Sentences with phrase «same claim only»

Not exact matches

(An inventor would need to claim the earlier date only if prior art surfaced after the PPA's filing date but before the filing date of the regular application, or if a patent application the same invention was filed by another inventor and the PTO has to decide which applicant should get the patent.)

Mills may be an original, but he's certainly not the only one to have developed a «particular set of skills» over the course of a career — lots of people on LinkedIn claim to have done the exact same thing.

Instead, it sits in a PTO file and is examined only if the inventor files a regular patent application on the same invention within a one - year period and the applicant wishes to claim the earlier filing date.

The «fib» to which Journal was clearly referring was the government's claim, made repeatedly in those same court filings, that it was only interested in cracking the San Bernardino case, not in setting a precedent.

SanDisk claims that only U3 - compatible programs will run on such a drive, but I had no problem running U3 and non-U3 programs side by side on the same memory stick.

Contrary to Trump's and Republicans» claims that Page became a subject of scrutiny only because of the dossier and his work on the Trump campaign, The Wall Street Journal reported last week the Page had been on counterintelligence officials» radar since 2013 — more than three years before he joined the campaign, and the same year he sent the letter touting his Russia connections.

Seems that same folks that discredited Patriots against Scuds as faked results are same as citical now, They were correct then, and claim that Dome can ONLY hit when headon targeting, not passing as some claim and show.

Never mind that this is the same Conservative «plan» that contributed to Canada experiencing the only recession among major industrial economies so far this year. Claiming «victory» because GDP is growing again after a recession, is a bit like commenting on how good it feels to stop beating your head against the wall. Before popping any champagne, we'd better pause to ask: why were we beating our heads against the wall in the first place?

Since from what you say «not assigning gods nonexistence a «true»» you aren't rejecting the possibility of a God only it can't be proven which like you said would be Agnostic Atheist and is not the same as someone who claims there is no god and rejects the possibility of it.

Considering that story wasnt even created until a few hundred years after the supposed «ressurection», and the fact that the story exists only in your fable book (also compiled, and edited hundreds of years later), I do nt think claiming it to be true is the same as, you know, being true.

As a matter of prudence, prioritizing the wrongness of same - sex marriage over divorce or contraception (or even masturbation) only serves to reinforce the claim that Christians are motivated by some kind of anti-gay animus when they defend traditional marriage laws.

Most Christians don't understand how others might see it as hate when they make the claim that their heaven & heII exists and that those not invited to heaven are going to go to heII to be tormented and tortured for eternity and the only way to salvation is to accept their God as your Lord and Savior... They think to themselves that they are just trying to help by condemning those they dislike and who don't worship the same way they do, but that doesn't change it from what it is, «hate filled».

(Hence the quotes) Not only is such a declaration false... this poster has made the exact same claim in the past and been corrected, thus revealing an intent to deceive.

You claim it to be evidence of god, and that is only because you WANT it to be god, so claim evidence of same.

insisted that his only claim to being the wisest man in Greece lay in the fact that he knew nothing, while everyone else was in the same boat, but claimed to have the truth.

They only make themselves and their cause appear frivolous by claiming that military force is immoral and futile, and, at the same time, wanting to have a political say in how such force is to be employed.

It claims to be a religion of piece, just like christianity, but that is only with one caveat... you must be a member of the same religion, if you are not, then you aren't in our club and it's ok to mistreat them.

As neil degrasse tyson pointed out, each of our great mathematicians and scientists throughout the centuries reached their limit and declared God did it... only to have the next guy push though that barrier, reach their own limit... and claim the same... This lady has the benefit of history and science at her finger tips, and judging by her credentials is no stranger to the scientific process, and still fell into the same trap...

Islam mentioned this for the longest time and as you can imagine, at a time when people had no access or means to verify those claims (people like yourself, opted to disbelief and argue about the existence of God) but now that those scientific «discoveries» became realities and the same as supported by the Quran (that was sent to Prophet Mohammed, Peace and Blessings be upon him), from God), it only solidifies Islam as the true religion of God.

I have a thought for your kind consideration: If you really believe that each person should be accountable for his deeds ONLY, then by the same logic, you must accept the fact that it is gross injustice to claim that Jesus took everyones sins on his shoulders.

It does appear that what is involved is just this, the transmission of form, reproduction being the assumption of the same form, and consequently it would seem that Whitehead can not claim in any strict sense that one thing is in another but only that one thing is like another.

I claim that Vosper, rather than blowing her own horn or trying to make a buck off the church while she can — as some have accused — is actually working in the spirit of Bishop Pike to bring about this same honest re-examination of traditional beliefs, polity, and social awareness and action as someone who appreciates the tradition and all it holds dear, but only in a different way than the church would wish.

It needs to be noted that two distinct claims have been made here: First, that God is a conscious and self - conscious being; and second, that there is an aspect of God that relates to us in our mode of existence as conscious personal beings, and that we can appropriately relate back to God only in this same way.

