Sentences with phrase «same false claim»

McIntyre and McKitrick (2005), in a paper they have managed to slip through the imperfect peer - review filter of GRL, now simply recycle the very same false claims made by them previously in their comment on MBH98 that was rejected by Nature.

Not exact matches

Yelp hasn't commented on the third lawsuit, but in a blog post March 4 headlined «Different Day, Different Lawyer, Same Meritless Claim: A Classic Race to the Courthouse,» the company's co-founder and CEO Jeremy Stoppelman called the two suits filed so far «frivolous» and said the allegations «are false and easily refuted.»

While the Post did not track false or misleading claims by Obama in the same way they have with Trump, in December the New York Times compared Trump's lies to Obama's and found that in their first 10 months of office, Trump told «nearly six times as many falsehoods as Obama did during his entire presidency.»

You claim one is false, while using the other to survive, and both are the same thing

You claim that the quantum mechanics that resulted in our universe are false, while the exact same quantum mechanics that let your computer operate are true.

(Hence the quotes) Not only is such a declaration false... this poster has made the exact same claim in the past and been corrected, thus revealing an intent to deceive.

I applaud him for standing by his faith, but it's as false to claim that they're the same.

My point is pretty much the same as Sven2547, that any non-inclusive religion can claim that it's adherents are being tempted to believe a false religion.

Such teaching is also based on much false witness, such as the claim that being gay and being a pedophile are one and the same thing.

Reality, just like you Pharisees (Zionist Jews of today) of those days made false claims against Jesus to have him crucified, you did the same to Paul.

Critics claim that it is high because doctors make money from C - sections (false, most obstetricians get paid the same amount regardless of how the baby is delivered) or because it is more convenient for obstetricians (false, nothing is more convenient than every patient having an uncomplicated vaginal delivery).

Baby Milk Action has asked Mapa Spontex to provide further information on where it warns mothers of the possible negative effects on breast feeding of introducing bottle feeding and the difficulty of reversing the decision not to breastfeed as this was not found on its website, advertising or packaging, certainly not in the same location as the false claim that the First Choice teat is «clinically proven» for «optimal combination of breast and bottle feeding» nor alongside advise to introduce feeding bottles by 6 weeks of age at the latest.

Yet at the same time, parents who take their children for those recommended vaccinations might be inundated with Web site and celebrity - espoused rumors making false claims that shots are not necessary or cause autism.

I faintly recall seeing such a claim made on the so - called CO2Science site, which has been identified as the source for some of Monckton's other false claims, so if you're quoting it correctly (and in future an exact quote with a link so others can see the context would be much appreciated) it seems likely that this one came from the same place.

While Mike is often seen talking against the false claims made by supplement brands to promote their products, Phoenix Weight Loss Pills do the same to an extent.

Teachers claim that cameras in the classroom can help stamp out students» false allegations against them, providing an added level of protection for both their careers and personal integrity while at the same time affording parents full confidence in terms of how their children are being treated while at school.

Their false claims highlight the importance of remembering the facts in this case — the same facts that laid the ground for the landmark 2014 ruling in favor of the student plaintiffs and helped deliver a win for all of California's six million public school students.

Landsman has been told, by the same loose confederacy of physicians, psychologists, and his former spouse, that alcohol will kill his gift for recollection, but so far, to his regret, this claim has proved false.

First you make fun of Nintendo fans, then you say you ARE a Nintendo fan, while at the same time claiming Nintendo «barely has any games», which any actual fan of Nintendo knows is completely false rhetoric.

Finally, Victor's claim that solar levels in 1780 were at the same level as the end of the 1960s period is patently false.

It's also instructive to see how the self same people who get so het up about (false claims of) argument from authority arguing... from authority, becuase that's all this letter is.

If we're going to use agencies of the federal government to investigate and even prosecute «climate deniers», for making «false and misleading claims» then let's damn well do the same for «climate alarmists», who do the same thing all the time.

Some traditional media outlets responsibly reported the story, beginning with the British newspaper The Guardian; but it certainly hasn't received the same attention given to the earlier false claim that the science of climate change has been fabricated — a story that itself received far more attention when it initially broke than when it was completely and thoroughly (pdf) and beyond all doubt debunked as not only systemic lies, but lies promoted through what appears to have been criminal activity.

Dear me Richard, you seem to be displaying the same inability to misunderstand plain english as the deniers who made false claims about the CRU emails.

This particular false claim was in the same paragraph as Mann's false claim to have received a Nobel prize.

Note that Richard Tol's claim that this adjustment makes a large increase in the «dissensus rate» depends on the false assumption that the error rate and distribution for all rating values is the same.)

The same source will show that the second claim, that the turbines can't stand the Australian heat, is similarly quite false.

While emails and other forms of electronic communication present their own opportunities for false claims of authorship, the basic principles of authentication are the same.

Dismissal for lack of evidence or prosecutorial discretion is not the same as having a right recognized on the record that would enable you to win a claim for false arrest or other damages, get state laws struck down, etc. that would be able to be done if you had an actual right.

I work for a travel insurer who distributes product through several online sources and: * A traveler has the opportunity to read policy exclusions in the same way they would on a comparison site * All our products offer a free look period — it's the law not a comparison site selling advantage * We don't use false advertising to sell — unfair claim to make in such a broad way, especially when this article does just that.

Fraud Warning: If the Insured Person or any person acting on his / her behalf shall make any claim or statement knowing the same to be false or fraudulent as regards to an amount or otherwise, then this Insurance shall become void and all claims here under shall be forfeited without refund of premium.

In case the policy holder provides any false claims or facts, the insurance service provider has the right to terminate the policy and all premiums paid for the same will be forfeited.