Sentences with phrase «same general court»

Not exact matches

In the same article we reported that while the Citizens United case was pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, Virginia Thomas, the wife of the Justice, created a nonprofit Tea Party advocacy group, Liberty Central, Inc., with a former lawyer for the Charles G. Koch Foundation, Sarah Field, acting as her General Counsel and a former Koch lobbyist, Matt Schlapp, serving on her board at inception.

«During the oral arguments last month before the Supreme Court, Justice Alito asked the Solicitor General (who was arguing that same - sex couples have a constitutional right to marry) if the Bob Jones University ruling would result in the loss of tax - exempt status of any religious school that opposed same - sex marriage.

So it wasn't just one person «childishly vilifying» another person's god, they were making the same statement about religion in general... if the situation was precisely the same, but let's say a Catholic had assaulted the guy dressed up as the zombie pope, would the outcome have been different in court?

The discharge of the seven suspects follows a motion filed in court by the Attorney General to drop the charge of treason felony and conspiracy to commit same against them, Accra - based Starr FM reports.

The Code provides in the same Rule that «A judge is permitted to make public statements (my emphasis) in the course of his or her official duties or to explain for public information the procedure of the court, general legal principles, or what may be learned from the public record in a case.

We find it very bizarre that the Hon. Attorney - General, Ms Gloria Akufo, who assured the entire citizenry of her commitment to fairness and strict adherence to ethical principles at her vetting not too long ago, will claim that she exercised the said constitutional discretion on grounds merely that there was a lack of evidence to prosecute the case in question when indeed, the Siting Judge, Court Clerks, Court Bailiffs, Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from Court Clerks, Court Bailiffs, Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from Court Bailiffs, Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from same.

On the same day community watch volunteer George Zimmerman made his first appearance in court to face murder charges in the death of Florida teen Trayvon Martin, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman tells WAMC that the case is a good example of what can happen when the public takes an interest in pursuing justice.

In many states where the following positions are elected offices, voters elected state executive branch offices (including Lieutenant Governors (though some will be voted for on the same ticket as the gubernatorial nominee), Secretary of state, state Treasurer, state Auditor, state Attorney General, state Superintendent of Education, Commissioners of Insurance, Agriculture or, Labor, etc.) and state judicial branch offices (seats on state Supreme Courts and, in some states, state appellate coCourts and, in some states, state appellate courtscourts).

The governor may at any time recommend to the general court supplementary budgets which shall be subject to the same procedures as the original budget.

It is on the basis of the above that when on the 25th of April, 2018, the Senate invited the Inspector - General of Police to appear before it on the 26th of April 2018, in respect of the felonious offenses for which Sen. Dino Melaye was taken into Police custody, investigated and arraigned in a Court of Competent Jurisdiction in Lokoja, but because the Inspector - General of Police was on official assignment with the President of Federal Republic of Nigeria to Bauchi on same date, he delegated the Deputy Inspector - General of Police, Department of Operations, Assistant Inspector - Generals of Police and some Commissioners of Police conversant with the matter to brief the Senate.

Probably, to give bite to the President's promise to deal with forces threatening the corporate survival of the country, the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, has approached the Federal High Court for the revocation of the bail granted the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, by Justice Binta Murtala Nyako of the same court, last ACourt for the revocation of the bail granted the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, by Justice Binta Murtala Nyako of the same court, last Acourt, last April.

UPDATE 11/17: On Nov. 16 — one day after this story first appeared online — the U.S. Attorney's office said in a court filing that it had received an email the same day from «counsel for Fuller Road Management Corporation,» a nonprofit affiliated with SUNY Polytechnic Institute, claiming that the May 2016 search warrant application (quoted in this story) «contains incorrect assertions regarding FRMC [document] productions to» the state attorney general's office.

The governor entered the Court of Appeals through the same door as its judges, sitting beside the robed jurists as he gazed down upon the state's attorney general, comptroller and prosecutors in the pews below.

