Sentences with phrase «same assertions»

[F] ellow conservation biologists attending a Lomborg talk would correct his science, only to find the same assertions made in subsequent talks as if the corrections had never occurred.
Are you making the same assertions every time Mann gets another paper published which makes the same simple, and now egregious, errors?
The same assertions you make opposing those of us who oppose same sex «marriage» (sic)-- that we have «religious objections»; that we're «bigots», etc. are equally applicable against to our opposition to polygamy, for example.
Fundamentalist Mormons and Muslims could make the same assertions the Gay community has made to advance polygamy.
Coinbase's GDAX additionally made the same assertion, with the product supervisor on the firm, Alex Sieke, publishing a
Coinbase's GDAX additionally made the same assertion, with the product supervisor on the firm, Alex Sieke, publishing a blog post of his personal.
You made the claim they did it in the name of atheism, then shot yourself in the foot with your own cut and pasts, and have ignored that ever since and continued to make the same assertion.
there was the one that spent 3 pages telling a blogger that he would burn in hell for something that was the exact opposite of what he said, to which was appended, almost verbatim, the same assertion about Jesus, and a happy «God bless you,» Seems, the more unhinged, the more likely the person will end their rant with, «Have a nice day.»
So that now, even when the same assertion is made today as was made a thousand, or fifteen hundred years ago, it is made subject to limitations or expansions of meaning, which were not contemplated at the earlier epoch.
Not for the x-th repetition of the same assertion that comes without proper scientific evidence.
In other words, the paper assumes the spatial validity of the models, so it can not simultaneously be cited as evidence in support of the same assertion, otherwise you are begging the question.
Of course, you may find that both policies are making the same assertion — they're both indicating that they should come in as the primary insurance on the claim, or, likewise, the second.
Interestingly enough, her sister made the same assertion this year.
The commenter made the same assertion in the comment letter it submitted in response to the TILA - RESPA Proposal.

