVERY god that has ever been posited should be accepted because there is no evidence to the contrary.

The same argument was made when african americans started playing white student in sports.

You can't make the same argument against evolution.

Same arguments were made over desegregation AND letting women serve.

If you're going to make the stupid argument that the term «belief» means the same thing whether it's applied to a god or the sun coming up, then argue with someone else.

(If that sounds familiar, it's because the same argument was made twenty - five years ago in the early stages of the battle over legalized abortion.)

If you make the argument that God must be responsible for Creation, you imply, at the same time, that your God is also an amateurish buffoon bent on destruction.

The same argument could be made for why men, especially white men, are superior to women and / or minorities; which clearly is not true.

Jake, the wild thing is that I hear Christians, Jews and Muslims that make the same «we are discriminated against» arguments.

@ Steven: the same sorts of arguments were made about the inherent goodness of man in the late 19th & early 20th century.

Of course they may end up disagreeing with Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth about the moral significance of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even make our argument for inclusion»?

You're making circular arguments, and you're also misusing the term «belief», applying to the same meaning as «faith».

If you hate them in the same way that you condemn them for being, it makes you no better than the Stereotypes you portrayed in your comment, so grow up, and use a logical argument, instead of the very hate Democrats decry, and the Tea Party embraces.

The «Moral Majority» Christian right made these exact same kinds of arguments last century when it came to inter-racial marriage.

No Bobcat, my argument is the same as the one made by Texas Shell which you seemed to understand.

If you hate them in the same way that you condemn them for being, it makes you no better than the Stereotypes you portrayed in your comment, so grow up, and use a logical argument, instead of the very hate Democrats decry, and the Tea Party embraces.Hate against any group of people you dis - agree is still hate and is not tolerable in my opinion.

Try making the same argument for Santa Claus.

As for the claim that if one simply waits long enough with an open heart, God will reveal Himself — that same argument is made by just about every religion.

Or do you believe the pharmacy must be forced to rehire the pharmacist, as the Christians demanded (using your very same argument) when this made news?

I read two articles last year (which I didn't document, like you, thinking it was out of the question) about pedophiles making the exact same argument as the present day argument that homosexuals have taken from the cause of the Black people; «they were born that way.»