Sentences with phrase «same model run»

Here, the same model run is repeated several times with different starting conditions but with the same boundary conditions, such as a prescribed change in the chemical composition of the atmosphere.

And it is this very same model run that is run past the present.

It's the same model he ran in Denver when the Broncos won Super Bowl 50 — a shutdown secondary that let the pass rushers run wild all over opponents.

The (less influential) upper air model data used in SFZ 2008 also differs from the corresponding CSF 2005 data, although evidently being derived from the same model runs.

Note that Santer et al did not limit themselves to the same model runs that Douglass et al used.

Not exact matches

After running performance tests on older models, the company confirmed the speed is likely a result of user perception — the phones run roughly the same speed.

A typical Geekbench distribution should show one big peak — that's the score an iPhone model should get when it's running at full strength, and iPhones of the same model should get about the same score.

Marriott today is still run on the same model.

I'll keep my phone until it dies or a model with enough additional features (like the ability to have multiple instances running at the same time) entices me to upgrade.

I should also mention this is $ / tonne of carbon, while the IPCC report you linked to (which is itself based in part on runs from (an older version of) this same model) mostly quotes $ / tonne of CO2.

That is the same model Kroenke runs his American businesses with.

They are run on a self - sustaining model same as us, and have been heavily involved in tapping up, but at least John Henry is aware of the fans and won't abuse the club like Kroenke.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The same models can be used as running compression socks, or for sitting in the office.

The research team then used the model to conduct a key test that was never done in real life: They ran the model to see what likely would have happened if dispersants had not been injected immediately above the wellhead during the same time period.

Importantly, when modern climate models — the same as those used in the United Nations» recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports — were run under Eocene conditions, many could not replicate these findings.

But when researchers ran the same model with the usual data from the US forecasting programme, it came up short.

A study released last month in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres used three different models to run the same SSCE scenario in which sea - salt engineering was used in the low - latitude oceans to keep top - of - atmosphere radiative forcing at the 2020 level for 50 years and was then abruptly turned off for 20 years.

Hurricanes and tornadoes require specialised models to predict, but Allen says that in theory they could be used to run the same type of experiment.

With future exascale systems, the researchers hope to run the same model at 5 - 10 hertz resolution in approximately five hours or less.

Their models showed that if you visited any star with a planet orbiting from the same distance as Earth down to one tenth that, there is about a 38 percent chance (and likely less) that you would run into a planet and moon system similar to Jupiter's four Galilean satellites (Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto), with similar ratios of moon to planetary diameters and orbital to planetary radii.

His model indicated that a lizard would start to run on two legs when it reached a certain rate of acceleration — the same way a powerboat rears out of the water and a motorcycle pops a wheelie.

To get a sense for how this probability, or risk of such a storm, will change in the future, he performed the same analysis, this time embedding the hurricane model within six global climate models, and running each model from the years 2081 to 2100, under a future scenario in which the world's climate changes as a result of unmitigated growth of greenhouse gas emissions.

By using simulations that were created by running the same model multiple times, with only tiny differences in the initial starting conditions, the scientists could examine the range of summertime temperatures we might expect in the future for the «business - as - usual» and reduced - emissions scenarios.

If you haven't heard of it, here's a quick definition from a 2008 paper by Nick Bostrom and Anders Sandberg, two scientists at the University of Oxford: «The basic idea is to take a particular brain, scan its structure in detail and construct a software model of it so faithful to the original that, when run on appropriate hardware, it will behave in essentially the same way as the original brain.»

The first issue is that calculating TCR for each model from historical «All forcing» runs (histAll) requires using the same simulations and time periods as used in calculating the forcings.

Decadal forecasting, which began in 2007, uses the same climate models that are normally run to simulate changes across many decades, but only goes up to one decade out.

Then, they run the same models again, this time simulating an imaginary world where humans haven't released the greenhouse gases that drive climate change into the atmosphere.

But our bodies just don't run on an every - day - is - the - same kind of model.

There used to be a wide range of different games to choose, from run - and - gun action titles to slow - paced tactical shooters focusing on strategy and tactics, but now most shooters follow the same model of big set pieces, regenerating health,

No immersion, very little teamwork (everyone is just running around doing their «thing»), weapons are unrealistic (nothing but giant, over embellished chunks of metal with exaggerated functions), player team models make no sense (a mix of future U.S. Army soldiers, English soldiers, terrorists with masks, and this ape thing)-- the enemy has the same models too, too many screen markers

