Sentences with phrase «same author costs»

Not exact matches

The team of authors emphasized that the low cost of conducting their project means that the same approach can be rapidly implemented in any country, thereby supporting both national and international commitments to reduce and offset carbon emissions.

In the same vein, the authors note that while the light - emitting diode is in fact the most energy - efficient, longest - lasting, and greenest source of artificial lighting, studies show that as the cost of lighting has decreased, total consumption has increased dramatically.

Arkansas's original study, conducted the same year, cost about the same initially but rose to over twice that amount ($ 800,000) when the authors accepted a commission to ascertain whether districts used their extra money in a way consistent with the consultants» evidence - based policies.

At the same time we understand that the costs are just astronomical for some of these things so that's really what we pride ourselves upon is keeping costs as low as we could possibly make them so that it's accessible to all authors at whatever level.»

If I remember correctly, the last time I ordered author copies for a book with approximately the same page count as the special edition of Vengeance, it cost $ 4.99 (give or take a few cents).

You are right that production and distribution costs per unit are less for ebooks than for paperbacks, but authors have the same 2 % to 12.5 % earnings of the list price of the book.

Many of the editors on the list are surprisingly cost effective, don't settle for a run of the mill editor, with our top secret list you can use the same editors as bestselling authors.

Publishing industry events have been debating the ins and outs of reaching readers directly for several years, and companies have been exhibiting at these events for that same amount of time, promising both publishers and authors they could reach out to book audiences and seamlessly sell content, wiping out the need to pay fees or argue over how much a book should cost.

I know they take the same amount of time and effort to write (or at least they should), but producing one copy costs the same for the publisher / author as producing 200.

The same book in Norway or Malta may cost $ 6.99 and the author will still get the same 35 % of the $ 2.99.

Essentially, BookBaby, has found that charging legitimate authors an upfront fee to process and distribute their ebooks may cause some to ultimately opt for one of the sites that makes its profit out of royalties rather than pay an initial investment; however, this same business model means that spam and piracy can be kept to a minimum as get - rich - quick scammers are loathe to shell out the upfront cost.

The two somewhat similar companies, PubSlush and LeanPub, began offering a platform solely based on the idea that authors could reach out to potential readers while the book is still in the process of being written and accept funding to help cover the costs associated with publishing the book; around this same time, Wattpad rolled out a limited pilot program that worked with six authors to fund their titles through reader donations.

I think if there are those who believe that a quality book should cost less than a 10 minute experience for a cup of coffee, then they should enjoy the lower price tier of books, and spend a fair amount of time with authors whose product might not have had the same attention or resources brought to bear.

While both platforms help self - published authors make their books available to a larger public at little or no cost to themselves, their focus is about developing two distinctly different versions of the same book.

Even though the authors and the publishers will still make their same commission and even though the supremely discounted price on ebooks has translated into tens of thousands of book sales for authors and fiction's digital sales are up by 188 % for the first half of the year, authors are speaking out against having their ebooks discounted at the retailers» cost.

In the case when two authors had won the same prize - in different years - the book written by the female cost less than that written by the male.

Mark went on to mention «If an author can earn the same or greater income selling lower cost books, yet reach significantly more readers, then, drum roll please, it means the authors who are selling higher priced books through traditional publishers are at an extreme disadvantage to indie authors in terms of long term platform building.

But unlike self - publishing services, PLL's The Studio works with authors in the same type of royalty structure that a publisher would, absorbing the cost of services to later be compensated by royalties from the sale of the books.

For her part, Authors Alliance co-founder Pamela Samuelson gave an interview to Publisher's Weekly that very clearly illustrates how the organization isn't even on the same radar as the Authors Guild, instead planning to advocate for authors who are interested in making their works available on a widespread, no costAuthors Alliance co-founder Pamela Samuelson gave an interview to Publisher's Weekly that very clearly illustrates how the organization isn't even on the same radar as the Authors Guild, instead planning to advocate for authors who are interested in making their works available on a widespread, no costAuthors Guild, instead planning to advocate for authors who are interested in making their works available on a widespread, no costauthors who are interested in making their works available on a widespread, no cost basis.

