Sentences with phrase «same as the single player»

Multiplayer is the same as single player and unremarkable.

You are able to be the same character as your comrades, so multiplayer is generally the same as single player with the exception of being able to help each other overcome trials as opposed to doing it solo.

There is also co-op, that, unlike Resistance 2, isn't a separate component of the game, but is exactly the same as the single player portion, and always welcome is the presence of split - screen (just because online exists, Mr developer, doesn't mean we no longer want to play locally) though the online co-op is strangely only able to be played with people on your friends list, which is likely to come as a disappointment to some.

There is a multiplayer option, but it plays very much the same as single player.

The goal is the same as the single player mode here, letting you join a team of four in an attempt to master the terrain together.

You can hook up extra controllers and have a group test their skills against each other, but the game is exactly the same as single player.

The game is the same as single player, but you can blast away alien robots with a friend and compete to see who gets the higher score.

Add that up with the fact that the levels were the same as single player and didn't the game wasn't nearly as tough to get through.

There are time trials that feel the same as the single player content.

Not exact matches

Where I have the problem is other teams do have exciting young talent and those teams don't get the same credit that your team's talent with question marks has been getting this year but also well before this year It's because the Sixers are thought to have the best young talent, Simmons / Embiid are viewed as the best young duo in the nba (http://www.nba.com/article/2017/11/01/blogtable-dynamic-young-duos-jokic-murray-simmons-embiid-towns-wiggins-brown), it's hard to get a single generational player, many believe the Sixers have TWO.

But I maintain if he is not in the same stature as Suarez, Ibra or Aguero who can single handedly drag us over the line like RVP did, we are just gambling around and maybe an expensive gamble too, we have players of our own we can gamble on, if in doubt, put Walcott and Lacazette on the market and let's who get's snapped up first.

Goalies don't have the same kind of physical demands as the field players do every single game, so their careers can be longer than a field player.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Now I think there is still reasons to be cheerful, I agree Man C & Chelski have spent & bought some good players, we all understand that 5 of those teams might be in the CL proper which is a huge distraction for those 4 - 5 teams.Chelsea will not be able to field the same 13 - 14 players all season, as for Man C they were very frail at the back last season, add to that 2 flying wing backs and I'm not sure they will be any better this coming season.LFC will most probably have CL as well if they qualify and haven't exactly bought great players apart from Salah who could be a good aquasistion for them.Spuds have sold a good player & strengthened a rival & still not bought a single player yet, Man U have bought 2 good players & in Lukaku have a proven goal scorer in the PL but if they play the same dour way they did last season & with the added games the CL brings will they perform week in week out in the league??? As for Everton yes they have released a lot of players and also brought in a lot too to give better quality in the squad as they have Europa league the same as US the big difference is I think we will play squad players & youngsters maybe with a few senior players all the way up to the QF This tells me most of our rivals will pave the way for us to field pretty much the same side every weekend in the PL thus giving us an advantage over all the other 5 teams playing in the CL & Europa, just remember the League has been won in the last 2 seasons by teams NOT in Europe YES we are this season but I think Wenger will put all his eggs in the League basket and field an under strength side in all comps hence focusing on the League until we are no longer in the racas for Man C they were very frail at the back last season, add to that 2 flying wing backs and I'm not sure they will be any better this coming season.LFC will most probably have CL as well if they qualify and haven't exactly bought great players apart from Salah who could be a good aquasistion for them.Spuds have sold a good player & strengthened a rival & still not bought a single player yet, Man U have bought 2 good players & in Lukaku have a proven goal scorer in the PL but if they play the same dour way they did last season & with the added games the CL brings will they perform week in week out in the league??? As for Everton yes they have released a lot of players and also brought in a lot too to give better quality in the squad as they have Europa league the same as US the big difference is I think we will play squad players & youngsters maybe with a few senior players all the way up to the QF This tells me most of our rivals will pave the way for us to field pretty much the same side every weekend in the PL thus giving us an advantage over all the other 5 teams playing in the CL & Europa, just remember the League has been won in the last 2 seasons by teams NOT in Europe YES we are this season but I think Wenger will put all his eggs in the League basket and field an under strength side in all comps hence focusing on the League until we are no longer in the racas well if they qualify and haven't exactly bought great players apart from Salah who could be a good aquasistion for them.Spuds have sold a good player & strengthened a rival & still not bought a single player yet, Man U have bought 2 good players & in Lukaku have a proven goal scorer in the PL but if they play the same dour way they did last season & with the added games the CL brings will they perform week in week out in the league??? As for Everton yes they have released a lot of players and also brought in a lot too to give better quality in the squad as they have Europa league the same as US the big difference is I think we will play squad players & youngsters maybe with a few senior players all the way up to the QF This tells me most of our rivals will pave the way for us to field pretty much the same side every weekend in the PL thus giving us an advantage over all the other 5 teams playing in the CL & Europa, just remember the League has been won in the last 2 seasons by teams NOT in Europe YES we are this season but I think Wenger will put all his eggs in the League basket and field an under strength side in all comps hence focusing on the League until we are no longer in the racAs for Everton yes they have released a lot of players and also brought in a lot too to give better quality in the squad as they have Europa league the same as US the big difference is I think we will play squad players & youngsters maybe with a few senior players all the way up to the QF This tells me most of our rivals will pave the way for us to field pretty much the same side every weekend in the PL thus giving us an advantage over all the other 5 teams playing in the CL & Europa, just remember the League has been won in the last 2 seasons by teams NOT in Europe YES we are this season but I think Wenger will put all his eggs in the League basket and field an under strength side in all comps hence focusing on the League until we are no longer in the racas they have Europa league the same as US the big difference is I think we will play squad players & youngsters maybe with a few senior players all the way up to the QF This tells me most of our rivals will pave the way for us to field pretty much the same side every weekend in the PL thus giving us an advantage over all the other 5 teams playing in the CL & Europa, just remember the League has been won in the last 2 seasons by teams NOT in Europe YES we are this season but I think Wenger will put all his eggs in the League basket and field an under strength side in all comps hence focusing on the League until we are no longer in the racas US the big difference is I think we will play squad players & youngsters maybe with a few senior players all the way up to the QF This tells me most of our rivals will pave the way for us to field pretty much the same side every weekend in the PL thus giving us an advantage over all the other 5 teams playing in the CL & Europa, just remember the League has been won in the last 2 seasons by teams NOT in Europe YES we are this season but I think Wenger will put all his eggs in the League basket and field an under strength side in all comps hence focusing on the League until we are no longer in the race.

