Schools do not receive
the same funding per pupil, with choice and charter school students receiving $ 1,000 s less per student than the city's public schools.
«Same class size,
same funding per pupil as their coed public counterparts,» he says.
Not exact matches
If you drive
per pupil funding towards a certain group - an extremely worthy group admittedly - but then hold cash
funding per pupil at the
same level overall then you are actually cutting * cash * spending
per pupil for the majority.
We asked half of our sample whether they would like to see
funding for schools in their district increase, decrease, or remain the
same, while we told the other half the current
per -
pupil spending in their district before we asked that question.
PLCs generally receive the
same per -
pupil funding as traditional schools.
For computer - based learning to continue its disruptive march into education, legislatures must not fall into the trap of allocating the
same per -
pupil funding to computer - based learning that school districts receive.
Using a complicated formula approved by the court, the state
funds magnet schools that accept students from several different districts (at a minimum there must be two) at a
per -
pupil rate that increases as the number of districts sending students increases — an attempt to bring central - city minority students and white suburban students together in the
same school.
Once full, free schools receive exactly the
same per -
pupil funding as any state school.
The LEA then estimates how much instructional
funding eligible private school students would have generated in their zoned public school had they attended, using the
same per -
pupil amount spent in the public school.
PLCs are a part of students» home school districts and receive the
same per -
pupil funding as any other district school.
In 2014, parents of students at Horace Mann Elementary School in Northwest Washington, D.C., spent over $ 470,000 of their own money to support the school's programs.1 With just under 290 students enrolled for the 2013 - 14 school year, this means that, in addition to public
funding, Horace Mann spent about an extra $ 1,600 for each student.2 Those dollars — equivalent to 9 percent of the District of Columbia's average
per -
pupil spending3 — paid for new art and music teachers and classroom aides to allow for small group instruction.4 During the
same school year, the parent - teacher association, or PTA, raised another $ 100,000 in parent donations and collected over $ 200,000 in membership dues, which it used for similar initiatives in future years.5 Not surprisingly, Horace Mann is one of the most affluent schools in the city, with only 6 percent of students coming from low - income families.6
For example, if we're talking about school
funding, advocating for equality would mean ensuring that all schools had the
same amount of resources
per pupil (an improvement in most cases, to be sure).
The 2011 - 12 Budget Act also required school districts to assume the
same level of
per -
pupil funding in 2011 - 12 as they received in 2010 - 11, essentially requiring COEs to ignore proposed trigger reductions when reviewing school district budgets, according to the report.
The new school grades come the
same week as the Public School Forum's release of data that show vast differences in
per pupil education
funding between North Carolina's poor and wealthy school districts.
The original New Jersey charter public school law mandated
per pupil funding for each charter public school student equal to 90 percent of the amount allocated for a child in a traditional district school in the
same school district.
We will increase it to # 55.3 bn by 2020, the
same level of
funding required to protect
per pupil funding in 2020.»
Regardless of what public school a child goes to the
per pupil funding for that child should be the
same.
: The worst student to teacher ratios in the country; near the worst
per pupil funding in the US; low starting salary schedules that shortchange new teachers so the oldest teachers can be overpaid, though all do the
same work; LIFO policies so that younger teachers are always fired first no matter how good they are and no matter how poor senior teachers are; teacher layoffs expected at every recession, with waves of recessions expected indefinitely; bad
funding in the absence of recessions and worse
funding in recessions; constant loading with additional requirements and expectations; poor and worsening teacher morale; poor and worsening working conditions; ugly architecturally uninspired facilities and often trashy temporary classrooms; inadequate learning materials, resources and technology; inadequate administrative support with the worst student / administrator ratios in the county; inadequate librarian, psychologist, behavioral specialist, counselor, nurse support due to the worst ratios; inadequate student discipline structures; and much more...
A lump sum and
per pupil funding formula is not the most efficient way to share out a limited pot of money, although it is simple, because it assumes that every extra child costs the
same to educate.
These incentives might include additional
per -
pupil funding for each transfer student, construction
funds to make more space available,
funds to recruit and employ on - site advocates and mentors to ensure the social comfort and the pedagogic progress of these students, and
funds to underwrite their transportation by the
same convenient means that wealthy people use to transport their children to private schools — not by circuitous and exhausting bus routes, but rather by point - to - point travel, typically in small vans, from one specific urban neighborhood to one specific school or district.
The schools receive
per -
pupil funding that matches traditional public schools, but they're not subject to the
same oversight and accountability standards.
Along the
same lines, John Goodlad's pioneering study of more than 2,500 schools (2004) concluded that the
same faculty, with the
same bargaining agreement, the
same per -
pupil funding, and the
same schedule, could have dramatically different results with different leadership.