Sentences with phrase «same argument you presented»

Not exact matches

«Any argument they make for keeping that in would result in the same kinds of legal challenges presented by Section 3 (c), which poses the question of, «Why have people from these countries been deemed more dangerous than others?»»

The analysis of these texts will be much shorter than the analysis of the flood in Genesis 6 — 8 because explaining all the texts in detail would simply mean that many of the same arguments and ideas presented as an explanation for one text would simply be repeated in an explanation for a different text.

We have not mounted philosophical arguments that prove Christ is really present in the Eucharist despite appearances, or that He is wholly present in each part of each consecrated host; nor have we proved, from reason alone, that He is really present in a consecrated host in the Cathedral of Tokyo and Paris at the same time.

If you want to have a serious debate, you'll have to start engaging with the facts and arguments that have been presented rather than merely ignoring them and restating the same old arguments that you seem so desperate to believe.

I read two articles last year (which I didn't document, like you, thinking it was out of the question) about pedophiles making the exact same argument as the present day argument that homosexuals have taken from the cause of the Black people; «they were born that way.»

While Matthew is essentially just presenting the same arguments various biblical scholars have been making for decades, he summarized the position so well, it's worth sharing for discussion.

Neil Addison also presented a set of arguments against the introduction of same - sex «marriages».

Infidelity — same as above, but a bit more interesting, given the arguments presented.

But what I detect in it is the work of someone who was never all that interested in investigating the arguments on either side of the same - sex marriage debate; whose scant interest in it has now been fully exhausted, both intellectually and morally; and whose present conclusions hover in mid-air without anything to support them other than a wistful regret that he has lost a hoedown partner in a gay man who has come fairly unglued over the issue.

It is quite clear that a book subjected to attacks like this from a man like Luther begins with a handicap, although Calvin was perfectly right when he said that he saw nothing in James to criticize, because it was quite unreasonable to expect every man to present the argument for Christianity and Christ in exactly the same way

Look at how the authors construct their arguments and try to use this same structure to present your own data.

but at the same time, it is hard to present the pro-war side fairly when many of their arguments are obviously absurd, callous or evidence of their desire to mitigate their sense of loss, embarassment, or guilt.

The majority of arguments for single - sex schools and classrooms focus on the effects on interactions among students, but they also present the possibility of greatly increasing the number of students with teachers of the same gender.

At the same time, he will present a chapter of his recent project «Introductory Logic Tutorial Video» (2010), specially adapted to London's context; each chapter is a double canvas mimicking a television screen, and depicting «a still from a non-existent video tutorial which taught basic propositional philosophical logic, and focused on certain defined «structures of argument»».

And for those of you who want to insist that aerosols produced by the uncontrolled burning of coal neutralized the effects of AGW from 1940 to 1979, please explain how the same argument could not be made for the effects of coal - induced aerosols during this earlier period, when no constraints on the polluting effects of coal combustion were present at all.

This presents the opposing argument to the same readers.

We are extremely proud this year to be presenting our Great Friend of Justice award to Mary L. Bonauto, the civil rights lawyer whose powerful arguments and long - term legal strategies have led to historic strides in achieving marriage equality for same - sex couples across the United States.

On the other hand and on the same day, the GC issued its Judgment of 10 October 2012 in case Case T - 569 / 10 Bimbo v OHMI — Panrico (BIMBO DOUGHNUTS), where the challenger of OHIM's decision contended, among other grounds for appeal, that OHIM had not expressly addressed some of the arguments presented during the trademark review procedure.

In Russian Federation v Shuppe [2017], DJ Grant rejected an extraneous considerations argument on the basis that there was no direct evidence presented of the requested person's political opinions, despite ruling at the same time that the extradition request was motivated by the Russian regime's continuing preoccupation with a recognised political figure and his close connection with the requested person.

At the same time, states like California, Colorado and Delaware have made the electronic filing of court documents mandatory, which not only helps drive the reality of the paperless law office forward, but also accounts for why more and more mobile devices are being used in the courtroom to present evidence or advance arguments.

In this case, the Board could participate without compromising the principles of finality and impartiality (at paras. 60 - 62) and, although Rothstein J. sounded a «note of caution» about the Board's suggestion that even if it lost on judicial review it would reach the same result in fresh proceedings, he felt «the Board generally acted in such a way as to present helpful argument in an adversarial but respectful manner» (at para. 72).