Sentences with phrase «same kind of statements»

They were the same kind of statements he has made every year for the last 12 years.

I am convinced I've see this very same kind of statement elsewhere, it must be gathering popularity with the masses.

You can find the same kinds of statements on the Wikipedia page for «Global Climate Model».

Not exact matches

After the backlash, Trump issued a rare conciliatory statement and spoke to Panamanian press, insisting that he was simply criticizing the negotiating abilities of American politicians and that «if I were from Panama, I'd try and make the same kind of a deal, I respect that.»

Otherwise, you adopt the same kind of mindset they do when they expect people to just accept their statements as facts, yet they provide no evidence to support them...

On the basis of the First Amendment, as well as the general principles of the Constitution, he opposed public payment for chaplains in Congress and the military, spoke out against national proclamations of days of prayer (though as president he did «recommend» them) and while president vetoed congressional efforts to incorporate churches in the District of Columbia (fullest statement, V: 103 - 105) At the same time, Madison frequently opined that it was appropriate for private citizens to support chaplains and various kinds of semiorganized public religion through voluntary contributions (V: 104,105)

The statement in Romans 15:3, «Christ did not please himself,» is another case of the same kind.

Regarding the rest of your statement about Jesus, I used to believe the same way you do, and now find the exact opposite of that kind of Jesus in the Bible.

Matthew writes: «Instead of taking the references to same - sex behavior as a sweeping statement about all same - sex relationships, my dad started to ask: is this verse about the kind of relationship Matthew wants, or is it about abusive or lustful behavior?

You are making progress» @Chad «ah, the made up accusation, you fabvorite A. you need better bait B. you'll find those kind of statements are so much more compelling if you provide evidence of same

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I've often suspected that part of the problem is that my mother takes personally any choices I make as a parent that are not the same as those she made with me — like this is some kind of statement that I think she was a bad mother.

He said it was clear that the kind of disdain for human life which the PDP exhibited in its incautious statement is the same reason the girls were kidnapped in the first instance, and for which then PDP - controlled Federal Government took what seemed an eternity before even acknowledging the abduction — thus losing critical time for their rescue.

«New York's airspace should enjoy the same kind of protections, as our Nation's Capital [sic],» he declared in a statement issued Wednesday night.

No other color makes the same kind of sophisticated statement.

Arriving the same year American Spike Lee would remake his seminal Oldboy, Park Chan Wook's highly anticipated first English - language feature proved a kind of poetic statement of call - and - response to the tendency for North American cinema to re-make excellent films not just more linguistically palatable, but better while they're at it.

In addition, writer Alex Garland is trying to make some kind of statement about God and religion, but the specifics of what he's saying are murky, and director Danny Boyle isn't on the same page.

And at the same time, it makes the kind of understated style statement an Audi should.

Kindle Oasis has been launched a few days ago, and with its launch, Amazon has made a statement that it is not going to cater the same kind of products to its customers over and over again.

Nobody checks their insurance statement each month with the same kind of excitement or hope they do with savings or investing statements.

According to the statement, TWS «does not condone animal cruelty or illegal behavior of any kind» — but that's hardly the same thing as condemning what was done in this case.

Bosses released a statement last week in which they described it as inevitable that a game about DJing wouldn't have the same kind of appeal - right from the outset at least - as a title like Guitar Hero.

Maybe not in the same way as it was to the painter, but meaningful in some shared human way... I'm simply trying to get back to a kind of painting that doesn't need a written explanation — that doesn't need a statement on the wall next to it.

The next time I stood in the same museum having a crucial experience with reductive abstraction, I was looking at Ellsworth Kelly's famous five color spectrum piece in the 1996 show called, «Abstraction in the Twentieth Century: Total Risk, Freedom, Discipline,» and all of a sudden I was totally getting it, realizing for the first time how to internalize this kind of reductive painting as a sophisticated, witty statement.

That kind of statement will always be true unless climate really does get screuwed - up and it ends up being the same temperature everywhere.

Some kind of contradiction here, Hansen's figure is invalid if there is variability on multiple timescales, and same issue with Gavin's «It's statistics» statement.

(2) If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements made by and other conduct of a party are to be interpreted according to the understanding that a reasonable person of the same kind as the other party would have had in the same circumstances.

So, taking (i) these things into consideration i would like to know what kind of statements i have to make before any insurance company to make settlement process smooth in case of any mishappenings (ii) if a person is a tobacco users then premium increases for the same sum assured but what happens if a person is a alcohol users?

I think adding in the same kind of energy and animation that he shows in his ending statement into the rest of the video would be very helpful.

It was Franklin D. Roosevelt who brought national attention to the need for relationship education with this statement, «Today we are faced with the preeminent fact that, if civilization is to survive, we must cultivate the science of human relationships... the ability of all peoples, of all kinds, to live together, in the same world, at peace.»