Sentences with phrase «same claims about»

They have to realize that everyone else is going to be making the same claims about themselves so very quickly, all résumés start to look the same.»

Its the same claims about the same entities, so you can not separate these cases.

Carbon Brief take a break from getting their knickers in a twist about what the GWPF and Daily Mail are up to, to cover the same claims about subsidies.

People have been making the same claims about the Russian heat wave earlier this summer, yet the Russians insist that nothing like it has been seen for at least 1,000 years.

They do make the same claims about the food containing high quality protein.

That filing contained no details, but Connor has repeated the same claims about Teachout's non-residency in a petition filed last week in Supreme Court in Brooklyn.

I think you're the fool, the media made the same claims about Mourinho when he came back to Chelsea and even with previous PL experience he eventually got sacked after one season.

Ignorant religious bigots made the same claim about keeping interracial marriage illegal.

You could presumably make the same claim about Quantitative Easing, but that is not a valid reason not to do it.

Would anyone make the same claim about U.S. private schools today, or under JFK?

I'm curious... did you make the same claim about the Wikileaks emails?

Not exact matches

A woman named Colleen Gallagher, represented by the same law firm, is also a plaintiff in a 2014 lawsuit in the same court alleging that Bayer AG's claims about the health benefits of its One A Day multivitamins misled consumers.

Did it make any sense to treat claims about Clinton and Obama being literal, sulphur - smelling demons with the same kind of objectivity as allegations about email use?

The same is true of the FBI's claims about how it came to arrest Winner,» The Intercept said in a statement on its website.

The ColorQube copiers start at $ 21,300 — pricey but in the same range as a conventional office printer — and Xerox claims they can slash the cost of color documents from 8 cents to about 3 cents per page.

Around the same time that Ms. Clifford was talking to Slate, a former Playboy model, Karen McDougal, sold exclusive rights to her story about an affair she claimed to have had with Mr. Trump to American Media Inc., the company that owns The National Enquirer, The Journal reported shortly before the presidential election.

The designs all promote the same entrepreneurial course, which claims to help business owners spread awareness about their company.

He told the audience that if they want to do something to help journalists, they should support blog TechDirt and its founder Mike Masnick, who is being sued by the same lawyer who led Hogan's lawsuit against Gawker over stories TechDirt published about Shiva Ayyadurai, who claims to have invented email.

This same claim can be stated about fiat currency, specifically the US dollar.

Taking into consideration WeWork's Finance Chief's recent statements about not making a profit, seeing WeWork's desperate attempts at attracting new clients to fill up its spaces, and Neumann's claimed sale of shares, the question is: Is WeWork headed in the same direction as Ouvah?

To support the same, the AvaTrade trading platform offers excellent claims about the trading company aiming towards the creation of some user - centered trading experience for the traders of the company.

Surely he is aware that millions of people have relied on that same method throughout history, and through it have come to diametrically and often violently opposed conclusions about the identity, nature, and desires of the being they claim to be perceiving.

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

I ask this for three reasons: 1) Warfield begins the chapter with Edward Gibbon's conversion to Catholicism, which was related to Gibbon's belief in the continuation of the miraculous; 2) he spends several pages in the same chapter critiquing another famous convert to Catholicism, John Henry Newman, noting what he sees as Newman's shift toward the miraculous; 3) even though he knows that Gregory of Nyssa, Athanasius, and Jerome all wrote about saints in which the miraculous was prominent, he still makes the claim that these «saints» lives» follow other Christian romances and thus represent an infusion of Heathenism into the church.

And that had absolutely nothing to do with his post about applying the same rigors of evidence that you would apply to a number of other claims.

So here you quote a single verse that makes four claims about me, three of which I know to be flat - out lies and the fourth condemning a practice that is lauded repeatedly elsewhere in the same book (loving people).

Before you suggested I either believed in your god or don't so why should I claim is an evil monster and therefore should not make comments about same, is that correct?

Exactly my point; if according to the Bible and Christ's words himself — that even the Son of God has no idea about the 2nd coming; I am now supposed to believe what men on earth say??!!!!! Seriously, how stupid are some people — these are the same people who claim they are religious elite!

