Sentences with phrase «same argument would»

If we're going to argue that Spencer is unqualified because of his beliefs regarding ID, the same argument would fit those who blindly believe in CAGW.

The Krauss / Shermer side sounds incredibly familiar... almost as if those same arguments have been pasted here (ad nauseum) but without crediting the originators.

The same argument has appeared in Matthew concerning the healing ofa man with a withered hand (12:11 - 12).

This demand of the prophetic school for humaneness is seen in Deuteronomy's plea for mercy to slaves because the Hebrews had themselves been slaves in Egypt, (Deuteronomy 15:15 [the same argument had already been made earlier, in the Book of the Covenant, Exodus 22:21.]-RRB-

«We believe this opinion will be overturned, since four prior challenges to the constitutionality of the law making the same argument have been dismissed,» he said.

If we are going to oppose things we have to put something else in its place, because if we carry on making the same arguments we have done over the last five years we will get the same result.

The same argument has been made about glucose in the brain, and we all know that the brain actually needs only a very small amount of glucose, if β - hydroxybutyrate is in good supply.

I will be honest, I've been waiting for some publisher to start backing out of library programs using the same argument they have about not allowing e-book lending — that allowing someone to walk into a library and borrow a book is costing the publisher sales.

Same argument has been made since before the X1X was announced.

You don't get to apologize and then still be obnoxious, especially when you're going to be obnoxious by repeating the same argument you've been whining about for months.

1) This is the same argument I have heard regarding medical research («If somebody cured cancer, all the funding for cancer researchers would dry up.»).

This same argument has been debunked time and time again.

Obama dismissed those critics, noting the same arguments have been used in the past when the U.S. has taken other steps to protect the environment.

Now the President makes the same argument they've been standing up to!

«These same arguments would also bode well for smaller firms, which can implement these types of measures more flexibly and provide cost - effective service.

It's the same argument I've been making for well over a year now with regard to smartwatches.

To be fair, that's the same argument I've made with Amazon Echo.

Not exact matches

Part of Sessions» argument in favor of rescinding the program was economic; he said it had adversely impacted native born Americans «It also denied jobs to hundreds of thousands of Americans by allowing those same jobs to go to illegal aliens,» he said.

The basic premise of the argument Keynes had with his peers is the same as the one today.

Now, you know, the tables have turned — kind of the same argument on the other side.

The after - tax income of state residents would, the argument goes, be the same as under the old federal tax law.

«Any argument they make for keeping that in would result in the same kinds of legal challenges presented by Section 3 (c), which poses the question of, «Why have people from these countries been deemed more dangerous than others?»»

Many of the outlets that have given up on comments make the same arguments about why they did so, and one of the main ones is that social - media platforms like Twitter (twtr) and Facebook (fb) make comments unnecessary.

It might be possible to make a reasonable argument that Mr. Trudeau has done nothing wrong — the same ethics commissioner to whom the Harper government deferred on the matter of Nigel Wright's cheque seems to have cleared Mr. Trudeau to make the speeches he made between 2008 and 2012.

The same issue has come up recently with demands from mega-givers not to have to disclose their giving on the argument that they're likely to be criticized or «vilified» or «intimidated.»

I would make the same argument for quality.

Compare a 4 % drop to the fact that unemployment grew across the country from around 4 % to almost 10 % in the same timeframe and you could make the argument that broker employment has actually held up better than that of most professions.

The main argument appears to be that the loopwhole allows the corporate professional to earn the same amount as an employed individual since a corporate professional does not have paid vacation or an employer pension.

Admittedly, one could make the same argument about gold, but gold has been widely accepted by humankind as a thing of value for more than two - and - a-half thousand years — compared to less than a decade for bitcoin.

Neal and Taylor's argument was rooted in math: there were more consumers than there were IT users, which meant that over the long run the rate of improvement in consumer technologies would exceed that of enterprise - focused ones; IT departments needed to grapple with increased demand from their users to use the same technology they used at home.

Gawker had written an article challenging his argument, similar to an article from The Washington Post and others on the same topic.

Is an increase from 2.6 % of GDP in 1981 to 3.1 % of GDP in 2012 unsustainable?  Yes, I suppose so, if this rate of increase continues for another few centuries. The same argument the CFIB makes for municipal spending could be made for corporate profits but far moreso. After adjusting for inflation, corporate profits have increased by 245 % since 1992, doubling as a share of GDP and growing at a rate of ten times Canadaâ $ ™ s cumulative population growth of just 23 % since 1992.

If you followed the argument then this means for the same amount «invested» / gambled the binary option has an implicit leverage that can be higher than the explicit leverage on the forex product.

No hard feelings, I would write the same thing if you would have said the same type of argument against a Muslim, Jew, Atheist, etc..

Every person of every faith can make the same argument, and by that logic, it means EVERY god that has ever been posited should be accepted because there is no evidence to the contrary.

Sigh... same old lame argument from people who do not understand history or have been indoctrinated by the David Barton school of revisionism.

A bit of site googling demonstrates that «Live4Him» has copied and pasted the same «arguments» for his crazy god beliefs at least 5 times in the past few months.

Funny how IDers don't claim to be creationists, yet both have the EXACT same language and interpretation of evolutionary theory verbatim, go to the same church, watch the same videos, use the same arguments, vote for the same leaders, listen to the same pastors, and quote the same scripture, etc...

Your argument about God being responsible directly or indirectly in the negative events of our world would be the same regardless.

Why is it that you only have the same pathetic arguments and tactics?

That is the same question around which Stanley Hauerwas of Duke University and I have been conducting a friendly argument for years and years.

But unless you have an alternative that meets the same criteria as your passionate argument against religion I can not understand the logic in believing in nothing.

that; s a nonsensical argument b / c a compentent doctor can prescribe hormones that have the same effect.

Christians have the same argument.

But if you are looking for consilience, in which multiple lines of independent evidence converge on the same target, then Schwartz's argument is a good one to have in your arsenal, for it fits nicely with biological arguments for intelligent design (cf. Michael Behe's Darwin's Black Box), recent philosophical work on mental causation (cf. Robert Koons» Realism Regained), cosmological fine - tuning (cf. John Barrow and Frank Tipler's The Anthropic Cosmological Principle), and consciousness studies (cf. Dean Radin's The Conscious Universe).

... well the same logic applys to god... i enjoy dropping these logic bombs on people and see how they react and hope that maybe that logic bomb will eventually set up a chain reaction in their consciousness... or maybe I am an egotistical f c k who just likes to have an unassaiable argument which with to beat others over the head with... maybe I am wrong to do so because the Human Condition is so cold and bleak in its finality that people need the cushion of god to go on with their everyday lives.

Chad, your issue is you keep trotting out the same tired arguments as if they haven't been answered and then decide that god is the only way to answer your questions.

The analysis of these texts will be much shorter than the analysis of the flood in Genesis 6 — 8 because explaining all the texts in detail would simply mean that many of the same arguments and ideas presented as an explanation for one text would simply be repeated in an explanation for a different text.

johnny you need a better argument than the same ill - informed hogwash you have read or heard from «progressive thinkers.»

We have not mounted philosophical arguments that prove Christ is really present in the Eucharist despite appearances, or that He is wholly present in each part of each consecrated host; nor have we proved, from reason alone, that He is really present in a consecrated host in the Cathedral of Tokyo and Paris at the same time.