Not exact matches
The lesson
effectiveness ratings were virtually the
same between the LLMT and MMC groups.
Our goals remain the
same: increased
rates of proficiency on state and national assessments, decreased achievement gaps, improved teacher
effectiveness, increased graduation
rates, and higher
rates of college enrollment and success.
However, on a positive note, the school
effectiveness rating had increased from 8.4 to 9.8 during the
same time, with this increase primarily due to teachers» perceptions of building collaboration and parent partnerships growing further in the positive direction in Year 2 than they had in Year 1.
Where several alternative programs are available that address the
same educational outcome, for example, increasing the
rate of high school completion, we combine program costs with
effectiveness data in cost -
effectiveness analyses.
This means that two teachers with nearly the
same number of points might end up receiving different
effectiveness ratings.
This phenomenon would be expected to act synergistically to enhance teacher quality over time, as lower
rates of attrition particularly would tend to increase the experience level and overall
effectiveness of the teaching force, especially in large urban districts, and save funds on teacher training at the
same time.