Sentences with phrase «same kind of surface»

So if you practice on the same kind of surface as you would race on your dog will be able to give you more and is less prone to injury.
Choose the same kind of surface and take care that the surface you have chosen is totally different from the kind of surface you have at home.

Not exact matches

At the same time, rumors surfaced that Time Inc. was weighing some kind of alliance with Meredith Corp..
«What we have described as globalization is remarkably close to Teilhard de Chardin's planetization, in which «[mankind, born on this planet and spread over its entire surface, come [s] gradually to form round its earthly matrix, a single, major, organic unity, enclosed upon itself.4 Thus the globalization of humankind could lead to the formation of a new kind of living entity — a social organism — on the same cosmic principle as that by which atoms join to form molecules, molecules join to form mega-molecules, mega-molecules unite to form living cells, and innumerable cells constitute an organism.
The company's expansion plans have left some wondering if Meyer and Shake Shack CEO Randy Garutti can continue to inspire the same kind of frenzied demand that fuels regular, hour - long waits for what is, on the surface, just a burger.
«Yes, the surface consists of nanotubes, but basically nanotubes are just a thicker form of the native oxide, which is the same as the white pigment that you find everywhere: in food, toothpaste, cosmetics, multivitamin and multimineral supplements, paints — all kinds of products,» she said.
While I'm on the topic — here's Kindle 2 drop tested the same way as other Kindles — 30 ″ on some kind of hard surface.
Allegedly, Ice Shuffle is a kind of version of Curling, but all I know is that it invokes the same frictionless physics that made games like the NHL series so appealing, where objects zoom around on a pleasant, gleaming surface at unnatural speeds.
In these earlyworks there is a lyricism, a tenderness of touch, of surface, and content, while the more recent work of the same subject matter is tougher, sharper, bolder and more imposing materially, thus proposing another kind of youthfulness in older age though the return to landscape or nature as a thematic seems to bracket the period of cooler irony of Artschwager's most noted works, emerging in the era of Pop Art and continuing through the era of appropriation art.
Display # 7 by the same token — the surfacing of the paradigm of minimal art from the 60's defined a new way of focussing on things and made a relationship with things through that kind of dialectical debate that many artists participated with.
The paintings with which he first began to make his name a decade or more earlier, alongside his contemporaries Leon Kossoff and Lucian Freud, seem intent on a kind of one - upmanship in demonstrating the sheer mass of pigment that a surface can hold; his Head of EOW — his first muse Stella West — seems to emerge Golem - like from clay and mud, the same ooze of material that clogs his Building Site, Earl's Court Road, Winter of two years earlier.
The modelled surfaces have the same kind of texture as Rodin's work but the figures are slightly distorted in order to emphasize the pose.
«A shiny surface gives depth to the flatness at the same time as it emphasizes the flatness» he says, «But it is a kind of depth which is entirely the opposite of atmospheric depth of traditional easel painting.
So it seems to me that the simple way of communicating a complex problem has led to several fallacies becoming fixed in the discussions of the real problem; (1) the Earth is a black body, (2) with no materials either surrounding the systems or in the systems, (3) in radiative energy transport equilibrium, (4) response is chaotic solely based on extremely rough appeal to temporal - based chaotic response, (5) but at the same time exhibits trends, (6) but at the same time averages of chaotic response are not chaotic, (7) the mathematical model is a boundary value problem yet it is solved in the time domain, (8) absolutely all that matters is the incoming radiative energy at the TOA and the outgoing radiative energy at the Earth's surface, (9) all the physical phenomena and processes that are occurring between the TOA and the surface along with all the materials within the subsystems can be ignored, (10) including all other activities of human kind save for our contributions of CO2 to the atmosphere, (11) neglecting to mention that if these were true there would be no problem yet we continue to expend time and money working on the problem.
Since I am plotting all these values on a 2D surface plot, whatever kind of uncertainty you would see would only get smeared to the same extent as the diffusional model automatically shows smearing.
The same kind of back - of - the - envelope calculation works for the slow climatic warming, but now all of the heat has to be conducted downwards from the surface.
This must be reduced somewhat if you're measuring the same thing at the Earth's surface, and reduced again if you're averaging over the whole planet, over all the seasons, over day and night and so on — I've seen the figure of 240W / m ² quoted for this kind of measurement.
But don't take to much notice of me as I also believe that Advection i.e. the kind of horizontal air movements that follow isobaric surfaces and therefore are predominantly horizontal) have got more of a Green House Effect (GHE) than does a radiation circuit, of say 324 W / m ² originally removed from the surface, and then returned via Green House Gases (GHGs)-- which, by the way, show no sign of having warmed at all (no hot spot) But even so, when somehow the same 324 W / m ² are delivered back to the surface for absorption it is supposed to be getting warmer.
I believe that if in the vacuum of space you place a blackbody object with (a) a constant (i.e., unchanging energy per unit time) internal thermal energy source, and (b) internal / surface thermal conduction properties such that independent of how energy enters the blackbody, the surface temperature of the blackbody is everywhere the same and you place that object in cold space (no background thermal radiation of any kind), eventually the object will come to a steady state condition — i.e., the object will eventually radiate energy to space at a rate equal to the rate of energy produced by the internal energy source.
Also, these products are kind of apples - to - apples; In fact, if you go to Microsoft's Surface Pro's page, you can see them clearly comparing their product to Macbook Air, the same with Surface Book and Macbook Pro.
The Surface Book 2 13 has great contrast and brightness, but not nearly the same kind of color gamut and accuracy.
The Surface Pro is the same kind of hybrid device, partway between laptop and tablet, and it's been finding success.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z