Sentences with phrase «same character from»

It doesn't even matter if players choose the same character from the four to choose from.

Another question: is this the same character from Retro City Rampage, but older, or a new character?

When The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess HD launches on March 4th it will include a Wolf Link amiibo figure based on the same character from the classic game.

Despite playing essentially the same character from 40 Year Old Virgin through Get Him to the Greek, the guy is already a bonafide comedic star who has displayed more than a shred of talent.

Frank (Skrein) is the exact same character from the previous movies.

(This is odd because, a few months ago, Sutherland explicitly said that he was the same character from the first movie but with a different name.

(Luke Evans) as Gaston seems like exactly same character from the 1991 animation movie.

What's worse breakout star Josh Wiggins is playing the same character from Hellion.

Finn and Rey make it off of Jakku with that famous guy, stop by the other planet to talk with someone who is definitely not the same character from the movie, and then the plan to take the battle to the First Order's Really, Really Death Star No We're Serious This Time commences.

During this recent interview to discuss the TV version of Zombieland, co-creators and executive producers Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick talked about the journey from TV series to movie and now back to TV pilot, what it's been like to work with Amazon, what motivated the decision to have the same characters from the movie on the TV show, how they envision it as a road show, how much gore they can have, what Kirk Ward (who was originally cast as Tallahassee before being replaced by Woody Harrelson) brings to this version of the character, what led them to the 30 - minute format, whether they could have any surprise cameos (Bill Murray made a very memorable one in the film), what will determine whether the pilot is successful enough to go to series, and when they might know if they're picked up.

Frank seamlessly replaces Chuck in Dead Rising 2's conspiratorial events, appearing in mostly the same cutscenes and conversing with the same characters from the previous game.

More convincing still, it would not feature any of the same characters from the film, and was amassing an undeniably classy cast, including Billy Bob Thornton, Martin Freeman, Bob Odenkirk, Colin Hanks, US sketch comedy dons Key & Peele, and Oliver Platt.

The «Legends» added to the name helps to signify that they will be using all of the same characters from the Hyrule Warriors game for Wii U but will also be adding two characters to the game from Legend of Zelda: Windwaker.

I was a little disappointed that they still only showed the same characters from the trailer.

I would like to see all of the same characters from the other versions but more super Herod and villans.

Not exact matches

An online video that came out in late August features the same characters in a throwback to toy ads from the late 80s or early 90s, and was more of a way to introduce the Giant Jr. name.

Jesus was an illiterate Jewish peasant / carpenter / simple, dirty (a new book), sometimes sick (the same book) preacher man who suffered from hallucinations (or «mythicizing» from P, M, M, L and J) and who has been characterized anywhere from the Messiah from Nazareth to a mythical character from mythical Nazareth to a ma - mzer from Nazareth (Professor Bruce Chilton, in his book Rabbi Jesus).

Even if Mormons believed that «The characters Lehi, Nephi, Laman, and Lemule were the founding Jews from which all inhabitants of the Americas descended,» which they don't, the DNA test of the American Indians wouldn't refute that because the book says that all the descendants of Nephi perished, and the descendants of Laman and Lemuel were changed from white to dark, i.e., their race was changed, so of necessity, their DNA was changed, too, unless all races have the same DNA, which I doubt.

Well yeah but in the same way as removing the Grinch dog from HTGSC, the supporting character is gone but it's still fiction just the same

The title «Satan» is applied for one who stands in opposition; and it is applied, in the same way as «Elohim,» across the full spectrum of scriptural characters from a) God, to b) angels, to c) human men.

The Muslim aristocracy was feudal in character, depending on levies enlisted from the middle and lower classes of Muslims, usually of the same nationality as the feudal leader.

So if what Jesus said to Philip can't be used to teach us about the nature and character of God because it's historical narrative, then this same argument applies to every text in the Bible, and you can also not use anything from the Law, the Writings, the Prophets, the Gospels, or the Epistles.

Now incorporate the eastern philosophies (A huge portion of what Jesus allegedly said came from the Buddha, Confucious and a few others) into this Jesus character... then tie the story back in to the original god (but also ver2.0 of god, same god, but a kinder, gentler vengeful god)-RRB- and voila... the «new» testament.

What this means is that the initial feeling derives its character, or subjective form, from the object felt, and insofar as it assumes the same form it reproduces the object: «In the conformal feelings the how of feeling reproduces what is felt» (PR 249).

However from the same human tongue also come lies and gossip, slander and curses, vilification and character assassination, cutting words and false witness, rumor and innuendo.

Now I realize it's stupid to think quotes from cartoon characters matter, but I do NOT understand why you don't realize the same thing.

The real danger comes from a much larger group of persons who believe that Notre Dame can strive for ever - higher standards of academic excellence — and use the same criteria of excellence by which the best secular universities in the land are judged to be excellent — without forfeiting the Catholic character of the University.

