Sentences with phrase «same degree of warming»

«Now we're seeing the same degree of warming happen possibly over a century or two,» says Ross Secord, and assistant professor of Earth and atmospheric sciences at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln.

Not exact matches

While it doesn't warm towels up to the same degree of heat as its higher - priced competition, this device makes up for it with a sleek design and exceptional price tag.

The research shows that a one degree rise in tropical temperature leads to around two billion extra tonnes of carbon being released per year into the atmosphere from tropical ecosystems, compared with the same tropical warming in the 1960s and 1970s.

The same contortions of the polar vortex that blasted more than half of the U.S. allowed unusual warmth to spread north to Alaska, which was 14 degrees Fahrenheit warmer in January than the long - term average.

The second simulation overlaid that same weather data with a «pseudo global warming» technique using an accepted scenario that assumes a 2 - to 3 - degree increase in average temperature, and a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide.

They argue that there is something wrong with a world in which carbon - dioxide levels are kept to 450 parts per million (a trajectory widely deemed compatible with a 2 degree cap on warming) but at the same time more than a billion of the poorest people are left without electricity, as in one much discussed scenario from the International Energy Agency.

The public, press and policy makers have been repeatedly told that three claims have widespread scientific support: Global temperature has risen about a degree since the late 19th century; levels of CO2 in the atmosphere have increased by about 30 % over the same period; and CO2 should contribute to future warming.

Do you apply the same degree of criticism to authors who use local warming to argue for global warming?

The public, press and policy makers have been repeatedly told that three claims have widespread scientific support: Global temperature has risen about a degree since the late 19th century; levels of CO2 [carbon dioxide] in the atmosphere have increased by about 30 percent over the same period; and CO2 should contribute to future warming.

Eating this way is also more appropriate in warmer climates, and during warm seasons, where animal foods aren't required to the same degree to maintain the natural heat of the body.

I wore this American Eagle dress with yet another neckerchief on Canada Day when it was sunny and warm and here we are 3.5 months later and 20 degrees cooler in the same dress; all it needed was a little bit of layering!

Eastern European women in general are educated, intelligent, and sophisticated (65 % of people there have college or university degrees), but at the same time they are warm, playful, feminine, and down - to - earth.

All of these temperatures are well below what we consider to be too warm (95 degrees), as well as the original Helix, which hit 102 degrees under the same conditions.

The details differ (mostly within the uncertainty bounds given by Mann et al, so the difference is not significant), but all published reconstructions share the same basic features: they show relatively warm medieval times, a cooling by a few tenths of a degree Celsius after that, and a rapid warming since the 19th Century.

Still if current human contributions have created almost a degree of warming to date, that box might create about half a degree of warming compared to a second box filled with air, floor covered with the same pans of water.

At the same time, there are particular areas of uncertainty, or of lower precision, that give rise to some ranges and degrees (within limits) of uncertainty when it comes to making forecasts of the degree of warming.

Even if climate sensitivity is somewhat less than the IPCC's median value of about 3 degrees Celsius, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are increasing exponentially, so a smaller value merely buys an extra decade or two until the same amount of warming is reached.

The main problem I have with Michaels is while he reasonably points out the limitations of climate models for forecasting the next one hundred years, he then confidently makes his own forecast of warming continuing at the same rate as for the last thirty years, leading to a 2 degree increase in global temperature.

Christy and McNider found the rate of warming has been 0.096 degrees Celsius per decade after «the removal of volcanic cooling in the early part of the record,» which «is essentially the same value we determined in 1994... using only 15 years of data.»

In May, Royal Dutch Shell responded to shareowner concerns on the issue, and adopted the same position as Exxon: «there is a high degree of confidence that global warming will exceed 2 °C by the end of the 21st century,» the company stated.

Assuming the same climate sensitivity, Lindzen's estimate of a 2.5 °C drop for a -30 W / m2 forcing would imply that currently doubling CO2 would warm the planet by only a third of a degree at equilibrium, which is well outside the bounds of IPCC estimates and even very low by most skeptical standards.

In a separate trend analysis of winter temperatures (Oct - Apr), we found that temperatures in the months of March and April in the last 25 years, 1988 — 2012, were significantly warmer by 2 and 1 degrees Celsius (3.5 and 2 degrees Fahrenheit), respectively, than temperatures for the same months in the 25 years when the experiments were conducted, 1958 — 1982 (see File S4 for more detailed information).

Jim D, if one place has a 3 - sigma summer several degrees warmer than average, it must mean that another place or places are cooler, or the same place is cooler some other time of the year, if the global average has only increased by a fraction of a degree.

