Is there a strong business reason for doing it «the way we've always done it,» or are you simply following
the same old protocol because it was never renovated?
Not exact matches
The
same protocol was administered to 3 independent cohorts of sex - balanced 4 - to 7 - month -
old nontransgenic (n = 53) and hAPP (n = 53) mice.
Their parents were mis - educated by the
same schools we're trying to fix, and the best tools we've had at our disposal are new curriculum, interim assessments, data
protocols, and 22 year
olds willing to sacrifice themselves 70 - plus hours a week to address issues they're ill - equipped for.
p. 34» The vaccination
protocol that includes the minimum number of vaccines yet still provides a reasonable opportunity to immunize the dog would be: a single dose of combined infectious (attenuated, avirulent, modified live, recombinant viral vectored) CDV, MLV CPV - 2, with MLV CAV - 2, administered at 16 wk of age or
older, plus a rabies shot at the
same time (but inoculated at a separate site on the body).
Layman Lurker, There's no «a priori
protocol» for deciding some newly discovered tree - ring series on the internet should really be part of some of other series, especially when that new series is very short and can't be overlapped with
older samples at the
same location.