Sentences with phrase «same effect over time»

Not exact matches

The same effect could have been achieved by temporary employment, as the Bible itself stipulates for Israelites (Lev 25:39)» @Chad «LOL you have ZERO understanding of the practice at the time, over 30 % of the Roman population was slaves.

Either they necessitate a deceptive «God», e.g. creating starlight «in transit» which means that for some light the star that supposedly sent said light would never have actually existed, or they would cause effect that should be evident but are not, e.g. temporarily fast starlight would effectively cook many things, such as life on earth, if the required light (and attendant gamma radiation) were compressed into a significantly shorter time frame (think of the radiation from the apparent 13 billion years of the universe arriving at the same time, or even over a 1000 years).

Finding a way to reconcile two competing demands - minimizing contact in practice in order to reduce the number of concussions sustained and the number of hits players sustain over the course of a week and a season that emerging science, now more than ever, suggests may have a deleterious cumulative effect [26] on a player's cognitive function over the long term, while at the same time maximizing the amount of time in practice learning how to tackle and block without head - to - head contact - time that is needed to maximize the protective effect of proper tackling on the number of head - to - head hits players sustain in game action, which can not only result in concussion, but catastrophic neck and spine injuries - is challenging, but clearly not impossible.

(2) The audio - visual effects of the lights feature are great, but seem to be overwhelming to the baby (and adults as well) with too many lights flickering on and off at the same time and over stimulating the baby.

When the Saxbe fix was used for Hillary Clinton, who had the same problem, there was some debate over whether it would be valid, due to the timing of when the raise by the Executive Branch took effect compared to exactly when Clinton resigned from the Senate and when her term of service began at the State Dept.. The Constitutionality has nothing whatsoever to do with Clinton's personal actions and these particulars would hold for others too if the timing was similar.

When analyzed together with the aerosol loading over the same area at the same time, the outcome, says Koren, was a «textbook demonstration of the invigoration effect» of added aerosols on clouds.

However, individuals do not imitate one another constantly or at the same intensity over time, which has the effect of increasing the complexity of collective behaviors.

In effect, all the energy the black hole sees over the lifetime of the universe hits the Cauchy horizon at the same time, blasting into oblivion any observer who gets that far.

«In the future, we will need to carry out studies of the same individuals over an extended period of time to determine cause - and - effect relationships between biological age and sleep disorders.»

It is especially important to take account of cocktail effects because people are exposed to many types of endocrine disruptors at the same time over the course of a normal day,» Julie Boberg explains.

What we are developing now are a really unique set of tools that are going to allow us to monitor the changes in the retina at the cellular scale over time in the same person; and we think that this is really going to have a transformative effect because it's not only very powerful from the statistical point of view but it really is going to allow us to do experiments that were not possible before.

Longitudinal mixed models were also used to estimate the effect of vaccine dose on mean log - transformed antibody levels over time, using a spatial exponential covariance structure to model the correlation between measurements from the same individual while taking into account the number of study days between measurements.

When you get big hits of wow — from buying a new pair of shoes, for example, or eating crème brûlée — the brain releases the reward chemical dopamine, but over time you need more and more of those hits to get the same effect, explains Robert Lustig, MD, author of the forthcoming book The Hacking of the American Mind: The Science Behind the Corporate Takeover of Our Bodies and Brains.

At the same time, I can honestly say I'm probably more stressed and sleep deprived now as a mom of six than I was in college and over the last few years I have researched and evaluated several natural types of nootropics for their effect on cognitive performance (without the negative side effects of smart drugs).

To get the same emotional effect you will have to increase your sweet intake over time.

RECENT STUDY ON ADVERSE EFFECTS OF LOW SODIUM INTAKE About the same time that U.S. health officials announced their new initiative to reduce salt intake, The Lancet published a large population - based study which showed persuasively that the risk of mortality and serious cardiovascular events increases significantly when salt intake drops below 3000 mg per day (two - thirds teaspoon) in an adult of average weight.3 The study also found that sodium intake in excess of seven grams per day (over three teaspoons salt) was associated with an increased risk in those with hypertension, but not in those without hypertension.