After all, Newcastle didn't but a single player under former manager Chris Hughton, with the current squad the same as the one which went down nearly two years ago.

The problem with Quake 4 is that, for the most part, the single player mode suffers from the same simplicity as «Doom 3» - random shooting through a maze of «appeasing - at - first, but - boring - after - the - 100th - time» environments.

The single player campaign mode follows the source material very well so far, and going through the story is as fun as watching the anime, maybe even better from time to time since you get to control a soldier and slay some titans:D As for the sounds, the voices are the same as in the anime, the only thing that is missing in my opinion is the music from the animas fun as watching the anime, maybe even better from time to time since you get to control a soldier and slay some titans:D As for the sounds, the voices are the same as in the anime, the only thing that is missing in my opinion is the music from the animas watching the anime, maybe even better from time to time since you get to control a soldier and slay some titans:D As for the sounds, the voices are the same as in the anime, the only thing that is missing in my opinion is the music from the animAs for the sounds, the voices are the same as in the anime, the only thing that is missing in my opinion is the music from the animas in the anime, the only thing that is missing in my opinion is the music from the anime.

That's usually the case with the Mario Party series, the developers have yet to bring up the content of Single Player to the same level of fun and excitement as what Multiplayer brings.

Personally, I still loved the multiplayer though, as it offered just enough of the same explosively violent entertainment that the single player offered.

With up to three people online, you'll re-visit the same places as the single player campaign and complete standard Dead Rising mission objectives.

Single Train is the easiest mode, as it only allows one train, but the difficulty can be quickly ramped all the way up with Extreme mode, which has players juggle four ghosts trains at the same time.

Along the same lines, the single player campaign is very short as it takes only a couple of hours to complete the handful of tournaments.

Oki: We have the same dynamic weather system as the MGSV: TPP single player campaign.

Players can battle their way through single - player arcade mode to shoot for a high score or they can grab a friend for local multiplayer, either by sharing the same keyboard hotseat style or by plugging in a second USB keyboard, which is recognized by the game as a distinct controller.

Essentially you get the single player campaign, but with the added bonus of a buddy who appears to look the same as you, but in a different color palate.

Nova takes place in the same world as Phantasy Star Online 2 (which has been delayed indefinitely outside of Japan), but emphasizes the single - player story over huge multiplayer hubs and missions.

But, as you battle through the single player mode, repetition soon sets in as you face the same opponents over and over.

So Rockstar's track record of legendary single player content has never been broken, and everyone will expecting something of the same calibre for Red Dead Redemption 2, as a minimum.

Single player is fine but quick and you won't get the same kind of fun as the multiplayer will give you.

There are only six arena stages, and they suffer from the same design problems as the single - player stages.

They are fun for a short time, but they don't have anywhere near the same intensity as the single player campaign.

The same loadouts in the single player campaign are available in survival mode as well as the other characters you've unlocked.

Although I enjoyed playing online a great deal and appreciated the rewards that assist you in the single player campaign, I can't help but wish there was more to it as taking part in the same kinds of missions over and over again gets repetitive very quickly.

