You are critical of the Parliament and Council for lacking «courage» and you suggest that the Directive should have been «more ambitious» and extended protection beyond the ECtHR, such as by extending
the same fair trial guarantees to legal persons as are granted to natural persons.
«I only wish the animals on Anacapa could have gotten
the same fair trial I did,» he said.
Not exact matches
«How do you pick 12 who can be
fair when you have two leaders on
trial for much the
same thing in the
same place?»
Its a subtle new mode that changes the experience, but at the
same time makes the game more
fair, less
trial and error when it comes to weapon choices.
(Order, p. 30, citing Hudson v. Louisiana, 450 U.S. 40, 44 (1981)-RRB- In Hudson the court also held that «a reversal due to failure of proof at
trial, where the State received a
fair opportunity to offer whatever proof it could assemble, bars retrial on the
same charge.»
That said, I would venture that
trial fairness should operate as the guiding principle in this area, so if the plaintiff has decided that expert evidence from one specialty based on an examination of the plaintiff is relevant to the adjudication of her claim at
trial, courts should be loathe to deny the defence a
fair opportunity to respond with expert evidence from the
same specialty based on an assessment of the plaintiff.
The wry judicial litotes balanced against the desperation of the layman facing the
same dense statutory provisions might lead the independent bystander to doubt the chances of a
fair trial.