The ratio of fat, sugar, and salt in processed foods cause a near - constant release of positive chemicals that over time need more input for the same effect, leading to higher rates of consumption.

Over 8 biweekly blood tests we had noticed that every time I fasted 20/4 (20 hours water only and 4 hours of feeding window) my bloodwork showed improvements but when I went for vacation and dropped IF as low as 12/12 (12 hours fasting and 12 hours eating) my blood work did not show the same effect.

At the same time, a number of scientists and writers have issued warnings53 about the adverse effects of soy, citing both the scientific literature dating back over 60 years as well as recently published studies.

Its Groundhog Day style time traveling mechanics still feel fresh, and with the same three days reoccurring over and over, there's significant replay value through its Butterfly Effect variations.

Using the same actors over that time span allows for an authenticity of experience in a narrative feature not seen before, the effect of which is to invest even the smallest, most mundane of moments with a profound, revelatory, nature.

«My mixed - method, longitudinal approach will enable me to explore cause and effect in the lives of the same individuals and families over time.»

These are effects that could accumulate over time if the same students are repeatedly exposed to troubled peers.

Moreover, genetic influences need not have the same effect on test scores throughout the lifecycle, since any genetic effects may be amplified over time if they also affect the environmental influences that people seek out for themselves.

The disc contains footage of President Forrester's assassination, the same video that has been broadcast countless times on TV and over the internet - with one crucial, shocking difference: This version shows that before the video was released, it was altered with sinister special effects.

You've got to account for the US$ fluctuations — sure S&P was up, but US$ / C$ was down 13 % over the same time — so from a Canadian perspective the net effect of US markets was only a ~ 13 % rise.

(This ignores the effect of investment growth, but if you would have saved the # 60 in an ISA, the end result is the same: if you had growth of say 50 % over the time the money was in your pension, it'll be the same effect if you had # 100 growing to # 150 and now received 60 % of it, or if you had # 60 growing to # 90 untaxed in an ISA.)

When you make an investment, and it earns interest or gains over a period of time, in effect that final amount of money (principal + interest) has the same value as the principal when you started, because that final amount was grown from the original principal.

This seems odd as both ETFs in theory did exactly the same thing; and while 0.5 % doesn't sound like much, when the effect is compounded over time the difference really adds up.

I am unsure if paying a big chunk at once has the same effect as paying more over time.

A material part of earnings is reinvested in the business so that over time there is a compounding effect, much the same as happens in a saving account if you reinvest the interest.

These types of loans can result in significant savings as long as the person does not default on any payments for the loan as the interest rate will remain the same over the entire time the loan agreement is in effect.

Some post-downtime wonkyness is expected, too: «We expect that there will be some minor stats issues right after the downtime when all the players are getting back online at the same time; this effect will diminish over the following 2 hours.»

Its Groundhog Day style time traveling mechanics still feel fresh, and with the same three days reoccurring over and over, there's significant replay value through its Butterfly Effect variations.

Ferdinand, I started having a look at the relevant papers, and noticed a couple of things: Soden was a co-author of the 2002 Wielicki paper you cite, in 2002 Soden was lead author of yet another paper in Science, this one focused on the effects of the Pinatubo eruption, Wielicki and Wong (also an author of the 2002 Wielicki paper) were in turn co-authors of a 2003 IEEE paper debunking the iris effect, and... how in the world can so many scientists, many of them frequent collaborators, screw up something this fundamental over such a long period of time and have most of it get through peer review in the same prestigious publication?

There are however statistical reasons why 1975 is a break point — breaking the trend there provides a substantially better fit over the whole record (not true for Aug 1997), and if you look at when anthropogenic effects came out of the «noise» of global temperatures, it is about the same time (fig 9.5 WG1 AR4).

