We heard
the same lame argument with Flowers and Apple.
Not exact matches
Sigh...
same old
lame argument from people who do not understand history or have been indoctrinated by the David Barton school of revisionism.
That puts them in the
same category as your pet kitten and rocks, which is why this is a pretty
lame argument.
But if Bonami's
argument is that Murakami represents a fresh challenge to the art world, in the
same way that Rauschenberg challenged the hegemony of Europe in 1964, it is a
lame one.
Mosher trots out the
same lame - assed
argument yet again.
A creationist commenter on a post of mine discussing
lame creationist
arguments first admitted that he did not actually read my post, and then began to repeat the
same tired creationists lies and logical fallacies we hear over and over again.