The promotion of the Peters Projection thus seems to have taken on some of the same single - mindedness as claims for an «only true faith» or a panacea patent medicine.

You can't in one breath identify the spiritual crowd as separate individuals rejecting one belief or set of beliefs, and then in the next claim they share the same ideas about sin and only want to «experience nice things.»

Perhaps too it is only a slight overemphasis to claim that all answers are the same answer, and that through the centuries man has merely sublimated and refined the answers which his most remote ancestors first vaguely apprehended.

Pannenberg claims that this can only be found in the apocalyptic expectation of a general resurrection, but I wish to propose an alternative to accomplish the same purpose.

If the same people who claim these commitments are also swayed by presidential candidates who offer only the most tangential, glancing, elliptical, and facile engagements with the texts they themselves claim to hold dear, then the emperor and his public square are, if not naked, then leaving little to the imagination.

I am not claiming here that DNA is a machine, only that there is an image of a machine that can react as complexly with its environment, and in the same ways, as DNA does.

The first heresy, Modalism, claims that there are three terms for the same God, and the only difference is where this God appears and at what time.

... Much of the ongoing debate will focus on claims that same - sex marriage will intrude on the religious rights of those whose faith tells them that the institution should be open only for opposite - sex couples.

The only defense the poster has provided is that same claim, plus the word «proven» at the end, as if that somehow magically made it so.

but i have a new idea for what believers think god is... and it may actually exist and funny enough is only tested thru its effect on other objects — kinda like a black hole — the collective conscienceness of every living thing... since we all are part of the same energies and have in some form or another a conscienciness, i believe that collective is what the believers claim is god — the collective being felt and moved like any conscienceness but with the power to effect us all as we all play into it — as long as we are open to it... your thoughts?

And you only say that kind of thing once someone actually points out your unjustified assertions of it being true, while in the same breath claiming that you only offer opinion?

At the same time, those who claimed that embryonic research was the only promising way forward can unite around a promising new technique that presents no ethical dilemmas.

Now the obvious Bergsonian objection to this whole line of reasoning is that Peirce's arguments are telling only against the claim to have an intuitive knowledge which is at the same time conceptual.

Claiming that evil exists in order to allow us free will is fine and dandy until you wake up and realize that the «evil» in Colorado that night was allowed to happen by the same God who would allow a baby bird to fall from a nest only to be picked apart by fire ants and maggots.

Insiders claim Woolworths is confident it has not done anything wrong and that Mind the Gap only attracted attention because the retailer went to a large number of suppliers at the same time.

(3) A nutrition content claim about choline, fluoride or folic acid may be made only if a health claim about that substance is made in relation to the same food.

Once nutrient profiles are established, nutrition claims may only be used on food products deemed «healthy», though two notable exceptions will apply: nutrition claims referring to the reduction of fat, saturated fats, trans fats, sugars and salt / sodium will be allowed without reference to a profile for the specific nutrient, provided the claims comply with the conditions of the Regulation; and a nutrition claim may be used even if a single nutrient exceeds the nutrient profile as long as a statement in relation to this nutrient appears on the label in close proximity to, on the same side and with the same prominence, as the claim (the statement must read: «High [name of nutrient] content»).

Both teams are back, but only one of them can claim the same legacy of sadness.

This season has been a mirror of the last 12 seasons and I'm sorry but if we claim to be a big club not only capable of competing as well as capable of actually winning the league then the fans have every right to be absolutely livid if the title challenge went exactly the same way it has as the last 12.

Van Dijk does not see things quite the same way though and has now not only handed in a formal transfer request but has released a statement complaining about the way his current club are dealing with him and claiming that there has been transfer interest in him from more than one source, The Mirror reports.

I really have zero faith in Joseph, for the same reason you claim Lynch is already a bust after only two seasons.

The players have a desire to win the biggest, most lucrative trophies in football, not stay at the same club for their entire career, trying to win things under a manager that can only claim that there is ambition.

The Express claim that while the Colombian winger is already eyeing a transfer in the same year that he joined the club, Jose Mourinho could also be willing to sell — but only if a replacement is found first.

Our side capitulated and suffered three goals in only 11 minutes early in the second half, and many have claimed that this is the same old Arsenal, with this stage of the competition proving to be a curse for our side year on year.

we will end up with the guy from West Brom I can feel it in my bones, Wenger above all looks to save the club money and for whatever reason this is ALWAYS his priority like with transfer windows past he goes through ALL the flim flam of approaching clubs and players with 40 % less money than what they are asking for ONLY so it can be claimed later that «We tried to sign the player but it was too complicated and the seller was asking too much» same old Arsenal same old Wenger

The same article from the Spanish tabloid claims that the Gunners are so far the only club who have registered interest in the player and have made an offer to sign him.

Unfortunately the ruling only applied to advertising and Nestlé continued to make the same claims elsewhere and in shareholder meetings.