Sentences with phrase «same as behavior»
While enrichment is not the same as behavior modification, it can do wonders to prevent behavior issues from developing and / or escalating due to boredom, stress, and frustration.
https://www.dogpossibleaustin.com/ Not exact matches
Defining levels of bad behavior is important, because we shouldn't lump sexual assault in the same bucket as a sexist remark, she writes:
If the data from one of the many employee management tool tells you that people who have exhibited the same behaviors as Jane is exhibiting right now quit in 75 percent of the time, that also means that 25 percent of those people don't quit.
The result is that Facebook can't use the rollout of access as a way to entrench its dominance in social networking and mobile messaging, its operator partners can't use free Facebook to gain an advantage over their rivals, and the same kind of behavior is off - limits to everyone else too.
But if a man displayed the same behavior, the training asks, would it be seen as a flaw?
Kogan described it as a «big leap» to connect the piece of research to Kremlin efforts to use online platforms to interfere in foreign elections — before essentially going on to repeat a Kremlin talking point by saying the US and the UK engage in much the same types of behavior.
Bill Hester notes that going back as far as Depression era data, that same behavior coupled with a rich Shiller P / E (anything above the mid-teens) and a preponderance of daily declines in recent data (say down 11 days out of 14) has preceded even worse outcomes - particularly in the context of a weak economic backdrop.
@ CMD... I know plenty of Liberals who display the same behavior as many right - wingers.
During the final month his previously brilliant brain was rava.ged by cancer and he had the same behavior as # 1.
There are some issues that get all the attention because different societies view some behavior as wrong while other are ok with it (e.g. role of women in the society, same se.x relationships, etc.).
Of the three pastors I've seen talk about this, all of them exhibited many of the same narcissistic behaviors and referred to people that leave as excrement.
FF, I agree that the extinction theory is pretty far out, but as I'm looking at the situation from a purely biological stand point, if we were to translate this same behavior to most other animal groups, same sex proliferation could be a threat to their survival.
Why, then, does Gagnon single out homosexual behavior for censure, while refusing to treat divorce with the same condemnation as homosexual behavior?
For those not directly affected, it is timely and necessary for Mark's peers, particularly for those with the same level of influence as Mark, to publicly express a stand regarding behavior that is unacceptable in ministry.
The behavior was the same as using a «rude» word.
If the church is the representative of Jesus to the world, then to the degree that the church seeks to meet our own needs before the needs of others, desires to control the beliefs and behaviors of others (both inside and outside the church), and chases after glory, fame, power, wealth, and recognition before men, is the same degree to which the church presents Jesus as a Satanic Messiah to the watching world.
The essence of Christian behavior is to treat people as people, all equally loved by the same Father, however much they may differ in talents or development.
too true; you're right, we are holistic people in a holistic world living holistic lives and political theory, religion, ethics, behavior, psychology, these and many others are all so inextricably intertwined with each other that it may be better to think of them as different views of the same object rather than distinct objects that are inter-related (using «object» here, of course, metaphorically)
The most negative statement by Paul regarding same - sex acts occurs in Romans 1:24 - 27 where, in the context of a larger argument on the need of all people for the gospel of Jesus Christ, certain homosexual behavior is given as an example of the «uncleanness» of idolatrous Gentiles.
Any critical reader notices that this is the exact same behavior as someone who believes in magic chanting a spell.
But over the years, as I have personally engaged in hypocritical and sinful behavior, and as I have watched other Christians do the same, I have found that there are several excuses we give for our poor treatment of other people, and for sin in our own lives.
-- especially when, as most of you would know, the law prohibiting homosexual behavior is imbedded in a context in Leviticus in the holiness code, the purity code, as it's sometimes called, which also prohibits the planting of two kinds of seed in the same field, or the wearing of garments made of two kinds of cloth.
He's on the same plane, whether he realizes it or not, as those who say AIDS is God punishing behavior.
I watch here in Salt Lake as Evangelicals «mock» Mormons, over the same behaviors that they themselves participate in... can't they see there is no difference?
I have left churches some time ago as I find the same behavior there.
Incidentally, «being» gay or «being» straight is not the same thing as behavior.
Trying to keep gay people from having the same rights as you just becuase they are gay and you are not is in no way moral behavior.
Behavior modification isn't the same thing as becoming.
Furthermore, the deconstuction and revision of the Bible to «accept» sinful acts and behaviors as part of the «Jesus loves everyone no matter what» school of thought is par for the course with the practioners of same here in this forum.
