It is used most commonly in products liability cases where there are multiple parties suing a manufacturer or distributor on
the same legal grounds.
Not exact matches
Silver's conviction of doing favors for a doctor and two real estate companies that funneled
legal fees to him was overturned in July on the
same grounds.
«(i) that in matters of personal conduct he would be subject to the hospital's general procedures and that in matters of professional conduct he would be subject to a procedure agreed by the Local Negotiating Committee in respect of medical practitioners; (ii) that he was accused by the Trust of personal and professional misconduct; (iii) that because of the nature of the allegations made against him he was contractually entitled to a formal disciplinary hearing by a panel which included a clinician of the
same discipline as himself and a legally qualified chairman, before which he would have the benefit of
legal representation, if he so wished; (iv) that the disciplinary hearing which resulted in the findings of misconduct was not conducted in accordance with the terms of his contract of employment because the panel did not include a clinician of the
same discipline as himself, nor a legally qualified chairman and because his request to be allowed
legal representation was refused; (iv) that following the panel's findings he was dismissed for personal and professional misconduct; (v) that if the proceedings had been carried out in accordance with his contract of employment the panel would not have found that he was guilty of personal and professional misconduct and he would not have been dismissed; (vii) that because he was dismissed on the
grounds of personal and professional misconduct (including dishonesty) he has been unable to find comparable alternative employment» [at para 10]:
Alternatively, we consider that an individual may be able to challenge a local authority's decision to use a PSPO to evict rough sleepers or the occupants of an unauthorised encampments by way of judicial review on much the
same grounds with the benefit of
legal aid and
legal representation.
In Oklahoma, the
grounds for a
legal separation are the
same as for a divorce.
However, it is notable that the public debate has not criticised the difficulty of securing a native title determination on the
same grounds that it prevents Indigenous people from gaining
legal title to their traditional lands, on which economic development depends.
California is a no - fault state, and both a
legal separation and a divorce require the
same grounds.
However, if you do, the
grounds for
legal separation are the
same as for a divorce.
The
grounds for
legal separation (or a divorce from bed and board) are the
same as for divorce.
The
grounds for a
legal separation are the
same as they are for a divorce.
i had twin sons; aged 13; in my care at the time; all children were mine biologically.i was a single mother; had no family in new jersey.my sons were on aid for dependent children.i could have notified.teacher was awarded temp.custody; on no
legal grounds; august 25th, 1977; of 3 months; and i three months supervised visits; although d.y.f.s. never presented any evidence i was unfit.i still have all papers from 1976 to 2012; when i contacted assignment judge costello (2012); from courts; that i contacted from 1977 to 2000 «pro se; and all civil actions were dismissed without being heard.i was denied due process.the teacher hid my daughter after my visits; for 22 years before i relocated to n.y.c.; and took my sons west near relatives; because the teacher took the s.s.i i had been getting for my daughter (1979); and the aid for dependent children was closed the
same year; leaving us homeless; moving from county to county; where welfare was terminated in each county; until we were forced out of new jersey.i found my daughter in 1999; with the help of raymond t. dutcher; agent of n.c.i.c.; n.y.c.; and senator donald t. francesco; and learning disability of new jersey; living apart from the teacher in morristown, n.j. in 1999.