Not exact matches

The Globe and Mail recently speculated that the mandate will remain largely the same, but that it may be amended «to include a forceful assertion of what he [Carney] calls «flexible inflation targeting,»» or his right to respond to economic shocks or dangerous buildups of credit by taking longer than usual to bring inflation to the central bank's 2 % target.»
hotairACE sayz,»... we will put your assertions in the same bin as yet to be substantiated reports...» There's that «wegod» again.
Everyone who believes that Jesus and God are one in the same most often refer to the Gospel of John because you won't find that assertion in the three other gospels of Mark, Matthew, and Luke.
What you describe with private intimidation tactics to combat public assertions is the same as what happened the last time this came out publicly around 2010 or so.
While it is of course true that those who belong to this school are perhaps most vocal in their assertion that in our Lord alone may God be seen at work, and while it is they who denounce the concept of «general» revelation as a vain fancy of sub-Christian speculation, a considerable number of other Christian thinkers take what in effect is the same position when they make central to their teaching a kind of uniqueness in the coming and the person of Christ which effectively removes him from the context of the total sell - expressive operation of the Eternal Word.
As a matter of theology, the word asserts that «whatever is divine» in Jesus, his deity, is as truly and fully divine as very God himself; but as a matter of religious conviction and experience, it is the assertion that very God, in all his mystery and in all his glory, is of «one substance with,» is the same reality as, that which in Jesus Christ we have been given to see and know and touch and feel.
In the same paper, commenting on the final pages of Process and Reality, Cobb wrote «some of us think, following Whitehead here, that John's assertion that «God is love» is a profound metaphysical truth.»
But it is clear that the shouldering of the accident of his destiny in the facing of death is really the same radical self - assertion on man's part.
The same is true of the assertion that the liturgy is the source and goal of Christianity.
Those merely echoing the same claims are the ones who have yet to come up with anything proving the supernatural assertions from it.
Assertions that heterosexual couples are inherently better parents than same sex couples, or that the children of lesbian or gay parents fare worse than children of heterosexual parents, have no support in the scientific research literature.
Your assertion implies that you have first hand knowledge that this did not occur while at the same time I suspect you agree with the Big Bang Theory.
Everything else you said can be lumped into the same category that you placed my assertions into: «unproved (or unprovable) axioms.»
He can not distinguish questions regarding the existence of the universe from questions regarding its physical origin; he does not grasp how assertions regarding the absolute must logically differ from assertions regarding contingent beings; he does not know the differences between truths of reason and empirical facts; he has no concept of ontology, in contradistinction to, say, physics or evolutionary biology; he does not understand how assertions regarding transcendental perfections differ from assertions regarding maximum magnitude; he clumsily imagines that the idea of God is susceptible to the same argument from infinite regress traditionally advanced against materialism; he does not understand what the metaphysical concept of simplicity entails; and on and on.
The Hawaiian court has thus set itself on the same course of action as the misguided Supreme Court in 1973 when it thought that laws about abortion were merely an assertion of the rights of a living mother and an unborn fetus.
Nor does the assertion mean all Americans believe equally in the ideology or mean by it the same thing in all respects.
In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife» (1 Corinthians 7:3 - 4) This flat - out contradicts Wilson's assertion that authority belongs only to the man.
However, where Paul definitely was the driving force behind the establishment of early Christian congregations and never waivered in his assertion that Jesus is the Messiah, at the same time he prided himself in waiting 3 years after his conversion to even learn what Jesus taught!
Easy Bob - Not believing in unsupportable assertions is not the same thing as ripping those who do.
Consequently, if metaphysics can be established at all, it is only as a transcendental metaphysics, whose concepts and assertions are all purely formal and literal, rather than analogical, in the sense that they apply to all the different things within any single logical type whose meaning they explicate, not in different senses, but rather in the same sense.
Though the objects of study for each of the two disciplines are different, nonetheless both should be answerable to the same philosophical scheme, and appropriately enough we find in the very opening chapter to Process and Reality just such an assertion on Whitehead's part — note the justification which Whitehead offers for his cosmology.
In this sense, the foundational assertions of Christian witness and theology, as distinct from their constitutive assertion, are all assertions about God; and this means that, in the very same sense, the concept expressed by «God» must be as indispensable to Christian theology as to the witness of faith en which it is the reflection.
The most primitive interpretation of Jesus is undoubtedly represented by the assertion ascribed to Peter in Acts 2:36: «God hath made this same Jesus whom ye crucified both Lord and Christ.»
Making an assertion is not the same as making an argument.
In the organic responses of the adverbial level, selective processes operate according to what is relevant to the fulfilment of the organism as a whole.12 At the same time, although some selectivity may occur, adverbial responses tend to take the character of «total assertions» of the whole organism about the whole object it confronts.13 At the accusative level, or level of conscious symbolization, whole masses of irrelevant detail are excluded according to some principle of relevance operating in consciousness at the time.
At the same time, a balancing of probable and partial assertions characteristic of accusative activity does have a place at later stages when articulation of the faith becomes the task at hand.
If W. H. Auden is correct in his assertion that the day's events in the life of an average person could fill a novel, an account of the activity of a congregation in the same period might occupy several shelves.
I never said it is my own work, and whether is mine or someone else's, it is all the same because even the whole Creation testifies of the truth of its message, and your assertion is drowned out by the witness of it.
Assertions that heterose xual couples are inherently better parents than same se x couples, or that the children of lesbian or gay parents fare worse than children of heterose xual parents, have no support in the scientific research literature.
Traditional mysticism freely recognizes the limitations of all worldly knowledge, yet does not with the same honesty admit the tentativeness of its own intuitive assertions.
And you only say that kind of thing once someone actually points out your unjustified assertions of it being true, while in the same breath claiming that you only offer opinion?
Even with the assertion that control equals ident.ity, or to control something completely it must be a part of you and you it and therefore the controllers ident.ity includes that which is controlled, that still does not mean that God would need / want / be able to control and identify with everything at the same time or at any time since some supposed creation event.
NOMINUS: Even with the assertion that control equals ident.ity, or to control something completely it must be a part of you and you it and therefore the controllers ident.ity includes that which is controlled, that still does not mean that God would need / want / be able to control and identify with everything at the same time or at any time since some supposed creation event.
Over the past month, Hawkins has posted on her Facebook and Twitter statements including «I stand in human solidarity with my Muslim neighbor,» «I stand in religious solidarity with Muslims because they, like me, a Christian, are people of the book,» and an assertion that Christians and Muslims «worship the same God.»
«38 But that is by no means the same as Radhakrishnan's assertion: «Hinduism believes that every guru is a Saviour, in as much as he quickens in his disciples the life of God and develops the seed of the spirit capable of fructifying in them.
It is, I suppose, a defense in the same ad hominem sense in which his assertion of the centrality of happiness as an object of desire is a defense against the critic who denies the desirability of happiness.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z