I find it very interesting that the hybrid and diesel models get the exact
same highway mileage numbers.
The base 1.6 engine, as before, is no barn burner, but if fuel economy is high on your list, opt for the automatic with ISG and you'll get
the same highway mileage as the manual and better city fuel economy.
Unfortunately, it does so in a $ 120,805 hybrid that gets 23 mpg on the highway —
the same highway mileage as the all - wheel - drive LS 460 and 1 mpg worse than the rear - drive version.
Not exact matches
As copy editor Rusty Blackwell observed, «It seems that the
highway mileage could be boosted significantly - and overall noise reduced at the
same time - if Mazda made fifth and sixth gears a bit taller.
The CX - 3's fuel
mileage estimates of 29/35 mpg city /
highway also fall short of the 3's 30/40 mpg rating with the
same powertrain.
Still, this a super-comfortable car that's lavishly appointed and even offers the
same 17/26 mpg city /
highway EPA fuel -
mileage rating as the Genesis 4.6, with its 385 - hp, 4.6 - liter V - 8.
It's mated to GM's new nine - speed automatic and loses 1 mpg in the AWD's EPA
highway fuel
mileage compared with the Traverse with the
same drivetrain.
In comparison, the 2016 Hyundai Tucson, which is based on the
same platform as the Sportage, might not be as boldly designed or as fun to drive, but its
highway fuel
mileage benefit is undeniable.
At the
same time, it ekes out a bit better gas
mileage: 14 or 15 mpg city, 20 or 21 mpg on the
highway.
The four - wheel - drive version has the
same city
mileage, but
highway mileage drops to 21 mpg.
My truck says the estimated
mileage is 15 city / 21 hwy I drive normal and my mpg
highway is 16 mpg and city 12 this has been my worst truck in fuel consumption, you can even see a dirty black tailpipe, dealer says, if it does not show codes it is fine it drives great and I like it except the mpg and no dic switch for a Lt I guess as not to scare us for the estimated
mileage it was going to show honestly, if I had known of this poor mpg I would still be buying ford trucks, they always gave about 19 to 23 mpg my wife love it and at the
same time hate it because it didn't came with running boards like all my other Fords other than that it is a great truck with poor mpg
Gas
mileage is roughly the
same as the QX60, listed at 18 mpg city, 27 mpg
highway, and 21 mpg combined.
With the manual or the optional five - speed automatic, fuel
mileage is the
same: 19 mpg in the city, 25 mpg on the
highway.
The Sonic's base 1.8 - liter four - cylinder motor is good for 138 horsepower, but upgrading to the available 1.4 - liter turbocharged four - cylinder mill introduces 148 lb - ft of torque (while maintaining the
same number of horses at the crank) along with improved fuel
mileage figures of 29 - mpg city and 40 - mpg
highway.
At the
same time, it is incorporated with a common rail direct injection based fuel supply system, which helps in generating a
mileage of 20 Kmpl within the city and 22 Kmpl on the
highways.
Its engine is also the
same - a 4.3 - liter V - 6 capable of 195 horsepower and 260 lb - ft of torque - and fuel
mileage with the four - speed automatic transmission shows as 15 mpg in stop and go driving and 20 mpg on the
highway
Not according to fuelecon omy.gov, which says the Hyundai Tucson, Subaru Forester and Kia Sportage — all in the
same class as the Journey — get better gas
mileage than the Journey's 21 mpg combined city -
highway.
Both the cars have the
same mileage of 17.5 kmpl in the city but Fiesta returns a
mileage of 23.5 kmpl as per ARAI on the
highways.
The smaller engine has a fuel economy rating of 13 miles per gallon around town and 16 miles per gallon on the
highway, while the larger motor sees the
same city
mileage and 17 miles per gallon during
highway cruising.
The Subaru has a 300 - horsepower, 2.5 - liter four - cylinder, a six - speed manual transmission, and gets the
same fuel
mileage rating as the MR: 18 mpg in the city, 24 mpg on the
highway.
Not bad, given — if nothing else — grim fuel
mileage of 12 miles per gallon city and 18 mpg
highway for the vehicle tested, a 390 - horsepower Supercharged model, which is the
same mileage a regular 300 - horse Sport gets.
For the 2008 Fit, despite the fact that it's the
same car, the EPA ratings will drop to 27 mpg city, 34 mpg
highway, not because the 2008 Fit gets worse
mileage, but because the EPA has changed its testing methods to better reflect the real world.
(The Chevy, Ford, Honda and Jeep six - cylinder engines we tested delivered about the
same gas
mileage - right at 20 mpg on the
highway, about 17 mpg when city and off - road driving was included.)
It provides slightly better
highway fuel economy than the automatic at 37 mpg, but the
same 30 mpg estimate for city fuel
mileage.
Selecting the CVT does increase city fuel
mileage one mpg to 26, but the
highway mileage stays the
same at 34.
Fuel
mileage is the
same in manual vs. automatic at 16/21 city /
highway.
Since the 5.7 - liter makes 71 horsepower more than the 4.6 - liter and gets almost the
same fuel
mileage as the V6, the vast majority of Tundra buyers select the big engine, although the new 4.6 - liter V8 bests both the 4.0 - liter and 5.7 - liter in
highway fuel economy.
At the upper end of the lineup, there's now an «LE Eco» trim level that uses an upgraded version of the
same engine that develops 140 hp and delivers slightly better fuel
mileage: up to an EPA rated 42 mpg on the
highway.
The MSRP is nearly identical, and the gas
mileage is exactly the
same for both city and
highway driving.
You won't see the
same fuel economy with the later Honda hybrid, however, as
highway mileage tops out at 43 - mpg alongside a city rating of 40 - mpg.
The 4 - cylinder model sees a 1 mpg increase in the manual transmission in the city and the
highway mileage remains the
same, but the CVT gets 4 mpg more in the city and 2 mpg more on the
highway over last year's automatic.