Since the 5.7 - liter makes 71 horsepower more than the 4.6 - liter and gets almost
the same fuel mileage as the V6, the vast majority of Tundra buyers select the big engine, although the new 4.6 - liter V8 bests both the 4.0 - liter and 5.7 - liter in highway fuel economy.
Since the 5.7 - liter makes 71 horsepower more than the 4.6 - liter and gets almost
the same fuel mileage as the V6, the vast majority of Tundra buyers select the big engine.
Since the 5.7 liter makes 71 horsepower more than the 4.6 liter and gets almost
the same fuel mileage as the V6, the vast majority of Tundra buyers select the big engine.
The Subaru has a 300 - horsepower, 2.5 - liter four - cylinder, a six - speed manual transmission, and gets
the same fuel mileage rating as the MR: 18 mpg in the city, 24 mpg on the highway.
This puts it in
the same fuel mileage range as much smaller and less capable crossover SUV's.
Same ground clearance,
same fuel mileage, good looks, with MORE standard features, more horsepower, easier for my wife to get in and out of.
Interestingly, both engines get essentially
the same fuel mileage but the more powerful engine shaves nearly a full second off the SUV's 0 -60-mph acceleration time.
Not exact matches
Actually, if a car produces more power for the
same amount of
fuel, it will improve
mileage.
If you do not keep the overall diameter of your tire the
same (wheel diameter + sidewall height) you will be altering your final gear ratio which will make your speedometer incorrect, alter your
fuel mileage (better or worse depends on driving behavior and altered size), impacts your acceleration, what speed you can reach in which gears, your effective power band, etc..
The CX - 3's
fuel mileage estimates of 29/35 mpg city / highway also fall short of the 3's 30/40 mpg rating with the
same powertrain.
Still, this a super-comfortable car that's lavishly appointed and even offers the
same 17/26 mpg city / highway EPA
fuel -
mileage rating as the Genesis 4.6, with its 385 - hp, 4.6 - liter V - 8.
It's mated to GM's new nine - speed automatic and loses 1 mpg in the AWD's EPA highway
fuel mileage compared with the Traverse with the
same drivetrain.
In comparison, the 2016 Hyundai Tucson, which is based on the
same platform as the Sportage, might not be as boldly designed or as fun to drive, but its highway
fuel mileage benefit is undeniable.
Gas
mileage is still the
same as when we bought it, with 27ish mpg's combined driving and premium
fuel every time we fill.
Though they are essentially the
same car, the Optima uses a larger Turbo Charger, and consequently gets worse
fuel mileage.
The next step up is the A6 3.0 T, which uses the
same drivetrain as the Avant 3.0 T and offers identical
fuel mileage.
Fuel mileage was the
same as it has always been: poor.
My truck says the estimated
mileage is 15 city / 21 hwy I drive normal and my mpg highway is 16 mpg and city 12 this has been my worst truck in
fuel consumption, you can even see a dirty black tailpipe, dealer says, if it does not show codes it is fine it drives great and I like it except the mpg and no dic switch for a Lt I guess as not to scare us for the estimated
mileage it was going to show honestly, if I had known of this poor mpg I would still be buying ford trucks, they always gave about 19 to 23 mpg my wife love it and at the
same time hate it because it didn't came with running boards like all my other Fords other than that it is a great truck with poor mpg
The base 1.6 engine, as before, is no barn burner, but if
fuel economy is high on your list, opt for the automatic with ISG and you'll get the
same highway
mileage as the manual and better city
fuel economy.
With the manual or the optional five - speed automatic,
fuel mileage is the
same: 19 mpg in the city, 25 mpg on the highway.
The Sonic's base 1.8 - liter four - cylinder motor is good for 138 horsepower, but upgrading to the available 1.4 - liter turbocharged four - cylinder mill introduces 148 lb - ft of torque (while maintaining the
same number of horses at the crank) along with improved
fuel mileage figures of 29 - mpg city and 40 - mpg highway.