Land warming is proceeding too (0.3 degrees per decade for the last three) as a result of this same forcing.

A generally accepted answer is that a doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (it turns out that one gets the same value for a doubling regardless of what value one starts from) would perturb the energy balance of Earth about 2 percent, and this would produce about 2 degrees Fahrenheit warming in the absence of feedbacks.

George E. Smith (16:11:36): «''» A generally accepted answer is that a doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (it turns out that one gets the same value for a doubling regardless of what value one starts from) would perturb the energy balance of Earth about 2 percent, and this would produce about 2 degrees Fahrenheit warming in the absence of feedbacks.

The SDS has the same emissions profile as the IEA's Copenhagen - era 450 Scenario (450S), which gives only a 50 percent chance of keeping warming below 2 degrees Celsius (Figure ES - 3).

But simultaneous land ‐ based measurements (HadCRUT3) show a warming of 0.2 degrees Celsius for that same period.

A given location on the equator of Venus cools by about 5 degrees during its 4 - month - long night, and so Venus could have cooled right down if the Sun were not shining during its daytime and warming the troposphere and the surface back up again by the same 5 degrees, or whatever it is.

Global temperature has risen about a degree since the late 19th century; levels of CO2 in the atmosphere have increased by about 30 % over the same period; and CO2 should contribute to future warming.

Meanwhile, fewer than a dozen small ice shelves floating on «warm» waters (seawater only a few degrees above the freezing point) produced half of the total melt water during the same period.

Belief in global warming is a cultural marker, an aspect of the same vapid credentialism that gives leftists the vapors when someone who doesn't have an Ivy League degree considers running for President.

What is found is a degree of «shift» of the input data of roughly the same order of scale as the reputed Global Warming.

However, the amount of warming caused by human greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is known to a high degree of certainty, and these same studies have all found that GHGs are responsible for over 100 % of the observed warming over this timeframe (Figure 3).

The public, press and policy makers have been repeatedly told that three claims have widespread scientific support: Global temperature has risen about a degree since the late 19th century; levels of CO2 in the atmosphere have increased by about 30 % over the same period; and CO2 should contribute to future warming.

It seems obvious that one should list the factors and degree of cooling for each and do the same for those that warm.

The public, press and policy makers have been repeatedly told that three claims have widespread scientific support: Global temperature has risen about a degree since the late 19th century; levels of CO2 [carbon dioxide] in the atmosphere have increased by about 30 percent over the same period; and CO2 should contribute to future warming.

If you want to replace the hypothesis you have to have a better explanation because throwing it out leaves you with mysteries like how the earth escaped any of its past Ice Ages, for which you would have no mechanism that fits the evidence, and how we had a degree of warming just at the same time as the CO2 rose by 40 %, which is a demo of the hypothesis if you ever needed one.

And the two plateaus are not t the same level: The current one is a third of degree Celsius higher than the earlier one on the left was.It got that way because in 1999, immediately after the super El Nino left, there was a quick but intense step warming.

However, the onset, magnitude (from a few tenths to a few degrees centigrade) and rate of warming varies regionally, and not all sites in a given region show the same trend (Osterkamp and Romanovsky, 1999).

Reducing carbon emissions to ensure a 66 % chance of staying below 2 degrees Celsius of warming would be a great challenge even if every country were to accept to reduce its current emissions at the same rate.

Carbon and oxygen isotope ratios both shift at the same boundary; the former shows disruption of the carbon cycle, while the latter shows an abrupt warming of about 6 degrees.

«Snyder said if climate factors are the same as in the past — and that's a big if,» AP noted, «Earth is already committed to another 7 degrees or so (about 4 degrees Celsius) of warming over the next few thousand years.»

Scarcely any sleighing, muddy roads, some fog, only five days... below zero,... and a mean temperature ten degrees warmer than any winter of which I have any record... The almost entire absence of snow has been somewhat detrimental to business generally and has proved a serious drawback to logging... The winter certainly has been a pleasant and comfortable one, making small demands on the fuel pile... While the mean temperature of the month was about the same as February of last year, it was in some respects less pleasant.

At the same time the radar map loop was recorded, the temperatures in Morgantown were from +35 to +41 degrees (shown in the screenshot below), why was the rain from a warm flow of southerly moisture suddenly «changing over to snow?

Based on their analysis, the same magnitude of forcing (in W / m2) for solar and CO2, gives a * different * warming (ca. 1.5 vs 0.5 degrees).

That's much warmer than the Tecra Z40's top temp of about 93 degrees under the same testing conditions.