Not exact matches
Powertrain choices remain the
same — a 2.5 - liter four - cylinder or a 3.5 - liter V - 6 with a six - speed automatic, and a 2.5 - liter Hybrid Synergy Drive system with a CVT — but we wouldn't be surprised to see a slight
fuel economy bump over the current Camry's 25/35 mpg (
city / highway) ratings with the four - cylinder and 21/31 mpg ratings with the V - 6.
At the
same time,
city / highway
fuel economy jumps to 23/37 mpg for the manual and 28/40 mpg for the automatic (preliminary estimates).
When it arrives at showrooms next month, the Prius C will be offered in four trim levels, all of which receive the
same 53/46/50 mpg (
city / highway / combined)
fuel economy ratings.
It's rated at 138 hp and 148 lb - ft of torque in all applications, and achieves the
same fuel economy here as in the Sonic LTZ: 29/40 mpg
city / highway with the six - speed manual or 27/31 mpg with the six - speed automatic.
At the
same time,
fuel economy is unimpressive at 21/28 mpg (
city / highway), which is no better than the far more powerful Ford Escape, whose turbo 2.0 - liter bristles with an additional 64 hp and 99 pound - feet of torque.
Peak output is the
same 200 hp as the Camry Hybrid, and the
fuel economy rating is 40/39 mpg (
city / highway).
That engine makes up to 255 hp, but in front - wheel - drive form it achieves the
same fuel economy as the larger V - 6, rated at 17 mpg in the
city and 27 mpg on the highway.
Cadillac says its V wagon will get the
same EPA
fuel economy rating as the sedan: 14 mpg
city and 19 mpg highway.
Fuel economy remains much the
same as before in front - wheel - drive trim at 19 mpg
city and 28 mpg highway (1 mpg less for each in all - wheel - drive trim).
The
fuel economy is remaining the
same with EPA
city / highway rating of 21/28 mpg.
This
same engine also gives drivers the highly efficient
fuel economy rating of 33
city and 41 highway.
And that also means it gets the
same Government
Fuel Economy Ratings of 35 -
City and 40 - highway.
Both trims will offer the
same EPA estimated
fuel economy rating of 39 mpg
city, 38 mpg highway, and 38 mpg combined.
Interestingly, the
fuel economy estimates are the
same: 21 combined, 18
city, and 26 highway mpg.
Fuel economy drops a bit in the 4x4 standard - wheelbase model to 15 mpg
city and 20 mpg highway for a combined 17 mpg rating — the
same numbers as the extended - wheelbase 4x2 model.
Ford answers that with three V - 8 engines and says the entry - level engine, a 4.6 - liter V - 8 with two valves per cylinder, will get the
same fuel economy as the current 4.2 - liter V - 6 engine, which is 14 mpg
city, 19 mpg highway with an automatic transmission.
The new 2.0 - liter 4 - cylinder base engine in the Forte sedan / Forte5 hatchback offers the
same power as last year's 1.8 - liter but better
city fuel economy with the popular automatic transmission.
Those numbers are essentially the
same as last year's smaller engine, but this engine gets notably better
city fuel economy.
Granted, there is a slight
fuel economy penalty (the 2015 Q3 Quattro is rated at roughly the
same in the
city and 0.7 L / 100 km more on the highway).
The base 1.6 engine, as before, is no barn burner, but if
fuel economy is high on your list, opt for the automatic with ISG and you'll get the
same highway mileage as the manual and better
city fuel economy.
EPA estimated
fuel economy for the standard - length Escalade and extended - length Escalade ESV is the
same: 14 mpg
city / 23 mpg highway with rear - wheel drive and 14/21 with four - wheel drive.
In Canada, the 2013 C - MAX Hybrid was given the
same fuel economy rating (4.0 L / 100 km
city / 4.1 L / 00 km highway) as the Fusion Hybrid, under a Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN) provision allowing grouping by family.
In what should be a selling point, both offer the
same fuel economy rating of 39 mpg
city, 38 mpg highway and 38 mpg combined.
While the 2017 Pacifica gets essentially the
same fuel economy as the 2017 Sienna, the 2017 Grand Caravan is inferior here as well, with 17 mpg
city, 25 mpg highway that falls far short of the 2017 Sienna's 19 mpg
city, 27 mpg highway.
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is rated for 21 mpg in the
city and 30 mpg on the highway, and although the official Mercedes - Benz GLA
fuel -
economy ratings aren't yet available, the
same turbocharged engine in the GLA also powers the CLA.
Being very similar iterations of the
same base engine, there's not really much to separate them in terms of
fuel economy (both versions return 19mpg in the
city, irrespective of how many wheels are being driven, and the 400 - hp's 26mpg in all - wheel drive and 27mpg in rear - wheel drive formats are only one miles - per - gallon down on what the 300 - hp unit can muster), so there's very little holding you back if you can stomach the Red Sport's $ 7,000 premium over the lesser six - cylinder model.