The most important feature and idea is the single plank design which lacks a connection point between the neck and the body to allow players to play on the last frets exactly the same as on all others without any obstacle.

The first Android app you open takes quite a while to load; subsequent apps in the same session are far faster as the Dalvik player is already running and all the Android apps you run appear in a single window with a list of icons for running apps at the bottom.

It does not necessarily need to be multiplayer games either, as two people can enjoy the same single player game.

I can't understand why people are so down on this game, it's superb, the single player is much the same as the first but there was nothing really wrong with it anyway, mp is where this game belongs though, granted it has some problems, it can be a pain at times trying to connect to a game but get together with a friend in Terrorist hunt and it's a blast.

What I did play lacked the same charm as the single - player campaign, but still used the same great gameplay mechanics and used similar backdrops.

Port Ops is already on the store, it just needs the same thing as this (but that's pointless since the online mode is dead and buried and the single - player really isn't worth playing)

Ratchet and Clank HD Trilogy (Going for all three platinums) Crysis 2 (Want to start the single player; never played it) Bioshock 2 (Same deal as «Crysis 2») Eternal Darkness Soul Sacrifice

Unfortunately, the same can be said for the single player, as Ninja Gaiden 3 is linear beyond belief.

Now onto the Single player mode or the «single player upgrade» if you've purchased the multiplayer edition, this is basically the same as a private match in multiplayer, you play one of the multiplayer selections against AI on top of that you have survival mode which was rather confusing, my idea of the game was a normal FPS game with zombies implemented so you can't camp, when you're playing the survival mode the full area has some sort of gas which will kill you if you don't get out of it, you get sent to different air pockets which open up in a set area per round, this meaning you have to camp in the air bubble and take on the hordes of zombies approaching, I've played a few zombie fps games in my days and always wanted to move around, create a train and take them out, on top of that ammo drops or weapon drops are in said bubbles and lack in quality, I wasn't impressed with the survival mode implementation and wouldn't advise any horde fans to even look Single player mode or the «single player upgrade» if you've purchased the multiplayer edition, this is basically the same as a private match in multiplayer, you play one of the multiplayer selections against AI on top of that you have survival mode which was rather confusing, my idea of the game was a normal FPS game with zombies implemented so you can't camp, when you're playing the survival mode the full area has some sort of gas which will kill you if you don't get out of it, you get sent to different air pockets which open up in a set area per round, this meaning you have to camp in the air bubble and take on the hordes of zombies approaching, I've played a few zombie fps games in my days and always wanted to move around, create a train and take them out, on top of that ammo drops or weapon drops are in said bubbles and lack in quality, I wasn't impressed with the survival mode implementation and wouldn't advise any horde fans to even look single player upgrade» if you've purchased the multiplayer edition, this is basically the same as a private match in multiplayer, you play one of the multiplayer selections against AI on top of that you have survival mode which was rather confusing, my idea of the game was a normal FPS game with zombies implemented so you can't camp, when you're playing the survival mode the full area has some sort of gas which will kill you if you don't get out of it, you get sent to different air pockets which open up in a set area per round, this meaning you have to camp in the air bubble and take on the hordes of zombies approaching, I've played a few zombie fps games in my days and always wanted to move around, create a train and take them out, on top of that ammo drops or weapon drops are in said bubbles and lack in quality, I wasn't impressed with the survival mode implementation and wouldn't advise any horde fans to even look at it.

Controls are the same as they are in single player mode, but it's more difficult to draw commands with the Wii Remotes than it is to use the Game Pad's touch screen.

This mix of real time strategy, air and ground vehicle - based action, on - foot shootering, single - player campaign, and online multiplayer could be in the same league as Playstation exclusives like Mag and Killzone 3.

The single player experience is for the most part, the same as you remember but be warned just go in with more tempered expectations, at least graphically.

While Nine Parchments may not offer the same kind of fun as a single - player experience, those who tackle the game cooperatively are in for a fun time.

First off, Ghostly Horizon is a multiplayer game with authoritative server, therefore all the code from day 1 is written as multiplayer code, and this is a lot different and more difficult than programming a single - player game with the same features.

Gravel's online multiplayer performance is just as good as single player with the same sense of speed, graphics, up to 8 players and the capability of A.I. fleshing out the field.

G: During the development of Final Fantasy XV we have seen something quite new for Final Fantasy games, at least concerning single player ones, as your colleague Naoki Yoshida has been doing the same for Final Fantasy XIV.

As ever, it's better played with friends, and the difficulty curve can be brutal, but Zombies has the same breadth and attention to detail as Black Ops III's campaign — like the central single - player mode it constantly surprises yoAs ever, it's better played with friends, and the difficulty curve can be brutal, but Zombies has the same breadth and attention to detail as Black Ops III's campaign — like the central single - player mode it constantly surprises yoas Black Ops III's campaign — like the central single - player mode it constantly surprises you.