Sentences with phrase «same magnitude we estimate»

Not exact matches

When we standardized all the estimates to a common scenario — i.e., the same exposure to screening, and a similar target population, period of screening, and duration of follow - up — the magnitude of the difference between studies dropped from twentyfold to about fourfold.»

And estimates of species numbers can vary by two to three orders of magnitude, even when applied to the same sample, because different software packages are being used to analyse the amplified genes7.

For male teachers with fewer than three years of experience, the estimated change in the probability of switching districts for a 10 percent increase in salary is 2.6 percentage points; for men with three to five years of experience, the estimated change for a salary increase of the same magnitude is 3.4 percentage points; for still more experienced male teachers, financial effects trail off, down to essentially zero for those with more than 20 years of experience.

For a better sense of the magnitude of these estimates, consider a student who begins the year at the 50th percentile and is assigned to a top - quartile teacher as measured by the Overall Classroom Practices score; by the end of the school year, that student, on average, will score about three percentile points higher in reading and about two points higher in math than a peer who began the year at the same achievement level but was assigned to a bottom - quartile teacher.

Estimates of the same magnitude for ED major gene variance were obtained from both the original and shuffled data sets in the three breeds, excluding the Rottweiler.

«This may be of the same magnitude as presently estimated from the global ocean,» he said.

I think that arguments about magnitude of sensitivity and estimates of certainly are the rightful domain of a skeptic (and even, IMO, arguments about the physics of AGW)-- but the «skeptical» illogic of claiming to accept the basic physic of AGW and at the same time claiming that global warming has «stopped» or «paused» remains.

The magnitude of external forcings estimated using these same model may drop by that much or more.

Finally, the 4 W m − 2 CO2 forcing avoids the uncertainty in the exact magnitude of a doubled CO2 forcing [1,48] estimate of 3.7 W m − 2 for doubled CO2, whereas Hansen et al. [66] obtain 4.1 W m − 2, as well as problems associated with the fact that a doubled CO2 forcing varies as the CO2 amount changes (the assumption that each CO2 doubling has the same forcing is meant to approximate the effect of CO2 absorption line saturation, but actually the forcing per doubling increases as CO2 increases [66,85]-RRB-.

Of course, it is interesting that many of those same «skeptics» also make contradictory arguments that suggest that they have great certainty about the magnitude of the effect (that it definitely isn't as large as the range estimated by the IPCC), and / or argue that none of the ways that climate scientists have measured the effect are valid.

So far from the various ways of translating it to the surface, I have not seen anything that says the same number is not a good order - of - magnitude estimate there either, but it can't be as exact for sure.