Sentences with phrase «same character over»

Last but not least for this section, the Weapon Triangle also shows it's face, which means while it's all well and good using the same character over and over again, it's not when you're on a tough to beat level and you insist on using a unit that is weak against the unit you are fighting like using Chrome against Hinoka, or Cordelia against Takumi as Archers can take down fliers in no time at all, but I have to admit, there really is nothing quite like flying around a battlefield, waiting to strike on an unsuspecting victim, even if that victim is an archer.

When: February 28th Why: Liam Neeson has certainly made a go of this whole action star phase over the past few years, but even he must be growing tired of playing what's essentially the same character over and over again.

With all the adulation I can give Mr. Neeson, It just seems that he is being typecast into playing the same character over and over.

Unfortunately, Neeson is playing the exact same character over and over again, so if you've seen Taken, Non-Stop, A Walk Among the Tombstones, ect... then you pretty much already seen this movie.

They're the ones who get bored playing the same character over and over and over again and crave the variety.

Last but not least for this section, the Weapon Triangle also shows it's face, which means while it's all well and good using the same character over and over again, it's not when you're on a tough to beat level and you insist on using a unit that is weak against the unit you are fighting like using Chrome against Hinoka, or Cordelia against Takumi as Archers can take down fliers in no time at all, but I have to admit, there really is nothing quite like flying around a battlefield, waiting to strike on an unsuspecting victim, even if that victim is an archer.

You're right, it feels like I'm playing as the same characters over and over again.

I'm not saying anything bad about their performances, as they were really good, but just starting to get tired of seeing them play the same characters over and over.

Especially since I tended to grow attached to and use the same characters over and over again, never developing a particularly deep bench.

Not exact matches

At the time, people on Twitter speculated which name Markle would go by if she and Prince Harry got married, while «Suits» fans freaked out over the fact that Rachel is the same name as her character on the USA Network show.

A man who's books I bought, seminars I went to and when I brought up my hurt over that, the same two characters I listed earlier among others asked me weird questions.

Over the last fifteen years or so I have seen (and been moved by) many of the aspirational / inspirational billboards sponsored by The Foundation for a Better Life, an organization that promotes common - ground character virtues while trying at the same time to avoid being a partisan in our contemporary....

In The Philosopher's Pupil (1983) a man's life is changed by his vision of a flying saucer; a key episode in The Good Apprentice turns on what appears to be the effects of a love potion; a young girl in The Green Knight exerts an involuntary telekinesis over the stones that she has collected in her room; in the same novel the goodness of a man named Peter Mir (Mir meaning, in Russian, both «world» and «peace,» as several characters note) seems to be contagious, bringing sweet dreams and love to those with whom he comes in contact.

Hinds» support of Catholic schools is documented in a speech in April 2014 where he says: «If they [Catholic schools] were open to all, they would lose their distinctive character - not immediately, but over time» and «a half - Catholic school is not the same thing as a Catholic school».

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibiOver used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibiover 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

The Soccer Saturday pundit does, however, acknowledge questions over Shaw's character stem back to his time at Southampton, while suggesting his form has not reached the same level since suffering a broken leg in 2015.

«I would urge all of you to look into these fascinating interconnections and potential motives and the cast of characters, because we keep seeing the same thing over and over.

«It is very curious that paragraph 4 (1) of the recommendations of the Kingibe panel prescribes that a serving director should be picked as the director - general, only for the same characters that sat in judgment over the need to reorganise the NIA, turning around to violate its own recommendations, by picking one of them to contemptuously assume duty as head of the NIA.

«Like Bill Murray's character in the movie Groundhog Day, homeless people in New York have been hearing the same thing over and over again.

In the classic movie Groundhog Day, the main character — played famously by actor and comedian Bill Murray — finds he is trapped in a time loop, repeating the same day over and over again.

Despite the lessening of madcap energy, Shrek the Third is still quite funny in parts, with some fresh throwaway gags to produce chuckles now and then from characters you'd think they probably should have jettisoned long ago, but are secretly glad they've kept around (the Gingerbread Man, Pinocchio, etc.) The fact that they are keeping in nearly all of the characters introduced in the series thus far is a bit of a double - edged sword, as they do provide a certain respite from the main characters that are already cycling through the same jokes all over again, but on the other hand, it's getting to the point that the high overhead of injecting scenes for all of these characters takes away from the focus of the story at large.

However, Nostalgia just keeps hitting the same note over and over, climaxing with a character spelling the movie's themes out during a final exchange.

