Sentences with phrase «same dividend and interest»

Non-Direct recognition means that MassMutual continues to pay the same dividend and interest on the cash value in your policy, even if the cash is being used as collateral for a life insurance loan.

What you really had were a bunch of holdings that were all correlated to the same set of circumstances — a prolonged period of low interest rates and investors piling into the same dividend and interest - paying securities.

Not exact matches

The low interest rates that the Federal Reserve relied on to kick - start the economy, meanwhile, fed this same dynamic, making it easier for fast - growing companies to borrow money to grow further — and making bond interest look unattractive compared with stock dividends.

At the same time, the deficit in the country's current account — the imbalance in the trading of goods and services as well as the shortfall in all other cross-border payments from interest income and rents to dividends and profits on direct investments — underwent its fastest ever quarterly deterioration.

Interest and dividends from this Fund have provided $ 320 million to Utah schools over that same period.

You report dividends on Schedule B in the same way as interest, but instead, you transfer the payor information and the total ordinary dividend payments reported in box 1a from each 1099 - DIV you receive.

Rather, the policy acts as a forced savings plan that accumulates money in a tax deferred account that you can THEN use to invest with, as you purchase other income producing assets, at the same time as earning interest and dividends on the cash value in your policy!

The short answer is no, the same rules exist for short - and long - term capital gains, qualified and ordinary dividends, and interest income.

The TAVF approach is the same as that followed by private companies not seeking access to public markets for equities; businessmen seeking favorable tax attributes so that they can create wealth on a tax - sheltered basis; most creditors; and all investors who seek in the management of their own portfolios to maximize total return, rather than just invest for interest income and dividend income.

The power of compounding can make an investment grow much faster than would otherwise have been the case, and is obviously based on the assumption that interest or dividends are reinvested in the same asset... More compelling proof that the odds are stacked against the capital - growth - only brigade is gleaned from an analysis of the components of the total return figures.

Our illustration assumes a 4 % dividend (same as the interest for Investor A) with a modest 3 % annual increase in the dividend and stock price.

The cash in your account is still earning guaranteed interest and dividends, while at the same time, earning a return in the cash flow asset you used the loan to purchase.

Quicken reported that I have an account value of $ 90,985.79 the same as IB's reported NAV after accounting for interest and dividend accruals of - $ 41.41.

Due to changes in interest rates, the investors may not be able to reinvest their money and receive the same dividend rate.

That's because the dividends and interest income are reinvested and even if you consider it as contributions, in the previous row they should be counted as withdrawals on the same day.

It is a question with no right or wrong answer because a number of variables (interest rates applicable till the mortgage is paid down, annual returns from a diversified portfolio during the same period, future tax rates on income, interest, dividends and capital gains, the annual churn in a portfolio etc.) are unknown at this point.

Back when dividend yields were higher, and corporate bond yields were higher, both absolute and relative yield managers flourished as interest rates and dividend yields crested in the early 1980s, and the stocks paying high dividends got bid up as interest rates fell, much as the same thing happened to zero coupon and other noncallable long duration bonds.

Now I'm deciding on one more and am considering some of the same ones as U. PEP — Hard to go wrong w / this but debt is a bit of a concern (interest coverage ratio is good though) INTC — Good yield, payout ratio and attractive valuation BUT I'm leary of tech as income stocks and the dividend growth is fueled too much by a previously low payout ratio instead of revenue / earnings.

Among these requirements are the following: (i) at least 90 % of the fund's gross income each taxable year must be derived from dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans, and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock, securities or foreign currencies, or other income derived with respect to its business of investing in such stock or securities or currencies and net income derived from an interest in a qualified publicly traded partnership; (ii) at the close of each quarter of the fund's taxable year, at least 50 % of the value of its total assets must be represented by cash and cash items, U.S. Government securities, securities of other RICs and other securities, with such other securities limited, in respect of any one issuer, to an amount that does not exceed 5 % of the value of a Fund's assets and that does not represent more than 10 % of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer; and (iii) at the close of each quarter of the fund's taxable year, not more than 25 % of the value of its assets may be invested in securities (other than U.S. Government securities or the securities of other RICs) of any one issuer or of two or more issuers and which are engaged in the same, similar, or related trades or businesses if the fund owns at least 20 % of the voting power of such issuers, or the securities of one or more qualified publicly traded partnerships.

Your home isn't an asset in the same way that a stock is one and the mortgage interest deduction isn't the same as a dividend.