I would raise another objection: in the previous chapter I urged that the term «complementary» be restricted to models which, like wave and particle, are on
the same logical level.
Austin's proposal of Messiah and Logos as complementary christological models more nearly satisfies these conditions.3 Since both models combine divinity and humanity — though in differing ways — they are on essentially
the same logical level.
Wave and particle are models of a single entity (e.g. an electron) in a single situation (e.g. a two - slit experiment); they are on
the same logical level and had previously been employed in the same discipline.
Same logical level of a blanket statement, but of course... I would never state such a thing.
Not exact matches
He himself explains in an earlier chapter of the
same book that «strict metaphysical generality can stop short of literally «everything»,» because «it is enough if a concept applies with complete and a priori Universality within one
logical level» (89).
Nonetheless, music, as literary and cultural critic George Steiner insists, «is brimful of meanings which will not translate into
logical structures or verbal expression... Music is at once cerebral in the highest degree — I repeat that the energies and form - relations in the playing of a quartet, in the interactions of voice and instrument are among the most complex events known to man — and it is at the
same time somatic, carnal and a searching out of resonances in our bodies at
levels deeper than will or consciousness.»
On some
level, Smits, who now weighs roughly 270 pounds, the
same as during his playing days, figures it makes
logical sense: «It's a lot of weight we're lugging around.»
At the
same time, though, Gödel had a crazy - sounding hunch about how you might fill in most of these cracks in mathematics» underlying
logical structure: you simply build more
levels of infinity on top of it.
The
logical fallacy is to propose the artificial sweetener accomplishes the
same obesity protection, with the
same level of risk.
We already know that summer born children don't have the
same level of outcomes at the end of Early Years Foundation Stage as their autumn born counterparts, and this is only
logical since they are younger.
As you can see, some of drawing in your
levels and deciding which is more important than the other can be left up to your own interpretation, but at the
same time you should have a
logical line of reasoning such as «this
level has held price more times», or «that
level created a larger move», etc..