Sentences with phrase «same arguments i used»

Should one invoke the same arguments used in the debate over abortion, or is this a separate issue?

THAT makes gay marriages inherently detrimental to society, the VERY same argument used by pro-gay to prohibit polygamy, which BTW, is ALSO being proposed as an alternate definition of marriage.

Those are all the same arguments I used to use also.

Its funny how the same arguments used against Scientology can invariably be applied to any other philosophy.

Ironically, during a recent debate in Parliament on dangerous dogs, I was struck that the same arguments used in opposition to microchipping horses were now being deployed against the suggestion that dogs should also be chipped.

This is precisely the same argument used by the global warming fundamentalists whose delusions threaten to cost the world trillions of dollars.

It's the same argument I used for JD Supra on the web: don't just tell me you're an expert, back it up.

In fact, the same arguments used by MDP opponents (core values will be eroded and non-lawyers will do bad things — all without a shred of proof) have been been dusted off and recycled by ABS opponents.

Weeks after China, South Korea decided to ban ICOs in the same way and with the same arguments used by the Chinese government.

After the deal closed, John demanded payment but Ludy relied on the same argument used by Li in Geofre: the consultant is not licensed under REBBA so the action should be stayed.

Not exact matches

As the argument goes, we put guards with guns in banks to stop thieves, so why not use that same strategy to protect our children?

The same argument was used by southern states to defend segregation during the Civil Rights Era, but state's rights factor into issues as diverse as same sex marriage and speed limits.

Cornyn said the Trump administration's rationale for the tariffs — that cheap imports threaten the nation's national security — establishes a slippery slope that could end in trade partners using the same argument to tax U.S. exports.

For starters, you can use it as a way to list the pros and cons of each side of an argument, much in the same way that ProCon.org does for major and controversial political issues (see my example below).

This is the same argument that he used to delay the 2015 budget to late April.

Demographics are indicating more university spaces becoming avaialble over next 8 years (already started in eastern Canada) as well as labour shortages for younger people (Foote) and generally better things ahead using same arguments by Dent.lt looks like we are headed for BOOM times which will really get going by 2020.

Neal and Taylor's argument was rooted in math: there were more consumers than there were IT users, which meant that over the long run the rate of improvement in consumer technologies would exceed that of enterprise - focused ones; IT departments needed to grapple with increased demand from their users to use the same technology they used at home.

Fast - forward to today, same argument that James Damore, an engineer at Google, uses...

Many of the lawsuits use the same arguments that led to the cancellation of the Northern Gateway Pipeline in 2016.

Funny how IDers don't claim to be creationists, yet both have the EXACT same language and interpretation of evolutionary theory verbatim, go to the same church, watch the same videos, use the same arguments, vote for the same leaders, listen to the same pastors, and quote the same scripture, etc...

Not only is this illogical but the same argument can be used to «prove» virtually anything.

If you hate them in the same way that you condemn them for being, it makes you no better than the Stereotypes you portrayed in your comment, so grow up, and use a logical argument, instead of the very hate Democrats decry, and the Tea Party embraces.

If you hate them in the same way that you condemn them for being, it makes you no better than the Stereotypes you portrayed in your comment, so grow up, and use a logical argument, instead of the very hate Democrats decry, and the Tea Party embraces.Hate against any group of people you dis - agree is still hate and is not tolerable in my opinion.

I use many of the same arguments as you, but went with «week» for sabbatwn.

my POINT is that one can NOT use the argument «they do not choose to get beaten and killed» cause the same thing happenes to us and we can use that excuse as well..

Persuaded that no biblical or theological arguments for same - sex relations have survived his initial blasts, Gagnon conducts a mopping - up operation using biological and social - scientific data.

Or do you believe the pharmacy must be forced to rehire the pharmacist, as the Christians demanded (using your very same argument) when this made news?

When I was an atheist, I used the same argument.

It will be interesting to see if all those in favor of Gay marriage will use the same arguments to support a marriage between three people.

Using the argument that «atheists can be dogmatic, too» doesn't mean that we are playing on the same field.

If you are arguing that the world must be perfect in order to stop adoption, you are using the same argument that a slaveowner would have had in the South in the early 1800s — that slavery could not be stopped until no one went hungry.

He killed millions with the same argument you're using.

Did they apply the same arguments against the British king and parliament that they used against the French?

I only say that to say that if you are allowed your argument what prevents others from using the same argument about actions they don't want classified as sin.

So if what Jesus said to Philip can't be used to teach us about the nature and character of God because it's historical narrative, then this same argument applies to every text in the Bible, and you can also not use anything from the Law, the Writings, the Prophets, the Gospels, or the Epistles.

Yet again I am so amused by the popular atheists who flock to articles like this to throw out words like «dumb» «stupid» «idiots» «morons» and then use same overused arguments proposed by authors such as Dawkins, Hitchens and Harris.

«Your argument is totally hypocritical, because to people like you, it's ok to enforce laws you LIKE using extreme force, but it's «unjust» to enforce laws you DO N'T like in the same way.»

Since they use the same round size (5.56 mm /.223 caliber), I think we can stop there with your argument.

I bet your defenses will crumble under questioning and you will fall back on the same tired arguments that all christians seem to use when cornered.

Pedophiles are using the exact same argument.

Your argument is just like that of Brahmins in my country who used to scare people that solar eclipse occurs bcoz we made the gods angry and lightning strikes for the same reason.

They say we can't prove or disprove God but the same exact argument could be used for invisible unicorns.

Oh, look, Mark uses the same nonsensical argument yet again, in an attempt to prove that a fetus has the same rights as a person.

do you use that same argument for the mentally disabled?

i just know i use these same arguments A LOT — because a lot of atheists don't seem to want to read other atheists... which makes me wonder if they really know what they believe.

You are using the same argument that all Jehova's witnesses use when they claim that Jesus is not God.

To critics of biblical inerrancy, it sounds like we Christians are making the same argument as this man uses: Is this what we do with Scripture?

To me the most annoying people are the far right extreme evangelistic christians and the far left atheist (both rude, intolerant (despite the atheist usually preaching tolerance), and unwilling to think for themselves (despite making the argument over and over they do by using the same tired lines).

You're using the same argument that prejudice people used when trying to block African Americans and women civil rights.

Both use the same choral argument to help get the addressee into bed.