We have seen
the same kind of debate arise over the causes of global warming.
Not exact matches
It's the
same kind of sentiment that was in full force in the health care
debate.
It's the exact
same logical fallacy as the Sun: to pretend that criticising some
kinds of immigration
debate is the
same as criticising all
kinds of immigration
debate.
«We've had this
debate going on for a couple
of years now — are they red because
of good old - fashioned rust like Mars, or because
of the
same kinds of organic materials... that make carrots and tomatoes and watermelon red?»
Scientists have engineered devices that similarly steer sound waves along their edges, but researchers
debated whether that
same kind of control could be exerted over the light particles generated inside lasers (SN: 5/2/15, p. 9).
The
same kind of thing happens in an English class when they create newspapers, or publish books, and in social studies or history when they role - play the armistice
of World War I, or the
debates between Lincoln and Douglass.
The
same kind of distractions from the business at hand must be said
of the Common Core State Standards
debate, which has drained our collective energies and focus on students.
George Tramountanas: This is the story that ended Straczynski's run on «Amazing Spider - Man» and created a maelstrom that fans continue to
debate today. My take is pretty much the
same as a lot
of fans out there: Â I understand the reasons for undoing the marriage, disliked the way it was done, but enjoy the current direction
of the book. I often wonder if this story will be remembered in the
same light as Ben Reilly's time as Spider - Man, or if history will be even... less
kind.
Saying the law will lead to an influx
of unwanted and unsavory foreigners, as the AKC is doing, is the
same kind of fear tactic that taints our country's broader
debate over human immigration.
My boyfriend ended up getting the
same face as him (despite
debating on getting a different one) and it's just
kind of weird.
Display # 7 by the
same token — the surfacing
of the paradigm
of minimal art from the 60's defined a new way
of focussing on things and made a relationship with things through that
kind of dialectical
debate that many artists participated with.
But at the
same time, it's important to keep in mind that science is a ground on which trial and error over time leads to progress, and it would be wrong to discount wrong hypotheses all together as completely worthless — they do also play a role in this setting by providing a
kind of «dynamic force» and keep the
debates going.
Part
of the job that needs doing is exactly that
kind of debate - changing: bringing those firms digging the carbon up into that
same place where (a) they acknowledge the trajectory we * must * take if we're to leave a liveable planet for our children (b) end up within reporting / action frameworks that make greenwashing impossible.
By making a caricature
of Monckton, Delingpole, and climate scepticism, the BBC reveals itself as the
same kind of beast it attempted to slay: given to dogma, unwilling to countenance either
debate or dissent, and failing to reflect on its function as an impartial broadcaster.
And yet the
same kind of unhinged repudiation
of an overwhelming body
of scientific facts is treated not as the private obsession
of a handful
of nutcases, but as a legitimate part
of the «
debate» over global warming.