As for the claim that if one simply waits long enough with an open heart, God will reveal Himself — that same argument is made by just about every religion.

It's the same movement that has created an untold number of click - bait stories about celebrities who do not claim, or even have interest in, Christianity.

I don't think the metaphysical Jesus that Paul claims to have encountered (in a vision) was real, or that he was the same Jesus known as Yeshua the Nazorean, and I don't think that there is any validity to the theology that Christians believe about Jesus, because those beliefs start with Paul and smack of the Gentile theology of that era.

Tokarsky of Moscow reported that 80 percent of the 700 alcoholics he had treated were cured, and Wiamsky of Saratow claimed about the same percentage of cures out of the 319 cases he treated.

«The same - sex civil marriage debate is not about anyone's private behavior,» they claim, «but about legal recognition.

My 20 yrs in Africa has revealed Americans who claim they care about 20,000 children dying every day from hunger and disease are guilty of the same useless rhetoric they criticize in politicians who are at least trying to stop unnecessary daily deaths in this country, by getting elected and passing moral laws.

REGARDLESS OF AUTHORSHIP (last week's debate), it is factually demonstrable that the FINAL FORM of the NT considers the God of the OT to be the VERY SAME God it is writing about (against Dr Baden's claim).

By invoking the memory of Galileo's struggle with the church in the same breath with the «revolutions in science» associated with Newton, Darwin and Einstein and the claim that science transforms our self - understanding, the writers fall into a stereotype about the warfare between science and religious faith and they exhibit a 19th - century common belief that science will displace religion.

People claimed the same sorts of things you are claiming about civil rights.

(2) CE could be «just an experience» in the same sense that pain could be so considered, i.e., with no cognitive significance, no (objective) cognitive claim about its causes; it could be completely non-propositional and have no belief component.

Islam mentioned this for the longest time and as you can imagine, at a time when people had no access or means to verify those claims (people like yourself, opted to disbelief and argue about the existence of God) but now that those scientific «discoveries» became realities and the same as supported by the Quran (that was sent to Prophet Mohammed, Peace and Blessings be upon him), from God), it only solidifies Islam as the true religion of God.

In the Gallup survey, for example, 90 percent of the public claimed to have thought about «living a worthwhile life» at least a fair amount (or a lot) during the preceding two years; 83 percent said they had thought often about their «basic values in life»; 81 percent gave the same response for «your relation to God»; and 70 percent gave similar answers for «developing your faith.»

What about all the other gods, all the other religions they make the exact same claim as you without any proof and history has shown over and over again those gods didn't exist either.

I claim that Vosper, rather than blowing her own horn or trying to make a buck off the church while she can — as some have accused — is actually working in the spirit of Bishop Pike to bring about this same honest re-examination of traditional beliefs, polity, and social awareness and action as someone who appreciates the tradition and all it holds dear, but only in a different way than the church would wish.

For example, a proposition asserting a strong predicative claim about the general truth - value of the propositions Cretans normally utter can not itself be of the same status or order as they (even in the case when this «meta - proposition» is itself uttered by a Cretan).

I agree with the point of your article, BUT your reference to a «conditional covenant» is the same reasoning that leads to protesters at soldiers» funerals and claims that Hurricane Katrina is an act of God's wrath (although I don't think there was agreement on what God was mad about).

You can't in one breath identify the spiritual crowd as separate individuals rejecting one belief or set of beliefs, and then in the next claim they share the same ideas about sin and only want to «experience nice things.»

If, as science claims (and its claims are stronger because they are verifiable empirically), the objective meaning of the world is what science says it is, then theological talk (if it claims to talk about the same world) must be metaphorical and subjective.

However, in a recently published paper, this same author makes some very different claims about the age of geological features of the Australian landscape.

Most people don't actually want to talk about Jesus, they either want to throw Jesus into every conversation as if that somehow is the same thing or gripe about those who claim to follow him.

The same claim could be made about every piece of religious literature ever written.

The force of my arguments about past responsibility or future fear is not essentially one of grounding altruism or appropriate self - interest, which I would ground in the metaphysical claim that all humans have the same essence which constitutes their unity as a class called by Kant the kingdom of ends.