Sentences with phrase «same funding per»

As NPE noted, these forms of instruction are «potentially profitable» because the schools receive the same funding per student that a standard district public or charter school would get, «while having far fewer costs for teachers, services, transportation or facilities.»

Schools do not receive the same funding per pupil, with choice and charter school students receiving $ 1,000 s less per student than the city's public schools.

«Same class size, same funding per pupil as their coed public counterparts,» he says.

Not exact matches

Achieved 5.4 % growth in Funds from operations available to the company's common shareholders (NAREIT FFO) to $ 0.39 per diluted share, compared to $ 0.37 per diluted share during the same period in 2017.

Funding at any one round is typically done at same terms or per share value, even if it's staggered over multiple tranches.

Interstate Capital offers same - day funding with advance rates of up to 100 % and discount rates starting at 0.49 % per invoice.

DDR Corp says operating funds from operations attributable to common shareholders was $ 108.8 million, or $ 0.30 per diluted share for Q2.DDR Corp sees 2017 expected interest income of $ 26 million to $ 29 million.Q2 earnings per share view $ 0.00 — Thomson Reuters I / B / E / S.Q2 FFO per share view $ 0.28 — Thomson Reuters I / B / E / S.Expected annual growth in same store net operating income range for co's total portfolio is loss of 1.5 % to growth of 0.0 %.

Living Goods began, in 2008, as a partnership with BRAC to operate a network of CHPs in Uganda, and in 2009 launched a directly - managed network of CHPs using the same model.42 Living Goods has provided both technical and financial support, totaling over $ 2 million, to BRAC for the CHP program.43 BRAC has 128 branches with active CHPs in Uganda, but only 24 of these branches currently receive significant funding from Living Goods and have additional features, such as incentive payments for CHPs and a higher number of CHPs per branch.44

Most importantly, the Fund has returned an average of 8.4 % per year since its inception in October 2006, outperforming the MSCI World Index's annualized gain of 5.0 % over the same period.

The Fund has returned an average of 2 % per year since its inception in October 2006, outperforming the MSCI World Index's annualized loss of 2 % over the same period.

For the five years ended this past August 31, the Group of Fifteen experienced on average negative returns of 8.89 % per year, vs. a negative 2.71 % for the S&P 500.4 The group of ten value funds I had studied in the «Searching for Rational Investors» article had been suggested by Bob Goldfarb of the Sequoia Fund.5 Over those same five years, the Goldfarb Ten enjoyed positive average annual returns of 9.83 %.

However, because of the capital movements of investors who bailed out during periods after the fund had underperformed for awhile, the average investor (weighted by dollars invested) actually turned that 18 % annual gain into an 11 % LOSS per year during the same 10 year period.

The Fund has returned an average of 10 % per year since its inception in September 1992, outperforming the MSCI World ex U.S. Index, which has averaged 6 % per year over the same period.

The underlying components of the 2055 fund can be bought in the same proportions for 0.14 % per year rather than 0.24 % in management fees.

Most importantly, the Fund has returned an average of 10 % per year since its inception in September 1992, outperforming the MSCI World ex U.S. Index, which has averaged 6 % per year over the same period.

Whereas the Vanguard fund posted 7.2 % annual dividend growth from 2007 to 2012, the broad market S&P 500 index increased its distributions by only 1.01 % per year during the same period.

More importantly, the Fund has returned an average of 7 % per year since inception, outperforming the MSCI World Index, which has averaged 3 % per year over the same period.

A fund's per share capital gain distributions are the same for each share class offered.

Since its inception in September 1992, the Fund has returned an average of 11 % per year, outperforming the MSCI World ex U.S. Index, which has averaged 6 % per year over the same period.

Assets held by Challenger's two main funds management businesses are expected to balloon by a compound annual rate of 13 per cent over the same time period.

While analysts believe the likelihood of a full - blown price war remains less than 50 per cent, fund managers believe Coles is willing to sacrifice profit growth to boost same - store sales and protect its market share.

Post-16 places in maintained special schools, special academies and non-maintained special schools are funded at # 10,000 per place, the same as pre-16 high needs places.

The County Executive has proposed a 2007 Library budget that keeps funding flat for the third year in a row $ 7 million less than we received 2 years ago, roughly the same level of funding we received ten years ago $ 35 less per average $ 100,000 taxable property than the Library received in 2000!

If you drive per pupil funding towards a certain group - an extremely worthy group admittedly - but then hold cash funding per pupil at the same level overall then you are actually cutting * cash * spending per pupil for the majority.