However, due to the respect the IGP has for the Senate, that when on the 25th of April, 2018, the Senate invited the Inspector - General of Police to appear before it on the 26th of April 2018, in respect of the felonious offenses for which Sen. Dino Melaye was taken into Police custody, investigated and arraigned in a Court of Competent Jurisdiction while the Inspector - General of Police was on official assignment with the President of Federal Republic of Nigeria in Bauchi on same date, that he delegated the Deputy Inspector - General of Police, Department of Operations, Assistant Inspector - Generals of Police and some Commissioners of Police conversant with the matter to brief the Senate.

Two people from the same ethnic group are more likely to have a close match, yet in court cases, the likelihood of a random match between DNA from two different people is usually estimated using data from the general population.

Established in 1848, by an act of the Great and General Court of Massachusetts, the Boston Public Library (BPL) was the first large free municipal library For other places with the same name, see Boston (disambiguation).

But behind the students stand a Silicon Valley technology magnate [David Welch] who is financing the case and an all - star cast of lawyers that includes Theodore B. Olson, the former solicitor general of the United States [and George W. Bush's former Solicitor General], who recently won the Supreme Court case that effectively overturned the state's ban on same - sex marriage.general of the United States [and George W. Bush's former Solicitor General], who recently won the Supreme Court case that effectively overturned the state's ban on same - sex marriage.General], who recently won the Supreme Court case that effectively overturned the state's ban on same - sex marriage.»

Join NSBA General Counsel Francisco Negrón and members of the NSBA legal team for a review of key decisions from the high court during its 2015 term, including its landmark same sex marriage ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges.

These are the same kinds of organizations that went to court in Georgia after the 2008 General Assembly created a path and the funding formula for expanded charter school options.

Moreover, the Connecticut Attorney General has acknowledged in these same court papers that to fund a system of magnet and charters would be more expensive than providing adequate support to the existing traditional public school system.

The Court held that the group funds» aggregate collective ownership of the subject security was directly relevant to the issue of beneficial ownership because the group funds shared the same general partner.

Simply put, while Walmart, Kroger and Dollar General are competing for the same customer base, pet stores are courting an entirely different — and growing — group of pet owners; those who are more focused on quality than on price when shopping for their four - legged loved ones.

Hooper LJ concluded that the position of Ms Ratcliff e and Lt Cdr K must be looked at in the context of the particular pension scheme under consideration by the court; and, in general terms, by the end of 2003 unmarried couples were being «treated in substantially the same way as married couples» (para [72]-RRB-.

According to the General Court, the purpose of the private investor test is to establish whether, despite the fact that the State has at its disposal means which are not available to the private investor, the private investor would, in the same circumstances, have taken a comparable investment decision.

«We are pleased the court ordered the Department of Homeland Security to restore DACA under the same conditions set forth by a federal court in California,» said New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, one of the plaintiffs, in a statement.

At the same time he was attempting to integrate skills training through moot courts, however, Stearns also noted what was to be a common problem with moot courts and competent legal writing instruction in general: the amount of work it took on the part of the professor.

Among the great things that happened on November 4, voters ousted anti-consumer judges in major upsets by electing two chief justices and two supreme court incumbents, and re-electing the West Virginia attorney general, who has been relentlessly targeted by «tort reform» groups and attacked during the campaign by U.S. Chamber of Commerce - supported ads, which were produced by the same nice folks who brought you the famous «swift boat» spots.

Counsels the operator of one of the largest mining projects in the Southern Hemisphere on general legal and tax issues; representation of the same before local courts and authorities

The General Court thus applied the same standard of review to both sanctions regimes alike.

The same reasoning can be found in the action brought by the Prophet River and West Moberly First Nations in a concurrent judicial review to the Federal Court of the decision of the Governor in Council under the Canada Environmental Assessment Act, 2012: Prophet River First Nation v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FC 1030.

It's just not the same as your general state court or even federal court litigations.

Whilst the Court does not explicitly reiterate this cautious attitude, the way it structures the application of the test to the facts of the case follows that proposed by the Advocate - General which represents a welcome departure from the way the Court applied the same test in Allianz.