Persons of the same sex can not marry because they can not do what married couples can, i.e., consummate their union by a bodily act in which they become the common subjects of an act that, precisely as human behavior, is eminently fit both for the communication of spousal love and for the generation of new human life.
That's because same - sex behavior in the first century was not understood to be the expression of an exclusive sexual orientation but rather it was understood as excess on the part of those who could easily be content with heterosexual relationships, but who went beyond them in search of more exotic pleasures.
If the point of religion is to bring peace and guide a culture toward certain specific behaviors, primarily for order and the preservation of the good qualities of society, then how can one say that one religion is better than another or that a «religion-less» person who STILL acts the SAME way (i.e. does right unto their neighbors, lives according to the thing the bible suggests) but is more tolerant is not as high quality a citizen as another who is associated with a Major League Religious Team?
I thought it was the Calvinism I was so heavily involved in until I notice the same behaviors among other men I admire just as much; Chay, Bing, Fruchtenbaum, Ryrie, Crouch and others, we were all doing it regardless of what you believed.
The Day of Truth, held on the same day as the Day of Silence, «was established to counter the promotion of homosexual behavior and to express an opposing viewpoint from a Christian perspective,» according to a manual for this year's event published by Exodus International.
«We embrace you but not same - sex behavior» — so lightly spoken, as though one could fully embrace heterosexuals as long as they never have sex, lol.
It is commonly accepted that a person will continue to experience desire and even occasionally lapse into same - sex behavior as part of the overall conversion process.
When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible societal behaviors as being legitimate, you will understand why I dismiss your pet one (same sex marriage).»
In response to this overall assessment of the FWT's methodological motives and behavior, I first want to address Griffin's contention that FWTs display the tendency to utilize a double standard when discussing evil — that they don't allow their «Own positions to be judged with the same rigor, and in terms of the same criteria, as the other positions.»
but maryland, we are not better than they are, we just have been exposed to different cultural ideas and books and behaviors, we are not better or worse and as it happens, we are more the same than we are different even to tone of voice in different languages.
I think that his actions as President speak more loudly of his «faith» than anything — his excuses for Islamic leadership's failures to condemn extremist behavior while at the same time calling to task marginal Christian leaders for mere words.
Protecting the alcoholic's ego so that he will not become defensive is not the same as protecting him from the consequences of his immature behavior.
Just the same as we have the history of the Greeks and Romans, and a chapter on the religious behaviors and beliefs of those people.
Even the best believer is still just as human as you, they have the same nature and when they are led by the old nature they are as capable of the same behavior as any human.
The God of Israel and Muhammad have the same traits as an abusive partner: • you have to fear him to receive his love • you are unworthy of his love • you are nothing without him • if you do not love him he will hurt you • he doesn't want to punish you — it's really your fault • he threatens you if he thinks you might break things off • at all times he needs to know where you are, what you're doing and thinking so he can control your thoughts and behavior • doesn't want you to get an education because you'll realize you don't need him anymore and break up • worst of all, you have to bring him beer and a sammich
It seems to me less arbitrary and more logical to go along with Jennings (quoted by Agar 1943, p. 153), who wrote after years of study on the behavior of amoebae: «I am thoroughly convinced, after long study of the behavior of this organism, that if Amoeba were a large animal, so as to come within the every day experience of human beings, its behavior would at once call forth the attribution to it of states of pleasure and pain, of hunger, desire, and the like, on precisely the same basis as we attribute these things to the dog.»
According to Philo, the great crime of male same - sex behavior — pederasty, specifically — was that males would «suffer the affliction of being treated like a women» which Philo referred to as «the greatest of evils, unmanliness and effeminacy.»
Even among those who count homosexual behavior as a sin, there is usually at least some room in the fellowship for people attracted to the same sex.
Often cited in the discussion regarding same - sex relationships are Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, which describe same - sex behavior between males as an «abomination» punishable by death.
But Philo was operating from ancient assumptions regarding same - sex behavior, Matthew argues, and therefore condemning the actions of the men of Sodom as the excessive pleasure - seeking of men who could also be satisfied with women.
As has already been shown, same - sex relations in the first century were not thought to be the expression of an exclusive sexual orientation but were widely understood to be the product of excessive sexual desire wherein the one engaging in same - sex behavior did so out of an excess of lust that could not be satisfied.