And per - student city funding for the community colleges decreased by 13 percent over the same period, also when adjusted for inflation.

SMA gets only a tenth of the federal funding of another motor - neuron condition, Lou Gehrig's Disease — even though the disorders claim the same number of victims per year.

We asked half of our sample whether they would like to see funding for schools in their district increase, decrease, or remain the same, while we told the other half the current per - pupil spending in their district before we asked that question.

PLCs generally receive the same per - pupil funding as traditional schools.

To simulate school - level Title I funds under the current regime, I assume that districts allocate the same amount of Title I dollars per eligible student to each Title I school, regardless of grade span or FRPL - eligibility rate.

State and Territory funding for the nation's private schools rose from $ 2124 to $ 2378 per student over the same period.

For computer - based learning to continue its disruptive march into education, legislatures must not fall into the trap of allocating the same per - pupil funding to computer - based learning that school districts receive.

In contrast, if a district used state and local funds to cover one teacher per 25 students in its non-Title I schools, but only got to that same ratio in its Title I schools through a combination of federal Title I dollars along with state and local funds, the auditor would — in keeping with the letter and spirit of the new law — find the district in violation.

Using a complicated formula approved by the court, the state funds magnet schools that accept students from several different districts (at a minimum there must be two) at a per - pupil rate that increases as the number of districts sending students increases — an attempt to bring central - city minority students and white suburban students together in the same school.

When enrollments are rising, however, the dilemma faced by state governments is even more difficult, as maintaining the same level of funding per student necessitates either raising taxes or reducing other types of expenditures.

Previously, charter and district schools in Florida each received the same per - student allocation in base operating funds from the state's school - finance program, which combines both state and local money.

Once full, free schools receive exactly the same per - pupil funding as any state school.

While funds are allocated among eligible schools in proportion to their number of students from low - income families, the size of the grant per student from a low - income family need not be the same for all eligible schools.

The LEA then estimates how much instructional funding eligible private school students would have generated in their zoned public school had they attended, using the same per - pupil amount spent in the public school.

In fact, during the 2017 - 2018 fiscal year, YEP's adult education program is expected to educate students at a cost of $ 209 per student for the entire year, compared to the $ 10,556 that public charter high schools would receive in MFP funds for educating those same young people.

While many LEAs allocate the same amount of Title I funds per student from a low - income family to each school chosen to participate in the program, others allocate higher amounts per low - income student to schools with higher percentages of such students.

In 18 states, local funding per student fell over the same period.

PLCs are a part of students» home school districts and receive the same per - pupil funding as any other district school.

So, Gray noted, even two districts with the same percentage of students with high needs won't get the same per - student funding increases in the transition.

Should per student funding at every school be exactly the same?

In 2014, parents of students at Horace Mann Elementary School in Northwest Washington, D.C., spent over $ 470,000 of their own money to support the school's programs.1 With just under 290 students enrolled for the 2013 - 14 school year, this means that, in addition to public funding, Horace Mann spent about an extra $ 1,600 for each student.2 Those dollars — equivalent to 9 percent of the District of Columbia's average per - pupil spending3 — paid for new art and music teachers and classroom aides to allow for small group instruction.4 During the same school year, the parent - teacher association, or PTA, raised another $ 100,000 in parent donations and collected over $ 200,000 in membership dues, which it used for similar initiatives in future years.5 Not surprisingly, Horace Mann is one of the most affluent schools in the city, with only 6 percent of students coming from low - income families.6

For example, if we're talking about school funding, advocating for equality would mean ensuring that all schools had the same amount of resources per pupil (an improvement in most cases, to be sure).

DfE figures show that the percentage of qualified teachers (those with Qualified Teacher Status) in all state funded schools was 95.1 per cent in 2015; a decrease from 95.5 per cent in 2014 while the total number of teachers without QTS increased over the same period from 20.3 thousand full time equivalent staff (FTE) or 4.5 per cent in 2014 to 22.5 thousand FTEs or 4.9 per cent in 2015.

The 2011 - 12 Budget Act also required school districts to assume the same level of per - pupil funding in 2011 - 12 as they received in 2010 - 11, essentially requiring COEs to ignore proposed trigger reductions when reviewing school district budgets, according to the report.

Meanwhile, schools are basically funded by bands of enrollment; a school with, say, 401 students will get more than a school for 399, but the school with 401 will get the same amount as one with 499 (though schools can get more per student for different reasons).

The new school grades come the same week as the Public School Forum's release of data that show vast differences in per pupil education funding between North Carolina's poor and wealthy school districts.