Unlike the Naruto: Ultimate Ninja Storm series which is more and more a mess of technical, balance and gameplay issues these days, Brave Soldiers delivers what is a nice, franchise - based fighting game, at first, i was expecting a simple fighting game with some button mashing, however, the game proved me wrong and i fell in love, the combo system, while easy, is a lot more deep than the one in the Naruto games, with all of the characters having two special attacks, two «burst attacks», a knock - away and a launcher respectively, a throw and an ultimate attack (called a «Big Bang Attack»), every character also has an universal dodge - action that sends them behind their enemies while spending one cosmo bar, making bar management that much precious and shielding you from a half - a-hour combo, unlike in the NUNS series, the fighting and the characters are nicely balanced, with every character being fun to play and viable at the same time, the game runs smoothly without frame - rate issues and the cell - shaded graphics, character models, arenas and effects alike are nice to the eye, battles are divided into rounds, with all the tiny nice stuff like character introductions and outros being intact (fun fact: the characters will even comment on their score after the battle), the game also features an awakening system, called the «Seventh Sense» awakening, unlike the NUNS awakening system which became severely unbalanced in the later game, every character simply gains a damage / defense boost, with the conditions being the same for all characters, eliminating situations when one character can use awakening at almost any point in the battle, or one awakening being drastically stronger than the other, the game has a story mode with three story arcs used to unlock characters, a collection mode, tournament modes, a survival mode, a series of special versus modes and online battle modes.

To ascertain whether results were influenced by the change in the size of the sample under analysis, we ran the NCES model on the same sample of observations as used in Modmodel on the same sample of observations as used in ModelModel I.

Charter schools under this model are rhetorically painted as serving the same populations that Shanker's model would've, but their philosophical north is, as Shade Tail said, running education like a business.

One of my doctoral students, in fact, ran five different models using the same dataset and yielded inter / intra correlations that some could actually consider «amazing.»

But before you run out to buy a Prius v, know that the same model with the standard halogen lights earned a Poor rating, and that you would need to drive 20 mph slower in the same conditions to avoid the same crash.

Plus, Tesla still has to get Model 3 production up and running at scale, do the same for the Model Y, start production on the Tesla Semi, and then design and build the pickup truck without any major delays.

The GT - R 45th Anniversary Gold Edition is based on the GT - R Premium model and will be a limited - run variant, with fewer than 30 units bound for the U.S.. Its party piece is a unique gold exterior color that's the same «Silica Brass» hue that adorned the M - Spec variant of the Skyline GT - R R34 in 2001.

I'd go for the Clio 220 too, looks like a major improvement on original 200 T, same goes for the Peugeot sport verison of the 208 GTi, both much more focused models and bound to give some much more expensive kit a run for their money

The prices for the gasoline 2016 Nissan Titan XD undercut the diesel model significantly; it runs from $ 41,485 to $ 61,445 for Crew Cab versions of the same trim levels.

Same old same old Porsche dealers running a black market in premium modSame old same old Porsche dealers running a black market in premium modsame old Porsche dealers running a black market in premium models.

It's also joined at launch by a new S5 model, which packs the same running gear as the S4 launched at last year's Frankfurt motor show, boasting performance improvements from a new turbocharged V6.

While the engineering is relatively straight forward, the same can't be said of the model line - up which runs to seven different models.

Porsche has ramped up the performance of its second - generation Cayenne with the introduction of a potent Turbo S model for 2013, the Cayenne range - topper runs a lightly modified version of the standard Turbo's 4.8 - liter V8 gasoline engine — the same unit used by the Panamera Turbo S. Changes include a freer flowing inlet manifold for improved breathing, increased turbocharger boost pressure and remapped electronics.

The same service package is also available for the M3 but costs a lot more, as will running cost generally on this high - performance model.

Also includes (K47) Air cleaner, high capacity and (KNP) Cooling, external transmission oil cooler., TIRES, P265 / 70R17, ON - / OFF - ROAD, WHITE OUTLINED - LETTER includes an on - / off - road blackwall spare, SUSPENSION PACKAGE, OFF - ROAD includes 1.81» (46 mm) shocks, off - road jounce bumpers, stabilizer bars, (NZZ) Skid Plate Package, (K47) Air cleaner, high capacity and Z71 decals on rear quarters, SPARE TIRE LOCK keyed cylinder lock that utilizes same key as ignition and door, SOUND SYSTEM FEATURE, STEERING WHEEL MOUNTED RADIO CONTROLS, RADIO AND DRIVER INFORMATION CENTER (DIC), SLE PREFERRED EQUIPMENT GROUP includes standard equipment, SKID PLATE PACKAGE includes aluminum front underbody shield starting behind front bumper and running to 1st cross-member, protecting front underbody, oil pan, differential case and transfer case, frame - mounted shields, and SEATS, FRONT 40/20/40 SPLIT - BENCH, 3 - PASSENGER, DRIVER AND PASSENGER MANUAL RECLINING center fold - down armrest with storage, adjustable outboard head restraints and storage pockets on Extended and Crew Cab Models (STD).

A base model BMW 228i will run you about the same money, as it starts at $ 32,850.

All three of these new AMD models run the same inline six under the hood.

Based on the same platform as the Lincoln LS, the two - seat Thunderbird convertible had a 3.9 - liter V - 8 engine and five - speed automatic transmission through the model's entire run, though horsepower climbed from 252 to 280.

50 production coupe models were built in all, with the same wheelbase as the production V8, but with a shorter chassis length and running the X Pack Vantage engine, the car was a true sports coupe.