In this case if an author set their selling price as the same price it cost them to print the book they would not make a dime on the sale.

In every case, the objective is the same: to persuade someone other than the author to invest or share in the costs of producing the book.

In my proposal, the author receives the usual royalty rate, 35 % or 70 %, the same as for sales (though the delivery cost has to be factored in somehow for the 70 % plan, maybe divide the delivery charge for the book by the number of pages and subtract this from the per page royalty).

This brings down the production cost and authors can either set a lower price for their books or earn a higher royalty at the same price.

Access to the various channels costs different amounts in different places, and again for whatever reason you act as though these channels are available for free (or at any rate that cost is irrelevant) and that they all represent the same value to all authors.

I still feel the same passion I always did to keep any author or aspiring author from the many traps out there designed to prey on your desire to become an author, yet that only cost you money, time, and heartache.

Terri - I respect your enthusiasm for smart people and savvy agents and authors, but if my house painter charged me 15 % of the value of my house when it sold because of the part he / she played in making it pretty — when that same job would only cost a flat fee from a painter who is ONLY painting — how is that a good deal?

Who's going to incur the cost of promoting a new book or author in New Zealand, for instance, if the sale goes to a different company in the US — you need a way to connect the sale to the promoter who bears the cost of that sale (often, but not necessarily) the same publisher who is promoting the p - book edition at considerable expense).

COST Publishers and authors may enter one book or many books in the competition for $ 59 each; discounts of over $ 10 per book are available for quantities over three books and we offer a $ 19 per book discount for 100 books entered at the same time by one party.

Cons: ~ Authors shoulder the cost of book production ~ Requires additional cost to produce two versions of the same book which adds an additional $ 300 - $ 500 to the project ~ Can be a complicated process for an Author who is self - publishing

Selling the same book on consignment works like this: You purchase author copies directly from Ingram at the print cost ($ 4.28 each, in this case).

Using the same rate for both print and e-book would undoubtedly result in a smaller share of profits for the author, especially where the upfront development costs of the book have been fully amortized in a previous print edition.

Can someone explain exactly what Amazon's ongoing costs are that require them to take nearly the same cut of revenue as the author and the publisher?

If an author can earn the same or greater income selling lower cost books, yet reach significantly more readers, then, drum roll please, it means the authors who are selling higher priced books through traditional publishers are at an extreme disadvantage to indie authors in terms of long term platform building.

Because servicing the many individual accounts of independent authors costs more than handling the bulk buys of major corporate publishers, indie authors are asked to pay what they (understandably) feel is an unfairly large chunk of change — some $ 27 at the best 10 - pack price — for the same ISBN that Penguin Random House or Simon & Schuster can get for $ 1.

As MoneySense reported last week, the Broadbent Institute report (entitled Double Trouble) authored by Jonathan Rhys Kesselman found that by the time the existing TFSA framework matures in 40 or 50 years, it will cost Ottawa as much as $ 15.5 billion annually in lost tax revenue and over the same time would «cost» the provinces another $ 9 billion.

In view of the compelling US and global evidence that both sensible and nonsensical strategies outperform for the same reasons (value and small - cap biases), the authors conclude that potential investors would do well to base strategy selections largely on a comparison of explicit and implicit implementation costs due to portfolio turnover.

While ports in Hawaii aren't governed by the same emissions regulations as those in California, the potential savings in fuel cost is attractive for the company operating the inter-island transportation service, along with anyone else suffering from high fuel expenses, the authors said.

In the same vein, the authors note that while the light - emitting diode (LED) is in fact the most energy - efficient, longest - lasting, and greenest source of artificial lighting, studies show that as the cost of lighting has decreased, total consumption has increased dramatically.