Outstanding
fuel economy and sleek styling are two great reasons to consider this Volkswagen GTI.Low, low
mileage coupled with an exacting maintenance program make this vehicle a rare find.More information about the 2013 Volkswagen GTI: The Volkswagen GTI offers up strong performance, yet it has essentially the
same space - efficient interior layout of the Golf hatchback — and that's a major asset for those who need to use the GTI as a daily driver.
At the
same time, it is incorporated with a common rail direct injection based
fuel supply system, which helps in generating a
mileage of 20 Kmpl within the city and 22 Kmpl on the highways.
You can save your bank account and
fuel at the
same time by utilizing used car websites, such as BestRide.com, to help locate and purchase a low
mileage, high - quality used hybrid sedan.
Its engine is also the
same - a 4.3 - liter V - 6 capable of 195 horsepower and 260 lb - ft of torque - and
fuel mileage with the four - speed automatic transmission shows as 15 mpg in stop and go driving and 20 mpg on the highway
My previous vehicle was a truck with the
same size engine, and this vehicle gets a somewhat better
fuel mileage than the last.
The smaller engine has a
fuel economy rating of 13 miles per gallon around town and 16 miles per gallon on the highway, while the larger motor sees the
same city
mileage and 17 miles per gallon during highway cruising.
To add to the comparison, the plug - in average
fuel mileage is basically the
same as the way less expensive Accord Hybrid.
He gave me the exact
same spin, saying that it was my driving habits which caused the drop in
fuel mileage and that I am a liar.
The entry - level, 121 horsepower 1.6 - liter four - cylinder engine offered by the Clubman returns 31 - mpg in combined
fuel mileage, but stepping up to the S model introduces a turbocharged 181 horsepower version of the
same engine.
Not bad, given — if nothing else — grim
fuel mileage of 12 miles per gallon city and 18 mpg highway for the vehicle tested, a 390 - horsepower Supercharged model, which is the
same mileage a regular 300 - horse Sport gets.
Engine-wise, it's more of the
same with the Murano offering last year's 260 horsepower, 3.5 - liter V - 6, but the newly - tuned continuously - variable automatic transmission improves
fuel mileage for both front - wheel and all - wheel drive models.
My only real concern with the Fit is the
same one I had when I tested it more than a year ago: With the Fit Sport, it isn't a huge jump price-wise to a Honda Civic LX, a car that is 19 inches longer than the Fit, has 31 more horsepower and gets comparable
fuel mileage.
I notice no difference in
fuel economy and it is essentialy the
same type of
mileage.
It provides slightly better highway
fuel economy than the automatic at 37 mpg, but the
same 30 mpg estimate for city
fuel mileage.
Selecting the CVT does increase city
fuel mileage one mpg to 26, but the highway
mileage stays the
same at 34.
Fuel mileage is the
same in manual vs. automatic at 16/21 city / highway.
At the upper end of the lineup, there's now an «LE Eco» trim level that uses an upgraded version of the
same engine that develops 140 hp and delivers slightly better
fuel mileage: up to an EPA rated 42 mpg on the highway.
This multi-purpose vehicle would definitely attract
mileage quotient mindset as it sports the
same fuel efficient engines doing duty in younger brothers.
Yet at the
same time, the Ridgeline drives like a crossover, gets respectable
fuel mileage, and has a highly functional interior.
You won't see the
same fuel economy with the later Honda hybrid, however, as highway
mileage tops out at 43 - mpg alongside a city rating of 40 - mpg.
American partner Qatar Airways offers service to Johannesburg from its hub in Doha, and so long as you fly on Qatar to Doha as your transatlantic hop, it's possible to book an award at this
same mileage amount while avoiding almost all
fuel surcharges and fees.
And remember:
Fuel economy in your car decreases by 2 percent for every 100 pounds you're carrying, so if you put 1,600 pounds in that Ford the
mileage drops to about 10 mpg — almost the
same as the moving truck.