Sentences with phrase «same argument was made»

The same argument was made with paperbacks and straight to dvd movies, «there will be so many the market will flood», and yet before Amazon it was hard for me to find a good book to read, and I still can't find enough good movies, lol.

The same argument was made for algebra and other areas of advanced mathematics.

(The same argument was made — successfully — in response to the Obama jobs plan by Sen. Chuck Schumer).

The same argument was made against interracial marriage.

(If that sounds familiar, it's because the same argument was made twenty - five years ago in the early stages of the battle over legalized abortion.)

The same argument was made when african americans started playing white student in sports.

Many of the same arguments are made in favour of solar power — I hear this every time when I criticize Ontario for paying 80c / kWh for solar power.

Same arguments were made over desegregation AND letting women serve.

As for the claim that if one simply waits long enough with an open heart, God will reveal Himself — that same argument is made by just about every religion.

The same arguments were made about interracial couples.

He says the same arguments were made when the CPP was introduced in the 1960s, insisting «they were wrong then and are wrong now.»

The same argument is made (but less dominantly) for other renewables.

If we look back over the film, we can see exactly the same argument being made here, as were made by Naomi Oreskes in her «Tobacco Strategy» thesis: there were a small bunch who viciously and nastily attacked a bunch of nice scientists, and who cast doubt over well established scientific truths in order to control the media, and influence the public.

They are in all reality making the same argument you are making, that all the other models have made an error.

I talked to them about the Wegman case, and advanced the same arguments being made by the «skeptics».

The same arguments are made by all those fighting against science, whether they be those who fight against the theory of evolution or what have you.

Could this same argument be made for a person who has been in pre-trial release a number of months / years, to be given time served?

It's the same argument you're making.

Not exact matches

«Any argument they make for keeping that in would result in the same kinds of legal challenges presented by Section 3 (c), which poses the question of, «Why have people from these countries been deemed more dangerous than others?»»

Many of the outlets that have given up on comments make the same arguments about why they did so, and one of the main ones is that social - media platforms like Twitter (twtr) and Facebook (fb) make comments unnecessary.

It might be possible to make a reasonable argument that Mr. Trudeau has done nothing wrong — the same ethics commissioner to whom the Harper government deferred on the matter of Nigel Wright's cheque seems to have cleared Mr. Trudeau to make the speeches he made between 2008 and 2012.

Admittedly, one could make the same argument about gold, but gold has been widely accepted by humankind as a thing of value for more than two - and - a-half thousand years — compared to less than a decade for bitcoin.

At the same Summit, Jim Rickards made a riveting presentation that laid out the argument that today, gold is, in fact, money.

These are precisely the same arguments that were made near the end of the 1920s and also in the late 1990s, as the dotcom bubble was about to implode.

Is an increase from 2.6 % of GDP in 1981 to 3.1 % of GDP in 2012 unsustainable?  Yes, I suppose so, if this rate of increase continues for another few centuries. The same argument the CFIB makes for municipal spending could be made for corporate profits but far moreso. After adjusting for inflation, corporate profits have increased by 245 % since 1992, doubling as a share of GDP and growing at a rate of ten times Canadaâ $ ™ s cumulative population growth of just 23 % since 1992.

That's the same, pointless argument that is always made.

MannaTi, the same arguments were NOT made against desegregation and women.

It's so NOT the same thing it's hard to believe someone capable of logging into a computer could make that argument.

Every person of every faith can make the same argument, and by that logic, it means EVERY god that has ever been posited should be accepted because there is no evidence to the contrary.

If you're going to make the stupid argument that the term «belief» means the same thing whether it's applied to a god or the sun coming up, then argue with someone else.

If you make the argument that God must be responsible for Creation, you imply, at the same time, that your God is also an amateurish buffoon bent on destruction.

The same argument could be made for why men, especially white men, are superior to women and / or minorities; which clearly is not true.

Jake, the wild thing is that I hear Christians, Jews and Muslims that make the same «we are discriminated against» arguments.

@ Steven: the same sorts of arguments were made about the inherent goodness of man in the late 19th & early 20th century.

Of course they may end up disagreeing with Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth about the moral significance of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even make our argument for inclusion»?

You're making circular arguments, and you're also misusing the term «belief», applying to the same meaning as «faith».

If you hate them in the same way that you condemn them for being, it makes you no better than the Stereotypes you portrayed in your comment, so grow up, and use a logical argument, instead of the very hate Democrats decry, and the Tea Party embraces.

No Bobcat, my argument is the same as the one made by Texas Shell which you seemed to understand.

If you hate them in the same way that you condemn them for being, it makes you no better than the Stereotypes you portrayed in your comment, so grow up, and use a logical argument, instead of the very hate Democrats decry, and the Tea Party embraces.Hate against any group of people you dis - agree is still hate and is not tolerable in my opinion.

Or do you believe the pharmacy must be forced to rehire the pharmacist, as the Christians demanded (using your very same argument) when this made news?

I read two articles last year (which I didn't document, like you, thinking it was out of the question) about pedophiles making the exact same argument as the present day argument that homosexuals have taken from the cause of the Black people; «they were born that way.»

Even with WWI, or even more so with Iraq I, where stronger cases can be for the importance of U.S. economic motivation, it becomes very hard to distinguish the «we must not let Germany control Europe» or «Iraq control the Gulf» - type argument made on geostrategic grounds, from the same argument made on economic grounds.

The same argument could be made that material didn't «come» from anything.

Supporting Sharia law is the same argument the catholic church is making, just from a different cult.

The same argument could be made about the entire bible — being that it's an assembly of writings from unverifiable authors... just say «n.

But a compelling philosophical argument can be made for the view that gay is not good, which means that it should be considered a disease in the same way as all the other sexual disorders in the DSM.

I think it's ludicrous that an argument even has to be made that «not all Muslims are the same».

Their argument seems to imply they don't share that empathy... they are ultimately worried about being punished, in the end I don't truly believe they don't share the same empathy, but it is funny that is a logical conclusion to make from their position.

Your argument is just like that of Brahmins in my country who used to scare people that solar eclipse occurs bcoz we made the gods angry and lightning strikes for the same reason.

The first and most obvious is that what he has to say captures so well the essence of the revisionist argument, and second it makes clear that the argument of the revisionists is the same whether they are speaking of heterosexual or homosexual relations.