Sentences with phrase «same author cites»

The same author cites, as part of the faith, love for anyone who may be loved by God and thus by Gabriel and all those in paradise.

Not exact matches

[15] The authors cited that this may be due to same - s.

A third matter of note is that Luke freely includes references to the kingdom in citing the sayings of Jesus, though less often than Matthew, but in the book of Acts by the same author the references to the kingdom are few.

I didn't see any evidence (1) actually connecting the former to the latter, (2) that the differences at birth are lasting, (3) that the purported diseases associated with the microbiome in adulthood are the same ones associated with c - section (the author cites obesity, but we know that those observational studies re: c - section and obesity are deeply flawed by confounding)(4) that the «microbiotic» benefit of vaginal birth exists regardless of maternal health and matenral microbiome.

«It appears that copying text from other papers is more common in some nations than others, but the outcome is generally the same for authors who copy extensively: Their papers don't get cited much.»

During the same period there were 36 000 publications related to AIDS, 15 per cent of which were never subsequently cited, even by their own authors.

Entries in GenBank databases can be cited in the same way you would cite any publication, giving the authors, date and accession number.

The company is citing «security concerns ``, much in the same way that Harper Collins cited the «need to protect their authors» when they imposed the 26 - circulation cap on library ebook lending back in February 2011.

As for citing Smashwords and Author Solutions in the same breath... This really shows how totally out of touch you are with what's happening in the self - publishing world.

The author makes the same point again and again, citing different anecdotes from chapter to chapter.

Then, they immediately go into the all of the money they're going to make and cite the same two authors who made it rich in self - publishing.

[3] Farnworth et al., [4] whose work the authors cite, suggest that even cat owners, who, on average, «found nonlethal methods significantly more acceptable for stray cats than non-owners did,» felt differently when the same cats were described as «feral» (as distinct from «stray» or «companion»).

This article cites a previous piece of work published by the same author in the BARKS from the Guild Magazine.

Click the «cited by» and «Related articles» links (focus on articles cited by more other articles) And look for other papers by the same authors, many of whom likely have copies available online that you can read.

Ferdinand, I started having a look at the relevant papers, and noticed a couple of things: Soden was a co-author of the 2002 Wielicki paper you cite, in 2002 Soden was lead author of yet another paper in Science, this one focused on the effects of the Pinatubo eruption, Wielicki and Wong (also an author of the 2002 Wielicki paper) were in turn co-authors of a 2003 IEEE paper debunking the iris effect, and... how in the world can so many scientists, many of them frequent collaborators, screw up something this fundamental over such a long period of time and have most of it get through peer review in the same prestigious publication?

However, the 40 percent figure comes from several other papers by the same author that the WWF failed to cite.

This report, which helped foster the type of interdisciplinary communication the authors recommend, cites many of the same villains we've come to learn about over the last few years, including nanotechnology, geo - engineering and genetic engineering.

Sure the outcome can be the same with damages awarded to the injured party but I would be interested to know if the author is able to cite a case where marketing or advertising incompetence by a Realtor has resulted in successful litigation and an award of damages.