However, in general, they will look to cases considered by the same court and superior courts, before examining cases in other jurisdictions - this applies between different states, as well as between different countries.

«At the same time, there is a general sense, reinforced by the Supreme Court decision, that mandatory minimums brought in by the previous government in a number of cases went too far,» he said after an event in Waterloo, Ont.

The Court referenced the Ontario case of Bedford v. Attorney General (Canada), but noted that a case that raises many of the same issues in Ontario may not be binding in another province, and that the applicants in these two cases are quite different.

Applying the Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 27, the Court noted that «subject to certain well - known exceptions, the general rule is that when an issue of fact or law is actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, and the determination is essential to the judgment, the determination is conclusive in a subsequent action between the parties, whether on the same or a different claim.»

Sam Glover: Right, so here's the example that comes to my mind is most first - year lawyers who try to litigate in Minnesota make the same mistake because the civil rules say that a response to a Motion for Summary Judgment is due within a certain amount of time, and then there's this whole separate set of rules called the general rules of practice for District Court, and they have a different timeline.

By a majority of 5:2 the UKSC held (para 51 - 2) the Attorney General was not entitled by this wording to issue the certificate merely because, considering the same facts and arguments, he took a different view from that of the tribunal or court.

But, the decision leaves Congress with the option of potentially changing that statute which currently limits the personal jurisdiction of federal trial courts to that of a state court of general jurisdiction in the same state, as it already does in cases that are predominantly «in rem» (e.g. interpleader cases and interstate boundary and real property title disputes), in bankruptcy cases, and with respect to the subpoena power of U.S. District Ccourts to that of a state court of general jurisdiction in the same state, as it already does in cases that are predominantly «in rem» (e.g. interpleader cases and interstate boundary and real property title disputes), in bankruptcy cases, and with respect to the subpoena power of U.S. District CourtsCourts.

If a forum state's courts have «general jurisdiction» over a defendant, this means that the defendant can be sued in that forum on any cause of action against that defendant arising anywhere in the world, regardless of any other relationship that the claim has to the forum state (except for claims in the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts which can be brought in a U.S. District Court located in the same state, or in an arbitration forum pursuant to a valid arbitration clause that binds the parties, an issue beyond the scope of this question and answer).

Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Ginsburg expressed a general concern about consistency between the district court actions and AIA proceedings concerning the same patent.

Furthermore, the AG insists on the fact that national courts will have to assess whether there are no equally effective and less restrictive means available in the national system to achieve the same goal as a general data retention obligation (§ § 206 - 215), thereby passing on a difficult but very important balancing exercise to the national courts.

Of greatest significance for the prospects of Bill C - 14, in Canada (Attorney General) v. E.G., 2016 ABCA 155, the Alberta Court of Appeal recently flatly rejected the interpretation of Carter that was offered by the Attorney General of Canada in the arguments against the authorization (which are the same arguments the government has offered in support of Bill C - 14).

In agreeing that the standard of review was that of reasonableness, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified a point that had been unclear: [80] the same general principles apply to the review of municipal bylaws as apply to the review of administrative action.

7 Art. 103, General Organic Code of Processes (2015): The court judgments, arbitral awards and acts of mediation issued abroad, whether or not they have been homologated and issued in an adversarial proceedings, will have in Ecuador the same treatment as they have in the current international treaties and conventions -LRB-...).

In a very general sense, it means that if a court has already decided on a particular legal issue in one case, the court should follow its decision on that same issue in subsequent cases.

It is worth noting that the Supreme Court's next decision, Association of Justice Counsel v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 SCC 55, is the same in this regard.

The Court refers to its famous judgments in Singh and Eind, which concerned obstacles to the free movement of workers, and makes it clear that the same reasoning also holds in cases where the general free movement right of Article 21 (1) TFEU is at stake.

In general, courts favour keeping siblings together in the same home and maximizing the amount of time children spend with each parent.

Last Friday, the Supreme Court of Canada decided Canada (Attorney General) v. Hislop, which upheld in part and invalidated in part the legislation that restricted access to pension benefits for the surviving partner of a same sex relationship.