Here God's eternal character and purpose refer to his personal attributes which can to some extent be embodied by a finite being sharing the same character and purpose, in contradistinction to God's metaphysical attributes, which indicate his uniqueness from all finite beings (PC, pp. 191 - 92).

But at the same time Revelation itself enters a sphere of reality which is also determined by other forces, which indeed derive from God, the author of Revelation, but which on that account can not, in the actual form they take and in their special character, simply be derived from Revelation, which itself can not simply be identified with God as he is in himself.

Only thus will this destiny receive its true meaning and character even if, seen from outside, everything seems to be the same, whether we trustingly accept it or violently protest against the absurdity of life.

Commenting on this same text, Gordon D. Kaufman remarks: «If, now, we bring a different framework of interpretation from Jewish apocalypticism to this critical event in which Christian faith was born — as we must — we should not be overly surprised or dismayed when we find it necessary to understand the character of the event somewhat differently from the first Christians.»

We've been taught it is an evidence of our Christian faith to boycott businesses who profit from artistic contributions of these same kinds of characters.

The same metaphorical character, I am inclined to think, is not altogether absent from Paul's use of the ideas of a penalty paid and a sacrifice offered, though here the consciously metaphorical is merging into the unconsciously mythological.

But all these approaches suffer from the same defect — they can not take seriously enough the historical character of the Bible.

«No one has ever touched Zeno without refuting him,» he writes in a short essay commenting on the fundamental line of thought in his chief philosophical work, Process and Reality.16 In the same essay he explicitly distinguishes his theory from two other opposed positions: on the one hand from the view that interprets the character of becoming as illusory and becoming itself as simply empty and nonexistent in comparison with beings and their being.

«Thank you sir, may I please have another», as Neidermeyer was paddling Kevin bacon's character, from the same movie, which is my favorite comedy of all time.

«Christians... are not interested in horizontal conversions - a mere change from one's religious tradition to Christianity, leaving the person on the same level of character and way of life.»

The purpose of this distinction is to distinguish the nascent, deviant, augmentative, or spoliative character of a complex from its sphere of dominance while at the same time consigning neither to the status of lesser reality.

Satan did it, and fell... man, seduced by the father of lies, and lust for power has allowed pride to swell up in his heart, has done the same... Scriptures were written long ago, but we see them fulfilled with our own eyes (Dan.12: 4) There has never been time as such we're living in, when man is so advanced, yet the deprivation of human character on WORLDWIDE scale, is unprecedented from any time in history of mankind!

Robespierre's address to the Commune of Paris at the convention of 1793 evidences that his Supreme Being also had this same character: «L'homme pervers se croit sans cesse environné d'un témoin puissant et terrible anquel il ne peut échapper, qui le voit et le veille, tandis que les hommes sont livrés au sommeil...» (F. A. Aulard, Le Culte de la raison et le culte de l'Être Supreme (Paris, 1892), pp. 285 f.) How can one isolate this «structure» and separate it from its biblical antecedents, when — to cite only one of the many passages — one can read in the book of Isaiah (29:15): «Woe to those who hide deep from the Lord their counsel, whose deeds are in the dark, and who say, «Who sees us?

What the Old and New Testaments together seem to say is that on their understanding of God the character of the primordial and the eschatological must be the same; there must always have been in God from the beginning that which is needed for him to be Savior in the end.

It is also a question of peculiar force to us, because we must fully admit the highly individualistic character of a believer's faith - image, and yet, at the same time, face the question of which, if any, are to be called «Christian», and so face the necessity of distinguishing true from false.

The moment I saw the first released photo of Daniel Day Lewis in character as Lincoln I knew for sure he would sweep each and every award out there, and I have the feeling Steve Carell will do the same with Foxcatcher — you can come back here months from now and either congratulate me or make fun of me.

«I like the new concept of multiple embossing and this bottle is unique: four different bottles for the same purpose but with a slightly different character,» said Jan - Willem Ridt from Pont Europe.

We're making a wine that shows its varietal character of green apple while at the same time incorporating some spicy notes from the barrel fraction.

«From superheroes to superspies, our fans are accustomed to and enjoy different takes on the same character.

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

The Public Health Advocacy Institute («PHAI») has urged the USDA to put a provision in the agency's proposed wellness policy rules that would prohibit companies from using brand names, logos, characters, etc. on school product packaging if those same marketing elements are also used on products which don't meet the Smart Snacks nutritional requirements.

Here are the results: Just 15 years ago, then - Vice President Dan Quayle publicly scolded a fictional television character, Murphy Brown, from the prime - time sitcom of the same name, for choosing to have a child on her own.

In the games you see all the familiar characters and hear the same music and sound effects from the TV show.