In order to show that there is little effect on surface temperature anomalies due to station siting, they need to assess the anomalies over time in the same region for each category of station siting.

Then, instead of throwing out the data as hopelessly compromised and starting the experiment over with these factors corrected, you (a) do a study estimating how miscalibrated, how defective and how improperly located your instruments were and apply adjustments to all past data to «correct» the improper reading, (b) you do a study to estimate the effect of the external factors at the time you discover the problem and apply adjustments to all past data to «correct» the effects of the external factors even though you have no idea what the effect of the external factor actually was for a given instrument at the time the data was recorded, because you only measured the effect years later and then at only some locations, (c) you «fill in» any missing data using data from other instruments and / or from other measurements by the same instrument, (d) you do another study to determine how best to deal with measurements from different instruments over different time periods and at different locations and apply adjustments to all past data to «correct» for differences between readings from different instruments over different time periods at different locations.

The biggest problem with «writing off solar effects on climate as insignificant», at the same time attributing most of the recent changes to AGW, is that it does not appear to stand up over the longer term.

The methods used by the interest groups trying to discredit or misrepresent the science on climate are the same methods (refined over time) that were used by the tobacco industry to discredit the science on the health effects of tobacco.

Large areas of wetlands have been drained over the same time period, presumably offsetting the claimed cooling effect.

Over time, even a very small cyclical forcing will have a large effect if any of the systems on earth resonant at the same frequency.

Meanwhile, the logarithmic effect of CO2 is excellent «concession» to make in the rhetorical sense, since it concedes the obvious state of our knowledge about the effects of CO2, while at the same time providing us with the solid argument that even if we double atmospheric CO2 levels from 400ppm to 800 ppm over the next 100 years the largest amount of warming possible — assuming all else remains the same and Gaia has no homeostasis negative feedback systems which tend to moderate any runaway trends — is 1.2 c.

Gazing at the same modelling printouts, Treasury wrote that the economic effects of all scenarios considered «are small compared with the ongoing growth in GDP and GNI per person over time» (p. 72).

Even if the earth's temperature had stayed the same or even decreased slighty over this time, ask yourself this: given what we know about the greenhouse effect and the levels of CO2 gases the world is creating, would you not be concerned that if we continue at the current rate, things are gonna get a hotter, eventually?

If you will take the trouble to go over what has been written on this thread, and sort out my posts, I think you will see that I have demonstrated, by simple science and logic, that if there is a rational discussion of what is happening to Antarctic sea ice at the same time as Arctic sea ic is discussed, the only conclusion one can come to is that whatever is happening in the Arctic this year, it is purely a regional effect.

Halting the production of marine biota C and maintaining the same fluxes of C out of marine biota, the marine biota C would be used up in about 3 weeks, at which point a 0.0022 % / year ** drawdown of O2 could persist for some longer time (** the actual removal of O2 from the atmosphere via oxidation in the deeper ocean may occur over a timescale of 1000 years, but the oxydation of organic C in the ocean might be completed over a significantly shorter time, so the actual removal of O2 from the atmosphere may be slower than 0.0022 % / year)-- but it still wouldn't have much total effect on the amount of atmospheric O2.

Think of it this way — if there is no chance of observing the effects of changes in PDI in the global impacts record for 50 years (Emanuel's estimate) and over that same time period we expect damage to increase in real terms by up to a factor of 32 (a real doubling in damages every 10 - 15 years), then I think that it is safe (and also responsible) to assert that over that time period the only policies that can have a discernable effect on tropical cyclone damage around the world will necessarily be adaptive.

The effect of a sustained release of CH4 has the same GWP as that of a sustained release of 81 times the amount of CO2 over a time of 20 years.The factors for 50,100,250 and 500 years are 57,39,21, and 13.

For example, the direct radiative effect of a mass of methane is about 84 times stronger than the same mass of carbon dioxide over a 20 - year time frame [22] but it is present in much smaller concentrations so that its total direct radiative effect is smaller, in part due to its shorter atmospheric lifetime.