Sentences with phrase «same arguments like»

Initially, Mercedes has promoting the same arguments like BMW today.

Not exact matches

Many of the outlets that have given up on comments make the same arguments about why they did so, and one of the main ones is that social - media platforms like Twitter (twtr) and Facebook (fb) make comments unnecessary.

Demographics are indicating more university spaces becoming avaialble over next 8 years (already started in eastern Canada) as well as labour shortages for younger people (Foote) and generally better things ahead using same arguments by Dent.lt looks like we are headed for BOOM times which will really get going by 2020.

... well the same logic applys to god... i enjoy dropping these logic bombs on people and see how they react and hope that maybe that logic bomb will eventually set up a chain reaction in their consciousness... or maybe I am an egotistical f c k who just likes to have an unassaiable argument which with to beat others over the head with... maybe I am wrong to do so because the Human Condition is so cold and bleak in its finality that people need the cushion of god to go on with their everyday lives.

I read two articles last year (which I didn't document, like you, thinking it was out of the question) about pedophiles making the exact same argument as the present day argument that homosexuals have taken from the cause of the Black people; «they were born that way.»

Singer, by the same argument, may seem like a monster, but he is the one whose philosophy saves both animals and malnourished children.

Yet again I am so amused by the popular atheists who flock to articles like this to throw out words like «dumb» «stupid» «idiots» «morons» and then use same overused arguments proposed by authors such as Dawkins, Hitchens and Harris.

«Your argument is totally hypocritical, because to people like you, it's ok to enforce laws you LIKE using extreme force, but it's «unjust» to enforce laws you DO N'T like in the same way.&ralike you, it's ok to enforce laws you LIKE using extreme force, but it's «unjust» to enforce laws you DO N'T like in the same way.&raLIKE using extreme force, but it's «unjust» to enforce laws you DO N'T like in the same way.&ralike in the same way.»

Your argument is just like that of Brahmins in my country who used to scare people that solar eclipse occurs bcoz we made the gods angry and lightning strikes for the same reason.

Just because pro-choice advocates make these arguments does not mean that courts (the same courts that are ready to overrule Roe) are likely to discover abortion rights under a statute that does not even mention abortion and that was enacted with the support of pro-life groups like the National Association of Evangelicals and the Mormon Church.

If we're talking about the same universe, then you can conclude anything you like from that argument.

To critics of biblical inerrancy, it sounds like we Christians are making the same argument as this man uses: Is this what we do with Scripture?

no no no, i first engage them in a conversation... normally ending badly due to them not liking my choice of argument or tools i use in a conversation over belief... so in short i am norally the one insulted and left to think... which i believe is the same way children act when they hear the word «NO»... but i have had some great conversations with people over religion, its just a rare thing.

Indeed, an argument could be made that at no time since the First Great Awakening have so many churches of disparate denominational, theological and stylistic approaches been so united in terms of their music: one can now walk into old - line Pentecostal churches, small - town evangelical congregations, mall - like suburban megachurches, and many a mainline Protestant sanctuary across the country on any given Sunday morning and hear the same hymns and choruses done in approximately the same musical styles, with similar settings and instrumentation.

With cases like this, more often than not the argument is that a misconception of a threat is not enough to warrant the same judgement as the threat itself.

I like how you don't «want to argue» and then in the same sentence start and argument by insulting atheists.

Alfred North Whitehead once observed that it is the business of the future to be dangerous (not because the future is perverse but because it doesn't know how to be anything else), and whether we like it or not, the argument now in progress in Moscow and Jerusalem and Islamabad is the same argument that enlivened the annals of republican Rome, built the scaffolds of the Spanish Inquisition, and gave rise to the American Revolution.

He keeps making this same flawed argument, like his other flawed arguments, over and over in hopes that his audience will get tired of giving the routine refutation and let his comments slide, which he takes as a «win», also like Craig.

It is quite clear that a book subjected to attacks like this from a man like Luther begins with a handicap, although Calvin was perfectly right when he said that he saw nothing in James to criticize, because it was quite unreasonable to expect every man to present the argument for Christianity and Christ in exactly the same way

Bradley's argument (like those of many of Mill's critics3) depends on the following two assumptions: (1) Pleasure is a unitary concept, that is, pleasure is the very same feature in every pleasant experience.

I've run into that same argument, and like you, I am quite convinced that Jesus had to learn just as we do.

If you can approach things that would normally be considered outside the realm of science, like art for instance, in the same logical way, then the fact that beauty is only a matter of opinion should be able to have the same logical geometric proof like argument supporting that «fact».

I would ask for proof of this unsupportable argument of yours, but it seems like every time religion gets cornered by logic, it lashes out with the same rhetoric: «Non-believers don't understand.»

injuries [parlour said our training techniques were the same as from 2004] not having a world - class CF (cavani, suarez, rvp,...), very thin defence & some teenagers in it, no CDM until recently, i want to like wenger, but i think what he does is always a bit short, why not spend a bit more to buy defenders (i don't buy his argument that they are hard to get; the solution is almost always money), favoritism to some players (wilshere..)

