Sentences with phrase «same opinion on every matter»

Also, since not all believers hold the same opinion on the matter, what does that say about the validity of the claims of Christianity?

Not exact matches

No man [should] be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor [should he] be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor... otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief... All men [should] be free to profess and by argument to maintain their opinions in matters of religion, and... the same [should] in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities.

«Be it therefore enacted by the General Assembly, that no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship place or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and the same shall in nowise diminish, enlarge, or afflict these civil capacities.»

My opinion on the matter is very clear — children should never be hit because they are people, just like adults, and have the same human rights (or should have) not to get hit anytime they do something «wrong».

I went through the same with my daughter and everyone made sure that I knew their opinion on the matter.

I base this opinion on the fact that at any given age, a huge number of babies will be displaying the same sleep «issues» (sorry for taking you back to 1992 with the lingo), no matter what their parents have done or are doing with regards to sleep.

Public opinion has shifted dramatically in recent years on the issue of same - sex marriage, and it will continue to evolve over time with equally as prominent matters.

This unit is designed to educate students on the 12 most common religions in the world today through web - based research: Baha'i, Buddhism, Christianity, Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam, Jainism, Judaism, Shinto, Sikhism, Taoism and Zoroastrianism; while at the same time facilitating the development of opinions on spiritual matters, teaching tolerance, and strengthening student writing through daily prompts and a final creative writing project.

The same way spelling or grammatical errors will tarnish a reader's opinion of a book (no matter how great the story is), formatting errors will also reflect poorly on your book.

I don't have an opinion either way on this matter, as I'm fairly sure there is a bit of corporate asshatness on both sides, but to say Jay's reasoning is flawed in the same paragraph as suggesting that publishers don't care about readers is illogical to an extraordinary degree.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

Considering that the same district court allowed Apple to leverage a couple of recent Supreme Court opinions concerning fee - shifting in connection with its pursuit of a recovery of attorneys» fees from Samsung, it would seem just fair for Samsung to be allowed to make an Alice argument now, just in time before Judge Lucy Koh will decide on the parties» motions for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) following the recent $ 119 million jury verdict (which was disappointing enough for Apple to request a retrial).

Thomas Jefferson coined the phrase «separation of church and state», justifying separation on the grounds that «no man shall be compelled to... support any religious worship... whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess... their opinion in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish enlarge, or affect their civil capacities».

The Opinion reasons that the inquiry therefore turns on whether the inquirer was acting in her «judicial capacity», whether the proposed representation is part of the same «matter», and whether the inquirer's involvement as a judge involved the «merits.»

At the same time, while I admire Bodine for putting potential business on the line to express an opinion that matters to him, I don't agree with his criticism of the firm entirely.

For example, on a multi-member court like the Supreme Court, does it matter which Justice is assigned to write the opinion, or will the majority (or the whole Court) bargain to the same outcome anyway?

Call them in for the expert opinion on just one matter (one of lesser importance btw when it comes to selling for highest and best net price), then to skimp, you choose to rely on what can only be the very same REALTORS you obviously don't believe can adequately price your home to market your home since you didn't ask their opinions, and to negotiate for you and protect your best interests.