Sentences with phrase «same claims we do»

And we believe the same claims do exist,» said Charles Wright with Siskinds.

In addition, many of our competitors will make the same claims we do.

Not exact matches

And our government is claiming that it doesn't have enough money for infrastructure or for healthcare or for police or for education and at the same time, there's just huge amounts of tax avoidance and tax evasion going on through this secrecy world.

Mills may be an original, but he's certainly not the only one to have developed a «particular set of skills» over the course of a career — lots of people on LinkedIn claim to have done the exact same thing.

Volkswagen's Fun Theory claims its mission is to inspire people to do good — and smile at the same time.

Did it make any sense to treat claims about Clinton and Obama being literal, sulphur - smelling demons with the same kind of objectivity as allegations about email use?

«He's doing the same thing he tried at CN,» Finnson claims.

Don't let the illusion of perceived influence fool you into trusting a leader who isn't exactly everything she claims to be, and don't fall into the same trap yourself.

Among the professional reviewers, the sentiments are much the same, with a medical doctor from Dr. Lin Direct claiming that the gel «does not irritate the skin» even when used on sensitive faces.

The candidate claimed that by keeping interest rates at the same level, she is «doing political things» and «being more political than Secretary Clinton.»

The same source said that the family members «are all not pleased with the incident, but they have let Rob figure it out on his own,» and that they «really want nothing to do with» the situation, claiming that they «hated» Chyna.

The victim was not a public figure and claimed he did not know the escort, but Gawker published the story all the same to the dismay of sponsors and everyone else.

He claims that he can now get the same amount done in half the time.

It does, however, claim that its products «are made of the same, or even higher, quality than national brands.»

Although the BTC - e exchange shut down after the fine, tech website Coindesk noted in September that it appears to have been resurrected as a new exchange called WEX that claimed «that it did not receive any funds from BTC - e, while at the same time alleging that it would abide by anti-money laundering and know - your - customer laws.»

While the Post did not track false or misleading claims by Obama in the same way they have with Trump, in December the New York Times compared Trump's lies to Obama's and found that in their first 10 months of office, Trump told «nearly six times as many falsehoods as Obama did during his entire presidency.»

It has claimed it won't give US and Canadian users second tier status where their privacy is concerned — saying they're getting the same «settings and controls» — but unless or until US lawmakers spill some ink of their own there's nothing but an embarrassing PR message to regulate what Facebook chooses to do with Americans» data.

However, consumers apparently like using their smart speaker voice assistants for these tasks as 52 % claim to use timers at least monthly and 48 % report doing the same for alarms.

Did you also notice that if you take DoF numbers and run them for the same 7 years that Mintz runs his 30 billion for 100,00 jobs claim that it works out to 31.8 billion in lost revenue.

He told the audience that if they want to do something to help journalists, they should support blog TechDirt and its founder Mike Masnick, who is being sued by the same lawyer who led Hogan's lawsuit against Gawker over stories TechDirt published about Shiva Ayyadurai, who claims to have invented email.

You and Topher are doing the same thing: you claim that the Bible is absolute truth, but then claim that the problem area are because humans wrote it and got the details wrong.

The situation is not the same, and I'm not claiming another 07 - 08 will happen, but it doesn't look sustainable to me.

This is what helps you to understand that the account is the truth, that when you claim «nothing» can do the impossible, and then claim God can't do something relatively insignificant compared to that, then you are being very biased against God, and giving incredible amounts of credit to «nothing» at the same time... that is unrealistic in the extreme.

As such it would seem that you are either claiming Jesus doesn't support the Bible or you are being disingenuous by claiming that Jesus did not speak those words but did support the same concept.

Paul claimed to James that he is observant and NOT teaching Jews otherwise; to prove it, he agrees to go through a Nazarite ritual and pay for four other men to do the same (it was expensive).

Funny how IDers don't claim to be creationists, yet both have the EXACT same language and interpretation of evolutionary theory verbatim, go to the same church, watch the same videos, use the same arguments, vote for the same leaders, listen to the same pastors, and quote the same scripture, etc...

@Chad — Many «atheists» won't answer believers for the same reason Professor Dawkins doesn't debate creationists... it's a waste of time and it lends implicit validity to their claims.

Most of the righteous people I see are agnostics and atheists; most of the unrighteous people I see are those who claim their god is going to punish and burn people who don't have the same non-provable OPINIONS as they do.

Just as you have pulled up articles claiming that they are not one in the same God, I, too, can do the same — Except with information stating the opposite.

The simple truth is that the US is going through a development cycle that many other countries, some who claim the same god as you do, have gone through before.

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

And that had absolutely nothing to do with his post about applying the same rigors of evidence that you would apply to a number of other claims.

Considering that story wasnt even created until a few hundred years after the supposed «ressurection», and the fact that the story exists only in your fable book (also compiled, and edited hundreds of years later), I do nt think claiming it to be true is the same as, you know, being true.

Like the good Dr. has pointed out, using your book to refute someone elses book when both have the same historical significance, outlandish claims and religion is probably the dumbest thing you can do.

blessed are the cheesemakers «Claiming to «know» something you don't know is the same as lying.»

However I don't go around claiming it's absolute fact, that would be the same as lying.

Most Christians don't understand how others might see it as hate when they make the claim that their heaven & heII exists and that those not invited to heaven are going to go to heII to be tormented and tortured for eternity and the only way to salvation is to accept their God as your Lord and Savior... They think to themselves that they are just trying to help by condemning those they dislike and who don't worship the same way they do, but that doesn't change it from what it is, «hate filled».

Before you suggested I either believed in your god or don't so why should I claim is an evil monster and therefore should not make comments about same, is that correct?

My point to Steve was to point out that we do come to different conclusions using the same scripture therefore neither of us can claim scriptural authority.

So when David claims that he can be a hammer and a nail at the same time, either he is dishonest, he is nuts, or I just don't know what he means by «hammer» and «nail».

Why do Atheists claim to be «Free thinkers» while repeating the same lies that someone else told them?

We couldn't, and the same people who raise the objection that we can't know what was in the originals because we don't have them, would be claiming we can't know they are really the originals if we did claim to have them.

It's not that they can't substantiate their position, but rather that, rationally, they don't try to make the same mistake as many theists in making absolute claims.

The same claim is made on the lives of all who dare to answer as he did: «You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.»

I accept his claim to being Christian on the same basis as I do yours.

But it didn't actuallly get crazy until later that SAME day we were watching TV and heard the news of Morgan Freeman's granddaughter E'Dena Hines being fatally stabbed to death in an insane exorcisim where her boyfriend had apparently claimed she was a demon.

Christians are then left pointing to sociological maladies to vindicate our claims or appealing to the authority of a «pure science» which doesn't exist; or in the case of «same sex marriage,» we're reduced to pleading for private exemptions from public «justice.»

I don't understand how anyone in their right mind can claim that Christians, Jews and Muslims do not worship the same God.

The Fund intervened on behalf of Embassy Church, saying that the claim doesn't add up, due to many other secular businesses and organizations receiving the same or similar tax treatment.

It's the same movement that has created an untold number of click - bait stories about celebrities who do not claim, or even have interest in, Christianity.