@blastgunner the silence from my part is not due to a lack of arguments but to the simple fact that i, m tired of trying to explain how unfounded, weak... your comments are the same way i, m, tired of reading the same old invalid arguments being used, rehashed, borrowed from some sites like caughtoffside or some lazy pundits who love to use the same old cliches without anything to back it up!!

Maybe a bit of coaching to our existing defenders would help.But no arguments - We have been very inconsistent defensively all season.Solid and disciplined against Chelsea then defend like Amateurs 4 days later with the same line up against modest (to say the least) opposition.Totally sums up Arsenal.

another argument could be that wenger did the same stupid stuff when he stuck players like eduardo and arshavin on the wing; the dude is pretty old to be learning new stuff (did i just age discriminate?).

One thing that's for sure is Liverpool fans like to reignite the same arguments almost as though there's a rota they have to stick to.

As Hatch notes, the cohabiting couples she interviewed look and act a lot like married couples, with the same concerns and arguments, shared responsibilities (including in some cases children) and yes, even commitment.

Unfortunately like any other argument of feeding babies this could potentially have the same damming argument of breastfeeding vs. Formula feeding.

I can understand an argument that having the baby sleep in the same room might be helpful, because there could be things that you don't hear on a baby monitor, but other than that, it all sounds like complete nonsense.

Imaginary religious arguments, like those used by the sentencing judge in Loving, should not be used to bar faithful couples, of whatever race or gender, from the same civil institution of marriage that the majority enjoy.

The tobacco industry is using the same tired arguments against plain packaging as with smokefree law — namely that it would have a major impact on small businesses like me.

As the head of the BMA, Dr Hamish Meldrum, explained in May 2011, what's happening today is «almost part of the same argument, the same battle if you like, the same disagreement on how best to organise and make the NHS run more efficiently».

Across the country, local officials like Rita McCarthy make the same argument to explain why taxpayers should subsidize large, successful corporations: otherwise, they will move, or expand, elsewhere.

But the NDC Minority has downplayed this argument saying the agreement as existed in the past, did not have the same clauses like the current one that gives the US unlimited access to Ghana's military facilities.

The logic of this argument is that the left should just crawl away and die, or (same difference) schmooze its way into the New Labour hierarchy, as Galloway would clearly like to do.

At first glance, intelligent design looks like the same argument that evolution's foes have made since 1859, when Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species: Only a divine intelligence could have created something as complex as life on Earth.

guest: I haven't watched «Cereal Killers», however I would bet that it uses the exact same arguments and «information» that you get from books like Grain Brain and Wheat Belly and any ole paleo or atkins type site.

«The same concepts that I teach married couples, like how to bring out the best in your partner, how to create romance, how to minimize conflict, how to make up after an argument — these kinds of ideas are important in the dating process, as well as when you're married,» Gray said.

Life's too short it's better with two, I may look antique but unique, I am sincere caring loyal kind considerate, I don't like arguments prefer to discuss and solve things.I would treat my partner with 100 % respect and as an equal, I can but ask for same in return.I love life, I like like...

The «same old, same old» argument gets crushed here, because like Part 1, Part 2 departs from formula.

Based on the novel by Shûsaku Endô about a pair of 17th century Jesuit priests who travel to Japan to locate their missing mentor, «Silence» attempts to tackle big ideas like faith and sacrifice but never really makes it beyond its opening argument, like a broken record playing different variations of the same scene over and over again.

But this isn't how Hollywood likes or understands its Brits, I think, and the Oscar is almost certainly going to go to Gary Oldman for his richly enjoyable and seamlessly latexed impersonation of Winston Churchill in Darkest Hour — although there is an argument that Stephen Dillane deserved a best supporting actor nod for his studied portrayal of the insidious appeaser, Lord Halifax, in the same film.

Mike Petrilli has made the same argument about America in pieces like «Memo to the World: America's Secret Sauce Isn't Made in Our Classrooms.»

There are people who like print books, and I have no argument with them either, because they, too, have a right to live their lives as they see fit, although I would take exception if they choose to «evangelise» their views, much in the same way as those who choose to sit in their imaginary camps of anti-Troglodytes.

The argument here is that certain traditionally published and popular authors don't have to play by the same rules like self - published authors.

I'll concede that the same argument could be made for the iPhone, but the tablet isn't a proven device like a smartphone.

neat trick trying to turn the argument back on me you wrongly assume that i am pro sony yes i like some of what sony do but i also like what nintendo does and same goes for MS and i have owned all of those console unlike you also my judgement of you was based on the fact that you stated your opinion was based on the score alone.

Like I said before, I've gone over this same conversation multiple times, and I've read others talking about it, and when you go in depth with it, the pure haters are almost always the ones who run out of arguments.