Sentences with phrase «same dividend per share»

In the case of Ford, for example, there are 70 million shares of Class B stock which receive the same dividend per share as do the common stock holders.

If they should maintain the same dividend per share they usually pay their shareholders, this means a better returns if you invest in the stocks.

If they should maintain the same dividend per share they usually pay their shareholders, this means a better returns if you invest in the stocks.

Not exact matches

At the same time, Canadian Tire Corp. has a valuation of $ 11.5 billion and earns $ 10 a share — and pays a dividend yield of 2.14 per cent.

This means that with the purchase of stock must come the same economic rights, such as receiving dividends or compensation in the event of liquidation at the same time and in the same amount per share as all other shareholders.

The group chairman, Jose Vinals, said in the same statement that the board «understands the importance of the ordinary dividend to shareholders and intends to increase the full year dividend per share over time.»

Consider that the exact same $ 3 per share dividend would be a 6 % dividend yield if the stock were trading at $ 50 per share instead.

But in early 2016 Wesfarmers had a great history of building wealth for shareholders — an investment in the company's shares in 2000 returned nearly 17 % per year while the Australian market, including dividends, returned 8 % a year over the same period.

Thanks to STORE's skilled use of long - term fixed rate debt, the net cash spread (cash yield minus cost of capital) generally stays the same, allowing for profitable growth of AFFO per share and thus the dividend.

The panel said it was «strongly of the view that unacceptable circumstances had occurred» after Saputo raised its bid to $ 9.20 a share, while at the same time WCB withdrew the payment of special dividends if the Canadian company's stake reached more than 50 per cent.

But in early 2016 Wesfarmers had a great history of building wealth for shareholders — an investment in the company's shares in 2000 returned nearly 17 % per year while the Australian market, including dividends, returned 8 % a year over the same period.

The next day at the opening of trading that same 100 shares of stock is priced at $ 0.99 per share to account for the one cent dividend paid the previous afternoon.

If the dividends per share were reinvested and remained constant while the stock price never recovered and stayed 20 % below its purchase price, this seemingly unfortunate investment would eventually become more profitable after 18.9 years (red highlight, intersection point between 5 % dividend yield and 20 % price decline) than if those same dividends were reinvested and the stock price had remained the same throughout the period.

• Each remaining share represents a bigger slice of the whole company; • That helps increase earnings per share; and • It is easier for the company to grow its dividend per share, because the same pool of money needs to be paid out to fewer shares.

If these companies continue these policies at the same rates and continue to earn 10 % of their value during Year 2, investors holding shares of ABC will see even greater dividend payouts, earning $ 10.50 per share ($ 1.05 B x 10 % = $ 105M, $ 105M / 2 = $ 52.5 M, $ 52.5 M / 5M = $ 10.50) at the end of Year 2 for a dividend yield of 10.5 %.

I would assume that the total payout is then 0.26 per share However, on Yahoo finance the dividend amount on the same date is 0.25.

The company's shares have fallen 22 % over the last 12 months and its quarterly dividend has crumbled from $ 0.065 US per share to $ 0.038 US per share over the same period.

Alternatively, you can achieve the same result by dividing the dividends per share by the company's earnings per share.

When reinvesting dividends, you'll pay a transaction fee of $ 3 and the same commission of 5 cents per share.

The current per share dividend payout is about the same per share as 1998.