I will admit I had some trepidation when I first heard they were making another season of Stranger Things, and this is exactly why: it doesn't make sense that this same town keeps getting attacked over and over by horrors from beyond, plus now all the mystery of the first season is drained away and it is nearly impossible to create believable drama for the characters that can compare with

A few characters carry over from the first, including Karan Soni's cabbie, T.J. Miller's barfly, and Brianna Hildebrand's C - list X-Man (Negasonic Teenage Warhead), but their roles are minor, mostly there to placate fans looking for more of the same.

The original was already pretty repetitive so to do the same thing over with less interesting characters, randomised dungeons and less gameplay distractions is a big ask.

A key incentive is meant to be unlocking each of the 80 - odd different characters, but not only does this mean repeating the same missions over and over again but there's very little meaningful variety outside the first handful of main characters.

Because this movie started out as a play with the same cast, all four actors have worked over every facet of their characters so carefully that each gesture and intonation has weight — nothing is an accident or a throwaway.

Expect it to look better than the slightly cheap original, with visually adept helmer Francis Lawrence taking over from Gary Ross, though whether he's capable of placing the same emphasis on character as his predecessor remains to be seen.

«It's still some of the same characters, but also new younger characters; it's a little bit like the sons take over.»

Marvel did the same thing with Spider - Man in the second Civil War trailer, but they had to begin winning people over to the third iteration of the character in less than ten years.

Smith's new backstory is perhaps meant to justify her continued presence better than the original show is remembered for doing with its Smith, but it's a fairly one - note character with whom even the great Posey can only do so much, especially with the same mendacious beats repeated over and over again.

In addition to having to individually equip everyone's weapons, you also need to teach every character the same skills over and over.

Audiences has spent upwards of a decade changing into emotionally invested in lots of of those similar characters, and the MCU itself has completely modified the blockbuster panorama over that very same time.

Perez's most spellbinding moment takes place in the middle of a crowded shopping mall, when her character, Carla, spots a mother holding a baby about the same age as her dead son and hovers over the child like a ghost, apparently unseen despite being inches away; the look on Perez's face communicates both intense longing and boundless wonder, as if she's simultaneously working through the reality of death and suddenly comprehending the miracle of life.

Example: As each character enters the picture, they get a Facebook - style voice - over intro — name, age, relationship status — accompanied by pop - up captions with the same details scrawled out, repetition that will either annoy you or amuse you.

Fans of the original American Pie trilogy may be somewhat pleased that Eugene Levy (For Your Consideration, Over the Hedge) takes a more substantial role here playing the same dopey character that delivered big laughs in the first film.

I'm sure they will re-use the same engine and maybe port over characters, but other than that I'm pretty confident it will be a new game.

In order to make Silent Hill 2 work we need to be focusing on making the characters real by having high - quality textures, and at the same time we must improve the gameplay so people will feel, even though its really horrific, we must make them want to play the game over and over.

And yet, Pacific Rim is suffused with the same dark, gothic hues as Gotham City or Metropolis, along with hard - eyed characters brooding over tragedies in their pasts.

Even though it sounds like we're using the same story over and over again, we're actually telling it from different angles and using different characters.

The screenwriters, along with directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, are in it for the long haul — from the chief's speech to an end - credits sequence that imagines this series some 30 sequels into the future, with each successive one making a flimsier and more ridiculous excuse to get these two characters into the same shenanigans over and over again.

It's quite smart, really; each character feels the same, so there is some kind of consistency to the game, but the special ability allows the game to feel somewhat fresh over the course of the 12 or so hours that it will take to complete.

But it is great fun all the same that soars on the appeal of characters, story, and details of this delicious, textured universe that Nolan has developed over the past seven years.

It's also an opportunity to pull off something that doesn't happen everyday: to make three films over the course of a generation with the same actors playing the same characters.

Yes, your character may die which means having to restart the current sequence all over again, but you will still end up more or less with the same result.

This premise allows for some clever touches, like the boxes listing each character's strengths and weaknesses that pop up when they put their hands over their hearts and auxiliary characters like Rhys Darby's Nigel, who delivers the same rote series of lines on a loop.

This time, Nicholas Stoller's directing and Jason Segel wrote and stars in what I think is supposed to be a comedy along the same lines — you know, clever banter, «normal guy» characters who we can relate to, and some very R - rated humor that goes over just fine despite its raunchiness because, somehow, they make it work.

In the 2014 sequel to 21 Jump Street, Hill and Tatum return — just like their characters are instructed — for the meta task of doing the same thing all over again, but on a college campus.

Worst - case scenario: That affection and respect spills over to the people behind the camera, and the movie traffics in the same toxic self - regard as other Meyers movies (including at least one scene where characters compliment each other on the witty lines provided for them by the filmmaker).

It's a first person account but when we started making the movie we realized Sarah Ford can not be the same character carried over from the book.