You don't get the
same get - up - and - go as the 2.7, but there's still power enough here to keep you comfortably at highway speeds, with better
fuel economy to boot (Ford claims 13.6 and 9.8 L / 100 km for the Sport in
city and highway conditions respectively, and 11.8 / 8.4 for the Titanium with the 2.0).
Mated to a responsive, paddle - shiftable 8 - speed Tiptronic automatic transmission teamed with Audi's Quattro AWD system, the engine takes this handsome and notably lighter hauler from 0 - 60 mph in a claimed 5.7 seconds, gives it a stellar 7,700 - pound towing capability, and earns 19 mpg
city / 25 mpg highway
fuel economy numbers from the EPA compared to the 16/22 comparative stats of the previous - generation Q7 with the
same powertrain.
The fact that it still runs on regular and gets virtually the
same fuel economy as the smaller four - banger (the
city figure drops by 1 MPG to 18) further cements the case for the 2.3.
The smaller engine has a
fuel economy rating of 13 miles per gallon around town and 16 miles per gallon on the highway, while the larger motor sees the
same city mileage and 17 miles per gallon during highway cruising.
Both versions of the 2016 MINI Cooper Paceman feature a six - speed manual transmission, and both feature the
same EPA
fuel economy ratings of 25 mpg
city and 31 mpg highway.
Both vehicles have the
same estimated
fuel economy, with up to 22 mpg in the
city and 30 mpg on the highway.
i like the 2009Maxima's better
fuel economy than the 2008 model: 1 mpg on the Highway, the
same in the
city.
Ford's design aimed for the C - Max Hybrid to deliver better
fuel economy than the Toyota Prius v. [18] Ford had reduced its estimated
fuel economy twice, once in 2013 and again in 2014, with the second revision placing
fuel economy below the Prius V. [19] The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initially rated the hybrid model at 47 mpg ‑ US (5.0 L / 100 km; 56 mpg ‑ imp) with the
same rating for combined /
city / highway cycles.
The 4x4 trims with the
same base engine have a
fuel economy of 14 mpg
city and 19 mpghwy.
Same goes for EPA numbers: according to MB, since the 4MATIC system has the least parasitic effect on both emissions and
fuel economy compared to their German rivals,
city / highway mpg figures of 16/24 for the sedan and 15/23 for the wagon seem not far off the mark.
These 270 (3.0 - liter) and 306 (3.6 - liter) horsepower units can be had with either a six - speed manual or a six - speed automatic transmission, and they post the
same fuel economy (18 mpg
city / 27 mpg highway), which means you won't have to choose between efficiency and speed.
At the
same time,
fuel economy ratings of 20 in the
city and 24 on the highway — while not dramatically high numbers — are a big step up from the gasoline powered variant, which has
city fuel economy in the mid-teens.
And its
fuel economy - 17 mpg
city, 24 highway, according to EPA projections, just more than 22 in my week with a test car - puts those
same sport - utilities to shame.
Fuel economy for the Volkswagen - which also offers the
same pair of six - speed transmissions found in the Jetta - is listed at 31 - mpg
city and 43 - mpg highway, numbers which can easily be bettered during steady - state cruising.
The
fuel economy ratings of the two engines are the
same: 19 mpg
city, 29 mpg highway.The new engine gives the Camaro / Firebird an even greater horsepower edge over the base Mustang engine.
The Avalon is rated at 19 mpg
city, 28 mpg highway, while the Impala (with the 3.5 - liter V - 6) is rated at 18 mpg
city, 29 mpg highway, giving both cars the
same average
fuel economy.
Some consumers may also want to look at the Toyota Prius (MSRP $ 22,120; 51
city / 48 hwy) has better
fuel economy and is outfitted with the
same power train.
Fitting all - wheel drive, though, does already have a noticeable impact on the Genesis G80's already unimpressive
fuel economy figures: all - wheel drive models can only return 16mpg in the
city and 25mpg on the highway, with rear - wheel drive G80s able to return 18mpg and 28mpg in the
same respective categories (for reference, a rear - wheel drive Jaguar XF with a similarly - sized and more powerful six - cylinder engine can return 23mpg in the
city and 29mpg on the highway).
At the
same time, EPA
fuel economy comes in at 22 mpg
city and 31 mpg highway, the all - wheel - drive option bringing it down a little over the front - wheel - drive version.
Fuel economy is almost the
same on all its trim and drivetrain combinations, but the 4 - Cylinder Front - wheel drive is the best performer with an EPA estimated 21 MPG
City and 27 MPG Highway.
It provides slightly better highway
fuel economy than the automatic at 37 mpg, but the
same 30 mpg estimate for
city fuel mileage.
The base price is $ 20,695 and it offers the
same 24
city / 33 highway
fuel economy as the automatic.
This one will probably have
same numbers in
city / highway
fuel economy like its predecessor 28/34 mpg for the (FWD) and 27/33 mpg for the (AWD).
C - MAX Hybrid, however, returns the
same fuel economy whether driving cross-country or across the
city — resulting mostly from a growing list of Ford innovations that have helped the vehicle to deliver metrics such as a top speed of up to 62 mph (100 km / h) in EV mode.