Not exact matches
In the
graph below, you can see that we may be in line for more of the
same, unless the market is wrong about oil futures, since the Budget 2013 WTI forecast again lies
above the futures price.
We will then wait a little for the price level to increase
above this point (support line) as soon as the price drops below the support line again; we would consequently enter a trade heading on the
same course the
graph is heading once it drops below the support line.
After observing how the red and green bars in the
above graph are nearly identical, suggesting similar protein requirements during the initiation and promotion periods, let's refresh our memories by taking another look at the occurrence of pre-cancerous lesions in the
same rats:
For the
same QSC mentioned
above, «Use patterns to continue numerical sequences; identify the rule», numerous supporting QSCs in the Knowledge Cluster are applications in skip counting such as reading thermometers, telling time or interpreting
graphs whose scales are counting in multiple units.
In the
graph below the axes are the
same as the
graph immediately
above.
The set of
graphs below are created the
same way as the
graph above except that instead of using the level of inflation to create the groups, I've used the 12 - month change in inflation.
I found putting the RSI (3) or Williams % Range (14) superimposed over the MACD on the
same graph with the levels marked at 05/95 helps keep me to place entries more successfully when the RSI / W % R is below /
above these levels respectively and always after the MACD divergence signal appears.
One piece of evidence I already covered is the dismal 2.3 % annual return of the average individual investor from the J&P Morgan
graph above, as compared to the 7.7 % annual return of the S&P 500 over the
same period.
Applying today's (November 2017) 10 - year bond yield of about 2.4 % to the
above graph, we should expect 10 - year returns on such a bond fund to be about the
same.
The green line «forecast» for the period 1995 - 2000 in the
graph above is well below actual observations for the
same period.
Now if you need to you can take another quick look at the extinction risk
graph on top of this article, or the original version of the
same graph that's shown
above.
The
graph below shows the
same data as the
graph above but shaded to show what range of possible actual temperatures the
graphed line represents.
Here's the next
graph, this is the corrected min temp average for
above same data, with the
same range as outlined from the first
graph on top of min temp.
The next
graph overlays the two
above at the
same scale, normalized to the late 1970's.
The
graph below shows the
same data as the one
above, but it groups data points into a single dot at its members» center with bars to indicate where 95 % of its membership falls.