Sentences with phrase «same issue before a court»

Not exact matches

At almost the same time that he wrote the opinion sustaining the «bubble law,» Justice Stevens issued another opinion for the Court, this one invalidating a high school policy that permitted student - led prayer before football games.

The meeting came just one day before the pope met with Kim Davis, the Kentucky County Clerk who made national headlines for refusing to issue marriage licenses because of her opposition to the Supreme Court's legalization of same sex marriage.

Ryan is to appear Tuesday before Judge Edwin Berman in Cook County Circuit Court to ask for the same type of order Berman issued Jan. 8 that ordered cemeteries to permit burial of Jews who already own burial plots in the cemeteries affected by the strike and lockout.

Dasuki who is standing trial on allegation of alleged misappropriation of $ 2.1 bn along with four others before Justice Baba Yusuf insisted that the charges against him by the complainant on the same issue constituted a gross abuse of court process.

Dasuki who is standing trial on allegation of alleged misappropriation of fund along with four others before Justice Baba Yusuf had insisted that the charges against him by the complainant on the same issue constituted a gross abuse of court process.

Dasuki has been put on trial before Justice Baba Yusuf and another charge was filed against him before Justice Peter Affem both of the FCT High Court on the same issue and subject.

We will have some answers soon enough, as the Davey case, now pending before the Court, presents many of the same issues.

The very same issue was argued before the Supreme Court just two years ago in Friedrichs v. CTA, but when Justice Scalia died shortly after oral arguments, that case was left unresolved.

The plaintiffs chose not to appeal that decision, but insisted on continuing to litigate the same patent and many of the exact same issues before the California federal court.

Third, shouldn't inconvenient sustainability issues be resolved before we proceed any further, by applying the same guidelines to renewable energy as courts, regulators and eco-activists apply to fossil fuels?

It is unclear whether this more expansive approach, focusing on purpose and encompassing documents created by third parties, would be applied if the issue were to come before the same court again.

Counsels the operator of one of the largest mining projects in the Southern Hemisphere on general legal and tax issues; representation of the same before local courts and authorities

The responsibility of the Court is not only to determine the issues in the instant case before it but do so in a way that provides some guidance as to how other courts might determine similar cases that are not necessarily based on the same facts but that at least give rise to the same or similar issues.

At the same time, she told the Court of Appeal it should not consider this issue because it was not addressed before the benchers panel by Zoraik's lawyer.

Stevenson, J. noted that these issues had been before three levels of court in the criminal proceedings, and all three courts had reached the same conclusion.

If we consider this issue in the context of the TransMountain pipeline proceedings, we should ask Alberta to explain how its participation will assist the Court in addressing the issues before it and not blindly assume its participation will not be duplicative of existing parties or otherwise constructive — in other words, hold Alberta to the same standard which was asked of the Tsartlip First Nation in this case.

In theory, they concentrate multiple lawsuits involving the same subject before one court, and the court helps the parties streamline the litigation by, for example, entering pretrial orders that apply in every case, rather than having many different courts address the same issues over and over again.

However, it still requires that the necessary parties be joined and the same issues be raised that were before the Court below.

Those earlier motions were heard by Haines J., and dealt with many of the same issues that are now again before the court.

But that was before United States v. Alvarez, a Supreme Court decision issued the same day as the health care ruling.

22 According to the referring court, the issue which thus arises in the proceedings pending before it is that of determining whether the EU legislation on residence uses the same concept of «social assistance» as the EU legislation on social security.

Rather, Peter raises the same issues as were raised in the pending proceedings, that is, whether the power of attorney and will executed by Karl and put before the court by Arnold have been the product of undue influence or were signed in suspicious circumstances.

2) apart from the fact that CJEU stated that even before EU exercising its power, the MS must still act - when they have the power to do so - in a matter which does not jeopardise or prejudice the EU, so that the mere «potential» competence does have an effect, limitating the MS action, the parallel is that a negative rule is still a rule, so that the existence of the rule makes the matter «regulated»: - as for the JHA, I must say that whilst I agree with you on the merits, I can see the issue raised by the CJEU, since it is quite the same raised by some national Constitutional Courts, i.e. that ECHR standards may be in conflict with national standards and formally speaking the ECHR is a treaty and therefore has a lower rank that national Constititions, and the decision of the ECHR on the interpretation of such standards within the context of the Convention does not bind the national Constitutional Court in interpreting the national Constitution standards: e.g..

One reason the Alice case is before the Supreme Court in the first place is that the court made a hash of the same issue four yearsCourt in the first place is that the court made a hash of the same issue four yearscourt made a hash of the same issue four years ago.

In a 2010 decision known as Bilski, the court explored many of the same issues that are now before it in Alice — but provided little useful guidance on how to screen for such patents in the future.