Since there are some differences in the climate changes simulated by various models even if
the same forcing scenario is used, the models are compared to assess the uncertainties in the responses.
Not exact matches
But the
scenario is almost exactly the
same both times: The travelers head up the mountain trail and encounter a fierce storm that
forces them to either take shelter (as in The Hobbit) or turn back (as in The Fellowship of the Ring).
Meanwhile, it's the
same scenario with Redan as the Dutch youngster is attracting plenty of interest with Manchester City, United and RB Leipzig all keen, but Chelsea are trying to
force their way to the front of the queue, as per the Mirror.
The
same scenario has now played itself out in this case of Szczsney getting
forced out of Arsenal by Le Prof, for emotional reason maybe?
A study released last month in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres used three different models to run the
same SSCE
scenario in which sea - salt engineering was used in the low - latitude oceans to keep top - of - atmosphere radiative
forcing at the 2020 level for 50 years and was then abruptly turned off for 20 years.
Look at the difference between
Scenario B and C. Despite the large difference in
forcings in the later years, the long term trend over that
same period is similar.
Note that the old GISS model had a climate sensitivity that was a little higher (4.2 ºC for a doubling of CO2) than the best estimate (~ 3ºC) and as stated in previous years, the actual
forcings that occurred are not the
same as those used in the different
scenarios.
With this attack, any phone that hears the noise (they have to specifically target iOS or Android) could be unknowingly
forced to visit a webpage that plays the noise, and thus infect other phones near it... In that
same scenario, the webpage could also silently download malware onto the device.
Forced to continually relive the
same scenario while in another man's skin, Colter thus becomes Bill Murray - by - way - of - Scott - Bakula - by - way - of - Hercule - Poirot, except that — because he's really traveling to the dead Sean's expiring recorded memory of the morning's events, dubbed a «Source Code» — his behavior during these trips has no direct ramifications on the future.
The story's parameters are the
same as in the previous book (the struggle between various
forces to decide Brittany's fate, the relationship between the young women trained in the deathly arts and the saint who directs them); and once again the tale is filled with vicious battles, heart - stopping escapes, and intricately devised
scenarios.
By creating a low - cost tablet and
forcing other vendors to do the
same, Google is creating a
scenario that gives Android its best chance of spreading in the ever - growing tablet market.
Scenarios A, B, and C are the
same model, but with different
forcings (different greenhouse gas emissions forecasts).
We've grown our vulnerability at a pace far exceeding whatever
forces climate change is exerting on the
same scenarios.
At the
same time, this
scenario is a good example of an initial
forcing.
Look at the difference between
Scenario B and C. Despite the large difference in
forcings in the later years, the long term trend over that
same period is similar.
Scenario C has the
same forcing until 2000 as
Scenario B, after which it is constant at 2000 levels.
Other
forcings, including the growth and decay of massive Northern Hemisphere continental ice sheets, changes in atmospheric dust, and changes in the ocean circulation, are not likely to have the
same kind of effect in a future warming
scenario as they did at glacial times.
In the
same way, a «greenhouse gas only»
scenario can not be verified by observed data, because the real climate system has evolved under both greenhouse gas and aerosol
forcing.
Therefore by the
same logic, B
scenario temperatures should have come close to those of A from ~ 2003 onwards, and until the next volcanic
forcing.
Price of CO2 per ton (2005 $) in the RCP4.5
scenario, and the alternative GCAM pathways with the
same radiative
forcing targets of RCPs 8.5, 6, and 2.6
There were three
scenarios for greenhouse gases, A, B and C, with B and C being nearly the
same until the year 2000, when greenhouse gases stopped increasing in
scenario C. Real - world
forcings have followed the B and C greenhouse
scenario almost exactly.
P.S. I felt it was «on - topic» to Mann's AGU presentation as I consider it misleading to refer to
Scenario B as what Hansen «expected» vs. what «happened» in terms of
forcing (without referring to the
same in a presentation).
The number of mitigation
scenarios leading to 6 W / m2 in the literature is relatively low (around 10)-- but at the
same time many baseline
scenarios (no climate policy) correspond to this
forcing level.
What Gavin has done as far as
scenarios are concerned is the
same as what Steve McIntyre has done; which is to contrast the
forcings of the three
scenarios, and identify the one closest to actuality.
The larger the MWP temperature rise in this
scenario, the larger the TCR, and the
same feedbacks both positive and negative will operate for solar and CO2
forcing.
Regarding the question above about committed climate warming: it's true that the traditional idea of «warming in the pipeline» comes from constant CO2 concentration
scenarios, i.e., one where the
forcing stays the
same.
Missing a premium payment in the future could void the guarantee, and you could be
forced to pay even higher premiums to keep your policy alive — the
same scenario as buying that very costly term policy.